October 2012 edit

  Please do not add or change content without verifying it by citing reliable sources, as you did to Paper shredder. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:10, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Bill Oddie. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:11, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia, as you did at Henri Aubergine, you may be blocked from editing. If you need guidance on how to create appropriate pages, try using the Article Wizard. In fact, your account clearly exists for nothing but vandalism, and you will very probably be blocked if you continue in the same way. If you wish to start making constructive contributions, you are, of course, welcome to do so. JamesBWatson (talk) 20:14, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

Please be aware that you can still be blocked if other people use your account to make vandalisms.--Mr Fink (talk) 22:42, 9 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because your account is being used only for vandalism. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Also, note that your claim that the account has been compromised by another user makes it very unlikely indeed that the block will be lifted, since, even if one user requesting an unblock persuades an administrator that he/she will not continue with the vandalism, we will have no way of knowing that another user won't do so. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:15, 11 October 2012 (UTC)Reply