A belated welcome!

edit
 
Sorry for the belated welcome, but the cookies are still warm!  

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Joebattimelli. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page, consult Wikipedia:Questions, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! Fiddle Faddle 11:16, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keith Weed (May 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Winner 42 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Winner 42 Talk to me! 16:46, 4 May 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Winner 42 Talk to me! 16:46, 4 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keith Weed (May 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rinkle gorge was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Rinkle gorge (talk) 20:27, 21 May 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Joebattimelli, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rinkle gorge (talk) 20:27, 21 May 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keith Weed (September 16)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Onel5969 TT me 13:59, 16 September 2015 (UTC)Reply


 
Hello! Joebattimelli, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Onel5969 TT me 13:59, 16 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Keith Weed (October 29)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Callmemirela was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Callmemirela 🍁 {Talk} 03:06, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Keith Weed has a new comment

edit
 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Keith Weed. Thanks! Fiddle Faddle 11:14, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Reply to your Articles for Creation Help Desk question

edit

  Hello, Joebattimelli! I'm Timtrent. I have replied to your question about a submission at the WikiProject Articles for Creation Help Desk. Fiddle Faddle 11:16, 29 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Keith Weed

edit
 

Hello, Joebattimelli. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Keith Weed".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 TT me 22:38, 1 May 2016 (UTC)Reply