Your Teahouse Question edit

No one answered your question, and I'm not familiar with how to answer what you asked, so try asking again.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 16:55, 10 July 2016 (UTC)}}Reply

Welcome! edit

Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. The following links will help you begin editing on Wikipedia:

Please bear these points in mind while editing Wikipedia

The Wikipedia tutorial is a good place to start learning about Wikipedia. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and discussion pages using four tildes, like this: ~~~~ (the software will replace them with your signature and the date). Again, welcome! Kautilya3 (talk) 06:06, 20 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

John Jaffar Janardan Talk

Request for deletion - Rachna Sharma edit

Dear John, as you have requested for page deletion of Rachna Sharma, i would like to clarify that this page refers to Rachna Sharma who is a life strategist against air hostess as in the article referred by you.Jalsut (talk) 09:56, 22 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Yusuf al-Hindi edit

You PRODded this article, someone removed the PROD-template. As the template says... Do no replace it. If you insist, take it to AfD. Kleuske (talk) 08:57, 23 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Additionally... You may want to check your signature. It's missing a closing 'sup'-tag and messes up subsequent text. Kleuske (talk) 08:58, 23 August 2016 (UTC)Reply
I don't have any customized signature. --John Jaffar Janardan (talk) 04:02, 24 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Ayad al-Jumaili edit

Hi, I wanted to let you know that I have declined you speedy deletion request of Ayad al-Jumaili because I think being a senior leader of ISIL is a credible claim of significance. This of course doesn't mean he is notable, so feel free to take it to WP:AfD if you still think it should be deleted. Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:13, 25 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

John Jaffar Janardan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

The blocking administrator didn't mention, why was I blocked. I didn't create any sock accounts. My ISP is very popular. Every third IP has edits, some trace back to 2014. Some of my IPs don't have any edits. Some IPs edited two times, some one, some even 10 times. I didn't make those edits. I opened my account 7 months ago, and actively edited for more than a month. John Jaffar Janardan (talk) 13:26, 28 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This is a checkuser block; please appeal via WP:UTRS. MER-C 06:27, 30 August 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

John Jaffar Janardan (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #16534 was submitted on Sep 15, 2016 01:39:04. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 01:39, 15 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

UTRS edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

John Jaffar Janardan (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

My UTRS request was denied with a statement "Check users confirms, you have engaged in socking. As long as you create accounts, we will keep blocking them." What accounts, which accounts? Can you be more specific? Repeating The blocking administrator didn't mention, why was I blocked. I didn't create any sock accounts. My ISP is very popular. Every third IP has edits, some trace back to 2014. Some of my IPs don't have any edits. Some IPs edited two times, some one, some even 10 times. I didn't make those edits. I opened my account 7 months ago, and actively edited for more than a month. If I would have been a sock, why I was not blocked in February when I logged in last time. --John Jaffar Janardan (talk) 05:28, 27 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

If you want a more specific answer, you will need to contact WP:UTRS again, as a reviewing admin here will not have access to their checkuser results. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 14:55, 8 October 2016 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.