Jonhuwmac

Welcome

Hello Jonhuwmac, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you enjoy the encyclopedia and want to stay. As a first step, you may wish to read the Introduction.

If you have any questions, feel free to ask me at my talk page – I'm happy to help. Or, you can ask your question at the New contributors' help page.

---

Here are some more resources to help you as you explore and contribute to the world's largest encyclopedia...

Finding your way around:

• Table of contents

• Department directory

Need help?

• Questions – a guide on where to ask questions
• Cheatsheet – quick reference on Wikipedia's mark-up codes
• Wikipedia's 5 pillars – an overview of Wikipedia's foundations
• The Wikipedia Adventure (a tutorial orienting you with Wikipedia)

• Article wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
• The simplified ruleset – a summary of Wikipedia's most important rules
• Guide to Wikipedia – a thorough step-by-step guide to Wikipedia

How you can help:

• Contributing to Wikipedia – a guide on how you can help

• Community portal – Wikipedia's hub of activity

Additional tips...

• Please sign your messages on talk pages with four tildes (~~~~). This will automatically insert your "signature" (your username and a date stamp). The or button, on the tool bar above Wikipedia's text editing window, also does this.

• If you would like to play around with your new Wiki skills the Sandbox is for you.

Jonhuwmac, good luck, and have fun. – Robert McClenon (talk) 18:42, 22 October 2014 (UTC)

Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!

Hello, Jonhuwmac. Your question has been answered at the Teahouse Q&A board. Feel free to reply there!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by —teb728 t c 09:42, 23 October 2014 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rollett Stability Factor (January 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Becky Sayles was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rollett Stability Factor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

 ^B E _C K ^Y _S A ^{Y L} E _S  04:33, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

Hello! Jonhuwmac, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  04:33, 1 January 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:K-factor of an amplifier against frequency.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:K-factor of an amplifier against frequency.jpg, which you've attributed to Dr John M Rollett. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 00:01, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

The same message allpies to File:Example plot of the K factor of an amplifier against frequency.svg, File:Plot of the K-factor of an amplifier against frequency.jpg and File:Example plot of the K-factor of an amplifier against frequency.svg -- Diannaa (talk) 00:14, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

File permission problem with File:Example plot of the K factor of an amplifier against frequency.svg

Thanks for uploading File:Example plot of the K factor of an amplifier against frequency.svg, which you've attributed to Dr John M Rollett. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

• make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
• Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read the Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Diannaa (talk) 00:18, 9 February 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rollett Stability Factor (February 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rollett Stability Factor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 16:11, 10 February 2015 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Rollett Stability Factor (August 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rollett Stability Factor and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 05:40, 10 August 2015 (UTC)

Advice regarding Draft:Rollett Stability Factor

Hi John,

1. Let me start by reiterating what Sulfurboy said in his review of Draft:Rollett Stability Factor: Wikipedia is not a reliable source, and should not be used as a reference. To use something specific from a Wikipedia article, cite that article's sources.
2. Free online availability of sources has no bearing on draft approval. Scientific papers behind pay walls are available for free to you and to reviewers through many university libraries, and through Wikipedia:WikiProject Resource Exchange/Resource Request. A review may take slightly longer when sources have to be fetched that way, but do not let that influence your choice of sources; pick the strongest, highest quality sources regardless of free online accessibility.
3. To prove notability, independent reliable sources that address the Rollet Stability Factor directly and in depth are needed. In this case that probably means college textbooks and academic journal articles. Avoid passing mentions like "unrelated blah blah blah, calculate the Rollet Stability Factor, more unrelated blah blah blah," and aim for sources that spend a page or more discussing the Factor.
   • The reliability of microwaves101.com is unclear. "Published in association with the IEEE" leaves the authorship, degree of peer review, and editorial oversight (and the importance of their hall of fame) very murky.
   • The title of the IEEE paper suggests it might be an ideal source, but it's only cited to support the first sentence of the draft. That limited use contrarily implies that it doesn't say much about the subject.
   • Odyseus is a self-published source - one engineer's aide memoire - and as such does not fit Wikipedia's definition of a reliable source.
   • Rollett's paper is good to cite, but does not count towards notability because it is not independent.
4. When Becky Sayles declined the draft, it cited only one independent source, microwaves101.com, whose reliability is iffy. A minimum of two solid sources is required. In practice, a few more are usually required to fulfill all the notability conditions, but quality is much more important than quantity. Too many sources, especially so-so ones, can work against an article if they're perceived as bombardment.
5. Do not expect reviewers to evaluate lists of further reading. If they're independent reliable sources with in-depth coverage of the topic, cite them as references. You may include a further reading section, but be sure to limit it according to Wikipedia:Further reading.
6. I found it difficult to grasp the subject from reading the draft. Admittedly, electronic amplifiers are not my specialty, but my background is in a related field. More context would help. Writing well about technical topics for a general audience is difficult. Any deficiencies in this area won't prevent the draft from being approved, but clarity is bound to be a plus.
7. You might find it useful to reach out to Wikipedia:WikiProject Electronics or perhaps Wikipedia:WikiProject Physics - whichever project's scope you feel best covers your topic. They may be able to offer further advice on whether the topic should have it's own article or be covered as part of a broader article, on sources, on article structure, etc.

Worldbruce (talk) 06:08, 14 August 2015 (UTC)

Draft:Rollett Stability Factor concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Rollett Stability Factor, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:32, 17 January 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rollett Stability Factor

Hello, Jonhuwmac. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Rollett Stability Factor".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 02:32, 9 March 2016 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Rollett Stability Factor

Hello, Jonhuwmac. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Rollett Stability Factor".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 (talk) 13:22, 1 January 2017 (UTC)

Draft:Rollett Stability Factor concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Rollett Stability Factor, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:58, 26 July 2017 (UTC)