Dan Quinn

edit

Your statement was false. The NFL page is based on anonymous reporting. The rule is to wait until the new team announces it.--Rockchalk717 16:35, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Where does the rule state that? John Bois (talk) 19:06, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
WP:SPORTSTRANS Troutfarm27 (Talk) 19:06, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Not to mention it's a long standing consensus at the NFL Project. When NFL analysts report a transaction of any kind, it's usually when the contract was agreed to. It does not mean the contract has been signed. When a player joins a new team or a coach gets hired by another team they are not officially apart of the team until the contract is signed. When the team announces it, that means the contract was signed. When it comes to trades, almost the same exact thing applies except the trade isn't officially completed until the team announces it.--Rockchalk717 19:57, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Additionally, you also seem to not understand the difference between official press releases and journalist reporting. The NFL does not make press releases on transactions. Transactions reported by NFL.com or by NFL social media accounts are not press releases. They are articles, no different than an article about (for example) about a murder or the president signing a bill.--Rockchalk717 20:05, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
WP:SPORTSTRANS is an essay on the topic, not a policy or guideline, but I would recommend reading it. The overall policies that come into play here are biographies of living persons and reliable sources. The short version is that an anonymous report of a sports transaction isn't considered reliable, especially because so many similar reports have been wrong in the past. The transaction really needs to be officially confirmed in some capacity.
Also, I'd suggest reading about usage of the minor edit flag. If you're changing the meaning of an article, even by one word, you should leave the minor edit flag unchecked. Please feel free to let me know if you have any questions. Daniel Quinlan (talk) 20:51, 1 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

John Bois (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Caught by a colocation web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. My IP address is 192.168.1.167. Place any further information here. John Bois (talk) 07:30, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

That is the IP of your home network and not the one you use to connect to the internet. It should appear in the message you see on the screen when you attempt to edit, or you can use a tool like whatismyip dot com to determine it. We need to know this IP in order to look into this. 331dot (talk) 08:43, 9 April 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.