Your submission at Articles for creation: Kwaku Mills edit

 
The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

JodieGarcelle (talk) 23:27, 18 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Kwaku Mills moved to draftspace edit

Thanks for your contributions to Kwaku Mills. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jamiebuba (talk) 12:15, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

March 2024 edit

 

Hello JodieGarcelle. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to Draft:Kwaku Mills, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:JodieGarcelle. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=JodieGarcelle|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Jamiebuba (talk) 12:16, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Hello thanks for your message but you are mistaken - i am in no way being compensated directly or indirectly for these edits. I have no “client”, or financial motivation for the edits and am simply adding information about this topic. JodieGarcelle (talk) 19:17, 19 March 2024 (UTC)Reply
Can you explain why you placed the AFC template showing that your article was approved when infact it was never approved?
Once again, Please refrain from moving your article from draftspace to mainspace as it was submitted for review and you never allowed for the article to be reviewed and moved it to mainspace by an experienced reviewer. If you continue to cause disruptions and move the article to mainspace, i will take it to AFD. Jamiebuba (talk) 03:19, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Kwaku Mills moved to draftspace edit

Thanks for your contributions to Kwaku Mills. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because over a redirect without leaving a redirect: Not ready for mainspace, and virtually certainly also created in violation of the WP:COI guideline & the WMF's terms of use on WP:UPE. . I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Jamiebuba (talk) 03:23, 20 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Welcome! edit

Hi JodieGarcelle! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! ANUwrites 10:50, 21 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Kwaku Mills for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Kwaku Mills is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kwaku Mills until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Jamiebuba (talk) 18:04, 24 March 2024 (UTC)Reply