User talk:Jmcgnh/Archives/2018/08

Helping me fix the Draft:PassionsNetwork page due to problems with references and a general opinion the article is too promotional?

You were kind enough to look over the page I have been endeavoring to fix, and mentioned that if I could work on the references, you might be willing to give a go at fixing the problems.

I posted a number of potential changes on the Draft:PassionsNetwork talk page (when I thought I was posting them on my own talk page). Just wasn't watching the tabs I had open closely enough. In any case, the first batch of references I found can be seen here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft_talk:Passions_Network

After a comment from an editor stating that I needed more references where my company sites are the primary focus, I found more references (and this time posted them on my talk page...at the very bottom): https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Mic4444

Would you be willing to weed through the ones I found to see if any are worthy of being added, in hopes they will help re-establish 'notability' of the article.

I cannot help how the article was originally created 6 years ago, but I'm hoping with changes, the article can be re-established as notable and moved from Draft back into Wikipedia.

My company is over 14 years old, which makes it one of the older online dating sites, and I continue to work on it daily. As mentioned, I'm open to any changes needed to make the article/page non-promotional/non-advertising. I only ever wanted an informational page about my company and that is still my only goal.

Please let me know if you'd be open to helping. Thanks. Mic4444 (talk) 02:52, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

@Mic4444: I put the assessments there, at Draft talk:Passions Network. I'm afraid it's disappointing news. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 04:30, 3 August 2018 (UTC)

Some baklava for you!

You are awesome! BelliniGirl (talk) 14:01, 27 August 2018 (UTC)

Ping correction

FYI, testing has proven that this doesn't work, even with the re-sign; no notification was generated. You have to either add a whole new comment with a ping and your signature, or remove that comment and start over. ―Mandruss ☎ 21:20, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

Now I belatedly see the user page link in your edit summary, which did generate a notification. ―Mandruss ☎ 21:21, 31 August 2018 (UTC)

@Mandruss: Thanks, I'm trying to remember to consistently use the edit summary trick in these cases. Sometimes I get it right. — jmcgnh^{(talk) (contribs)} 21:25, 31 August 2018 (UTC)