Welcome!

edit

Hello, Jojoju1998, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!

Reference errors on 26 December

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:18, 27 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Song information

edit

I see you've added a song information section to the Born Free album page. I don't know if you saw the original Song Information section I did for this page back when I first created it , but if you click on the View History tab for that page, you'll see that on 16 Apr 2015 an editor removed that section (there's a "-4,883" in bold red). That editor and another have removed these sections I wrote from several Williams and Johnny Mathis album pages I created because they feel that the reader should just click on the song title to find out this information. I disagree with their decision. I don't think the average reader is going to click on a song title to go to that song page and then come back to the album page and do that again for however many songs are on the album. I think readers have a much more satisfying experience if they're able to read everything in one place, but I'm not wanting to upset these other editors. I'm only writing to you here to point out what's already happened in case you weren't aware so that you can decide if you want to spend more time doing something that may be deleted like mine was. Danaphile (talk) 15:28, 27 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KGirlTrucker81 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 22:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Jojoju1998, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KGirlTrucker81 huh? what I've been doing 22:12, 28 December 2016 (UTC)Reply