JohnEdison2701

October 2016

Hello, I'm Denisarona. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Garcinia Cambogia, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Denisarona (talk) 06:35, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Please do not add commentary or your own personal analysis to Wikipedia articles, as you did to Garcinia Cambogia. Doing so violates Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy and breaches the formal tone expected in an encyclopedia. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 07:08, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Versageek 09:34, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Hair. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. bonadea contributions talk 09:37, 6 October 2016 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Sarahj2107 (talk) 10:59, 6 October 2016 (UTC)