Jmg5041

Your submission at Articles for creation: Analytic Theology (May 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Shadowowl was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Analytic Theology and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Analytic Theology, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

» Shadowowl | talk 09:45, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Jmg5041! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! » Shadowowl | talk 09:45, 29 May 2018 (UTC)

Analytic theology

Hi,

I came across your queries at Shadowowl's talk page and over at the AfC help desk, and I saw that no-one had replied; I imagine this is down to the complexity of the article itself. What I've done then is accepted it and moved it into "mainspace" to give it a trial by fire if you like. It's important that I note that the article may still be nominated for deletion at a later stage should the community later decide it's not suitable, but I thought this was the best course of action, rather than leave the draft languishing around. Hope that helps, jcc (tea and biscuits) 21:22, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

Can’t believe I never responded. Thanks! Jmg5041 (talk) 19:44, 11 January 2020 (UTC)