Jojocrafty

Your submission at Articles for creation: CrafterzPwn! (September 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:CrafterzPwn! and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:CrafterzPwn!, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 05:37, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Jojocrafty! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 05:37, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

September 2018 Reply

I have no idea what you are talking about, when you state your data is deleted. I can only go by your edit history and I can’t see anything that has been deleted. Maybe you need to clarify what exactly you are asking about. Dan arndt (talk) 23:42, 4 September 2018 (UTC)

I declined your draft submission because it clearly did not meet the standards required for a Wikipedia article. Firstly the subject is not encyclopedic in nature, the tone, grammar, spelling and style are more like a personal rant than a encyclopedic article. Secondly it is full of original research and is not written in a neutral point of view. Finally it lacks significant coverage in multiple independent reliable published secondary sources. The two references provided are a social media website, YouTube, which is not considered a reliable or acceptable source and the server's own website, which is a primary source and not acceptable either. Dan arndt (talk) 02:38, 5 September 2018 (UTC)

(talk page stalker) Wow... I just tried to read your... "message"... at User talk:Dan arndt and... I had to reboot my brain. Could you please find someone who speaks (and writes) English, get them to translate it for you, and then post it here? You are incomprehensible. byteflush _Talk 00:16, 6 September 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:JoJoCrafty

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice that Draft:JoJoCrafty, a page that you created, has been tagged for deletion. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

• It is unambiguous vandalism or an obvious hoax. (See section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please do not introduce inappropriate pages to Wikipedia; doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.
• It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. John from Idegon (talk) 00:45, 7 September 2018 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:CrafterzPwn!

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:CrafterzPwn!, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Legacypac (talk) 17:21, 18 October 2018 (UTC)