Joebray

Not happy

Did your article about Happy About cite significant coverage in secondary sources? — RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 21:34, 30 June 2009 (UTC)

Ok, I'll fix that today. But to be fair, most of the publishers in the list of publishers page do seem to not have "significant coverage in secondary sources". Please check and see if you agree. For instance: Abbeville_Publishing_Group_(Abbeville_Press,_Inc.), Academic_Press, Andrews_McMeel_Publishing.

Proposed deletion of Cougar Mountain Software

The article Cougar Mountain Software has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Only sources are press releases, does not meet WP:GNG

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. MrOllie (talk) 18:13, 20 July 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Logo for Cougar Mountain Software.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Logo for Cougar Mountain Software.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:51, 29 July 2016 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Cougar Mountain Software

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Cougar Mountain Software, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, such as at Articles for Deletion. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discusion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Furrykiller (talk) 20:54, 28 July 2017 (UTC)

Nomination of Cougar Mountain Software for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cougar Mountain Software is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cougar Mountain Software (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Furrykiller (talk) 03:17, 31 July 2017 (UTC)