Welcome! edit

Hi Johneverettjones! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 07:02, 22 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for October 10 edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Lorin Blodget, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Busti. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 10 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pieter Stadnitski has been accepted edit

 
Pieter Stadnitski, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Jamiebuba (talk) 20:11, 23 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:42, 29 November 2022 (UTC)Reply

December 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm TylerBurden. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Swedish Americans, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TylerBurden (talk) 16:14, 15 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Holland Land Company edit

This summer, you began a substantial rewrite of the article on the Holland Land Company. I recently overhauled the article on my own initiative, incorporating more books and journals which I had access to. I invite you to review what I wrote to make sure your earlier contributions were preserved. Make corrections as you see fit. Kodak03 (talk) 18:40, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. The page is improving but there is still more work to balance the article.
I've cowritten an article about Paul Busti and his origins in Milan that will be published this summer. Detailing the main actors will help in improving the Holland Land Company article. Currently the article neglects the range of investments held by the Holland Land Company and overseen by Paul Busti. The article currently details the Holland Land Purchase in Western New York, but neglects the other tracts in central New York and western Pennsylvania, plus canal and stock company investments, etc.
The main reference remains Paul D. Evan's Holland Land Company published almost a hundred years ago.
Extending the discussion of the Holland Land Company and the Seneca Nation seems like it deserves a separate article itself (history of the Seneca lands and the State of New York?). The history from the Holland Land Company literature is generally patronizing. There is 150 years of history not included in the article about the Seneca Nation -- there doesn't seem to be sufficient scholarly accounts of this important part of their story. The Hauptman article helps but is only one small piece of that story. The histories printed by the Buffalo Historical Society a century ago are suspect and need careful review. Johneverettjones (talk) 23:36, 28 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
Unfortunately the sources I had available had little to say about the company's lands outside of Western New York, or its other investments.
I agree that the Ogden Land Company should be split off into its own article eventually, but it was the first part of the research I did and what I wrote did not feel like enough for a new article at the time. The company's land sales were not of much historical significance but the lawsuits it was party to are very important in American legal history. The history of the Seneca lands needs an overhaul, being currently dispersed across many articles with a lot of overlap.
I also agree the Buffalo Historical Society piece is not the best source and I have only cited it for some technical details on the Holland Land Company that I did not find in other sources, such as the mention of LeRoy as a trustee. Many of its statements on the Ogden Land Company were repeated in the debates over the company in the Congressional Record, but I will remove some claims that are not. Kodak03 (talk) 05:21, 29 December 2022 (UTC)Reply
The work of Paul D. Evans (his doctoral thesis) remains a reliable and well researched source. Although its publication by the Buffalo Historical Society did involve some editorial censorship, it appears to have been minor. Likewise, Orsamus Turner's works on the Holland Land Company (1859) remains reliable and useful.
It is the pro-Ellicott works in the Buffalo Historical Society publications that are in question, damaged by a family interest in promoting Joseph Ellicott and a nativist denial of the importance of the Dutch investors or the Agent General (C.O.O.) Paul Busti. Johneverettjones (talk) 17:08, 7 January 2023 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message edit

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)Reply