December 2017 edit

  Hello, I'm Yamaguchi先生. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Myrtleford, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 20:52, 27 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

January 2018 edit

  Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Myrtleford. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 17:29, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

Hello John555566667777. As you are apparently resuming edits where IP 49.3.207.56 (talk · contribs · WHOIS) recently left off, please consider this to be a final warning. Please do not hesitate to contact me or discuss your changes on the relevant talk page if you need guidance with respect to reliable sources and how to incorporate them. Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 17:38, 3 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

June 2018 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Myrtleford, you may be blocked from editing. Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:36, 6 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent addition of unsourced content, refusal to discuss. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 19:40, 6 June 2018 (UTC)Reply