The issue as to how to deal with the conflicting sources about the behaviour of the Dutch-Belgian troops is being discussed on talk:Battle of Waterloo. Please do not make major changes to this section without joining that discussion. David Underdown (talk) 14:19, 4 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

No problem. One other thing to be aware of, it's not immediately obvious to me why the website you were linking too should be regarded as a WP:Reliable source, as defined by Wikipedia. It might be a good idea for you to explain on the Waterloo talk page somethign about who's behind it, and what their credentials are. I should also have done this before:

Welcome!

Hello, Joey123xz, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! David Underdown (talk) 16:16, 4 September 2008 (UTC)Reply

Your recent edits edit

  Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button   located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 17:43, 30 March 2010 (UTC)Reply

Waterloo source newly available online edit

Hi, I found your greeting of March 30 only today, because I haven't bothered to log on for a long time, being too disgusted :-) Thanks. You may be interested to know (as a fellow Waterloo buff) that all three volumes of F. de Bas /J. comte de 't Serclaes de Wommersom, "La Campagne de 1815 aux Pays-Bas d'après les rapports officiels Néerlandais" are available in google books and may be downloaded as pdf-files. I just placed a direct link to vol. III, the report by Col. Van Zuylen van Nijevelt (pp. 288-352) in note 59 in the Battle of Waterloo article. But there is much more. Among others, two versions of gen. Trip's after-battle report (one of 1815, the other slightly longer one of 1823) which obliquely (because Trip did not know he had to defend his conduct at the time; he died in 1835, before Uxbridge accused him posthumously of cowardice) put the lie to the old libel by Uxbridge perpetuated in Siborne. There are also three reports about the Dutch/Belgian 3rd division by gen. Chassé, Col. Detmers, and the chief of staff of the division, lt. col. Van Delen. The first volume describes the Quatre-Bras story, and vol. II the events of the 18th of June. It may be difficult to find the three volumes, because google books is a bit temperamental, but I found the third volume with the keywords ["De Bas" Zuylen] and the second volume with ["De Bas" Uxbridge Trip]. I hope this is useful :-) I am now working on biographies of De Bas and the count 'tSerclaes de Wommersom for wikipedia.--Ereunetes (talk) 20:34, 26 April 2010 (UTC) Reply

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Joey123xz (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #18783 was submitted on Jul 19, 2017 17:12:03. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 17:12, 19 July 2017 (UTC)Reply