Johnshade2
Welcome! edit
Hello, Johnshade2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! RFD (talk) 19:50, 21 February 2020 (UTC)
- Hi, John. What type of contributions do you plan on making on Wikipedia? John from Idegon (talk) 17:42, 25 February 2020 (UTC)
The WikiLoop Battlefield weekly barnstar edit
|
The WikiLoop Battlefield Barnstar | |
| Congratulations, Johnshade2 You have been recognized as the weekly champion of counter-vandalism of WikiLoop Battlefieldseeking new name,
|
- Congrats! -- BullRangifer (talk) 01:43, 6 March 2020 (UTC)
mail edit
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.
Smallbones(smalltalk) 05:43, 8 March 2020 (UTC)
The WikiLoop Battlefield weekly barnstar edit
|
|
The WikiLoop Battlefield Barnstar | |
| Congratulations, Johnshade2 You have been recognized as the weekly champion of counter-vandalism of WikiLoop Battlefieldseeking new name,
By the way, we currently have no different barnstar image for different level (weekly / monthly / annual) champion, if you are interested in help designing, please help us. Thank you!
|
WikiLoop Battlefield new name vote edit
Dear Johnshade2,
Thank you for your interest and contributions to WikiLoop Battlefield. We are holding a voting for proposed new name. We would like to invite you to this voting. The voting is held at m:WikiProject_WikiLoop/New_name_vote and ends on July 13th 00:00 UTC.
xinbenlv Talk, Remember to "ping" me 05:11, 30 June 2020 (UTC)
Join the RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck edit
Hi Johnshade2,
you are receiving this message because you are an active user of WikiLoop DoubleCheck. We are currently holding a Request for Comments to define trust levels for users of this tool. If you can spare a few minutes, please consider leaving your feedback on the RfC page.
Thank you in advance for sharing your thoughts. Your opinion matters greatly!
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:59, 22 August 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to modify your subscription to these messages you can do so here.
New, simpler RfC to define trust levels for WikiLoop DoubleCheck edit
HI Johnshade2,
I'm writing to let you know we have simplified the RfC on trust levels for the tool WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Please join and share your thoughts about this feature! We made this change after hearing users' comments on the first RfC being too complicated. I hope that you can participate this time around, giving your feedback on this new feature for WikiLoop DoubleCheck users.
Thanks and see you around online,
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 20:05, 19 November 2020 (UTC)
If you would like to update your settings to change the wiki where you receive these messages, please do so here.
January 2021 edit
Hello Johnshade2. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are extremely strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Johnshade2. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Johnshade2|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS 💬 06:21, 5 January 2021 (UTC)
Hello @GSS—I have responded to you in multiple ways, to no avail. Please explain what you are talking about—I have no conflicts of interest. Thanks!
WikiLoop 2020 Year in Review edit
Dear editors, developers and friends:
Thank you for supporting Project WikiLoop! The year 2020 was an unprecedented one. It was unusual for almost everyone. In spite of this, Project WikiLoop continued the hard work and made some progress that we are proud to share with you. We also wanted to extend a big thank you for your support, advice, contributions and love that make all this possible.
Head over to our project page on Meta Wikimedia to read a brief 2020 Year in Review for WikiLoop.
Thank you for taking the time to review Wikipedia using WikiLoop DoubleCheck. Your work is important and it matters to everyone. We look forward to continuing our collaboration through 2021!
María Cruz
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 25 March 2021 (UTC)
March 2021 edit
As previously advised, your edits give the impression you have a financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. You were asked to cease editing until you responded by either stating that you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits, or by complying with the mandatory requirements under the Wikimedia Terms of Use that you disclose your employer, client and affiliation. Again, you can post such a disclosure on your user page at User:Johnshade2, and the template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Johnshade2|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. Please respond before making any other edits to Wikipedia. GSS 💬 17:30, 30 March 2021 (UTC)
Hi there! No, I'm not being paid for my editing at all, nor do I have any financial interest in any my Wikipedia activity. I do confess to earning intellectual interest and pleasure. And I have similar concerns about paid editing, so thank you for yours :)
Copyright issues on Rosamond Bernier edit
Hello. Your edits on Rosamond Bernier are too close to the contents of the New York Times article you got the content from. Please do not copy paste, and please do not loosely paraphrase. If a copyright detector program can detect it, then it is too close to the original text. It's a real pain to clean up. Here are my edits removing the copyright violations. [1]. Thank you. –Novem Linguae (talk) 15:09, 27 April 2021 (UTC)
- Sorry about that and thank you. Not intentional at all, but noted. Johnshade2 (talk) 17:00, 27 May 2023 (UTC)
Concern regarding Draft:Rosamond Bernier edit
Hello, Johnshade2. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Rosamond Bernier, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:01, 7 June 2021 (UTC)