Nomination of Amphenol ICC for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amphenol ICC is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amphenol ICC until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Robert McClenon (talk) 13:54, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Reply


As mentioned there are some major misconceptions happened, actually Amphenol ICC is a separate company to which Amphenol is a parent company. Secondly I was not able to add references like before and was little unaware of adding references. I have made changes according to the suggestions. Please consider the changes and let me know, so that I can edit until it meets the standards. John Cooper KU (talk) 14:28, 13 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

User:John Cooper KU - Well, there have been previous efforts to create Amphenol ICC that have been deleted as spam. Please state what, if any, your affiliation is with Amphenol ICC or Amphenol, in accordance with the conflict of interest policy, since the only edits you have made have to do with this division of a company. Robert McClenon (talk) 06:21, 14 September 2017 (UTC)Reply

John Cooper KU, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi John Cooper KU! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cullen328 (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

20:03, 14 September 2017 (UTC)

September 2017 edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  
 — Berean Hunter (talk) 15:51, 19 September 2017 (UTC)Reply