Jmcapdevj

Concern regarding Draft:John R Falck

Hello, Jmcapdevj. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:John R Falck, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 19:02, 28 December 2021 (UTC)

AfC notification: Draft:John R Falck has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:John R Falck. Thanks! DGG ( talk ) 11:20, 27 January 2022 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, Jmcapdevj, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page or you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! S0091 (talk) 23:06, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Draft:John R Falck

Hi Jmcapdevj, reviewers agree Falck is notable but the draft does need some trimming and clean up. You may find this guide helpful for adding citations. If you have questions or need help, you can ask at the Teahouse. S0091 (talk) 23:09, 11 February 2022 (UTC)

Not logged in

Please edit only when you are logged into your account. Otherwise the edits appear as being from an unregistered IP number. David notMD (talk) 21:27, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

February 2022

Your edit to John R. Falck has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 23:09, 25 February 2022 (UTC)

Dear Sir/Madam: I am at a loss to understand the reasons given for deleting my post: Draft: John R Falck. I can state categorically that none of what was listed in my post is copyright protected in that: a) contains only references to original studies published in well established scientific journals, b) since their publication date all of these studies are in the public domain and easily accessed by anybody interested via either the NIH Pub-Med site or using the corresponding DOI number ids, c) the research described in those studies was funded via grants from the USPHS National Institutes of Health, paid for with Federal public funds and, as required by NIH it is accessible to the public at large without restrictions, and d) an inspection of Wikipedia accepted and bibliographies use similar list of scientific studies published in Scientific Journals. Based on the above I am asking that the deletion of the Draft: John R Falck be again make available for revision by me and, eventually accepted for publication in Wikipedia. Jmacapdevj. Jorge H. Capdevila Professor Emeritus of Medicine Vanderbilt University Medical School Jmcapdevj (talk) 21:52, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Please see Wikipedia:Deletion review where any errors can be challenged formally. It is customary and more useful to take this up directly with the admin who performed the deletion. This is User:Jimfbleak. Mistakes happen. This may or may not be one. Please be aware that your title and role in life carry as much weight as do mine. That is none at all. All editors are equal here from Jimbo Wales to the casual one time only anonymous IP editor.

Do please be aware that any article or draft may be edited by any and all editors. Asking for it to be returned to be edited by you is a usual misapprehension. Please see Wikipedia:Ownership of content

Please be sure to declare any Wikipedia:Conflict of interest over Falck if there is one. That includes being a colleague or friend. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 22:18, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

I see anther editor has created a bare bones stub. Good. Falck is notable in Wikipedia terms. My view (above) on your article is that it was unsuitable. Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 19:01, 27 February 2022 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of John R. Falck

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on John R. Falck requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:John_R_Falck.pdf. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. David notMD (talk) 03:25, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Try again

Yes, you can try again. Copy nothing. Learn how to reference. Include content only if you can provide verification in form of reliable source references. Model on existing articles about science academics (not a guarantee). David notMD (talk) 19:47, 26 February 2022 (UTC)

Your thread has been archived

Hi Jmcapdevj! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, Draft: John R. Falck, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please . See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by Lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=Muninnbot}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 1 March 2022 (UTC)

Draft John R falck moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Draft John R falck, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. GPL93 (talk) 22:28, 30 May 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Russell “Camille” Falck (July 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Timtrent was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Russell “Camille” Falck and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:John Russell “Camille” Falck, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 22:02, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Jmcapdevj! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 22:02, 9 July 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Russell “Camille” Falck (August 13)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eagleash was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:John Russell “Camille” Falck and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Eagleash (talk) 00:12, 13 August 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: John Russell Falck has been accepted

John Russell Falck, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Reba16 (talk) 00:33, 16 September 2022 (UTC)

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

We are currently running a study to evaluate the effectiveness of alternative algorithms for providing personalized task recommendations through SuggestBot. Participation in the study is voluntary. Should you wish to not participate in the study, or have questions or concerns, you can find contact information in the consent information sheet.

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day	Quality	Title	Tagged with…
36		International Standard Link Identifier (talk)	Add sources
31		Resolvin (talk)	Add sources
677		Tsinghua University (talk)	Add sources
23		Texas Scottish Rite Hospital for Children (talk)	Add sources
1,564		Fever (talk)	Add sources
440		Ligand (talk)	Add sources
333		Grapefruit–drug interactions (talk)	Cleanup
1,022		On-board diagnostics (talk)	Cleanup
620		Cytochrome P450 (talk)	Cleanup
9		Sterol 14-demethylase (talk)	Expand
52		CNKI (talk)	Expand
6,414		GitHub (talk)	Expand
28		Telerehabilitation (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
159		Ethanol metabolism (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
63		Fructolysis (talk)	Unencyclopaedic
122		ISO 31-0 (talk)	Merge
688		Intergovernmental organization (talk)	Merge
37		Stearoyl-CoA desaturase-1 (talk)	Merge
22		Journal Article Tag Suite (talk)	Wikify
36		Non-mevalonate pathway (talk)	Wikify
29		Blue Button (talk)	Wikify
2		Afsar Maudoodi (talk)	Orphan
4		Alfredo De Massis (talk)	Orphan
3		Borneo Child Aid Society (talk)	Orphan
6		CYP4F3 (talk)	Stub
5		CYP2C18 (talk)	Stub
63		Interested Parties Information (talk)	Stub
42		CAE number (talk)	Stub
19		Annals of Surgery (talk)	Stub
4		John R. Falck (talk)	Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 00:35, 16 September 2022 (UTC)