License tagging for File:Fitoutlogo.gif edit

Thanks for uploading File:Fitoutlogo.gif. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 14:05, 11 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Lucaslogo.gif edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Lucaslogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:00, 13 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Fitoutlogo.gif edit

 

Thanks for uploading File:Fitoutlogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:32, 14 October 2011 (UTC)Reply

Article notability notification edit

  Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote recently, S. Lucas, has been tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "S. Lucas" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 14:57, 4 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Lucas Logos small.jpg) edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Lucas Logos small.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:18, 18 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free media (File:Officialpartnermclaren.png) edit

  Thanks for uploading File:Officialpartnermclaren.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:22, 18 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danny Lucas (businessman) (January 20) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by David.moreno72 was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
David.moreno72 12:12, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello, Jomo76! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! David.moreno72 12:12, 20 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Danny Lucas (businessman) (January 21) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dial911 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Dial911 (talk) 00:53, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia:Conflict of interest edit

Hi - it would be good if you could reply at Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk#18:23:25, 21 January 2018 review of submission by Jomo76. KJP1 (talk) 23:08, 21 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Danny Lucas (businessman) has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Danny Lucas (businessman). Thanks! KJP1 (talk) 22:50, 22 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

@KJP1: Thank you for your message. I have now read and understood the guidleines on conflict of interest, and I have made suitable adjustments to my user page and article. I trust I have done these correctly. I welcome any further feedback. Thanks Jomo76 (talk) 12:09, 23 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

MfD nomination of Draft:Danny Lucas (businessman) edit

  Draft:Danny Lucas (businessman), a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Danny Lucas (businessman) and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Draft:Danny Lucas (businessman) during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 05:00, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Reply