Jmartin77
Your submission at AfC AdvanFort (2) (September 8)
edit- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/AdvanFort (2).
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! JSFarman (talk) 05:50, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
Hello! Jmartin77,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
|
IRC Help Request
editThe article looks resubmitted to me, you did everything right.--v/r - TP 22:39, 15 October 2013 (UTC)
October 2013
editHello, Jmartin77. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article MV Seaman Guard Ohio, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.
All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.
If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:
- Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
- Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
- Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
- Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.
Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.
For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.
As You've admitted to a conflict of interest over IRC. Please do not edit articles and add unsourced negative information, especially when you have a conflict of interest. v/r - TP 13:40, 16 October 2013 (UTC)
October 2013
editHello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits to MV Seaman Guard Ohio has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.
- ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
- For help, take a look at the introduction.
- The following is the log entry regarding this message: MV Seaman Guard Ohio was changed by Jmartin77 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.856476 on 2013-10-17T13:05:29+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:05, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
This is a second warning to inform you that you are vandalizing the MV Seaman Guard Ohio article and will be reported if you revert again without first making a case through dialogue on the article's talk page 81.240.180.58 (talk) 13:14, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Congrats! You created your Teahouse profile
editWelcome to the Teahouse Badge | |
Awarded to editors who have introduced themselves at the Wikipedia Teahouse. Guest editors with this badge show initiative and a great drive to learn how to edit Wikipedia. | |
Welcome very welcome if you have questions,please feel free to drop me a line!
|
Your recent edits
editHello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 13:55, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Notice
editThere is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is MV Seaman Guard Ohio. Thank you. v/r - TP 14:01, 17 October 2013 (UTC)
Nomination of MV Seaman Guard Ohio incident for deletion
editA discussion is taking place as to whether the article MV Seaman Guard Ohio incident is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/MV Seaman Guard Ohio incident until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:00, 20 October 2013 (UTC)
I have created the article. Thank you for submitting it! This is also to let you know that I am going to insert a section on the MV Seaman Guard Ohio incident there and reduce the treatment of the incident at the ship article to a brief mention. Yngvadottir (talk) 00:05, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
Well I don't think you understand what you're doing. This is an article about ADVANFORT... NOT SG OHIO. Yes you can put the SG OHIO in the article but not in the 1ST PARAGRAPH. Who are you a competing company???Jmartin77 (talk) 01:28, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- the WP:LEAD section of the article covers a summary of the article, highlighting the important aspects of the subject as it has been covered by the reliable sources. To NOT cover the incident in the lead is to violation WP:NPOV by not accurately representing the major (only?) reason the subject has received coverage. -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 02:27, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- JMartin77, I've now put a section about the incident into the article, keeping it as short as possible. If you look at the number of references you can see this has received considerable press coverage; RedPen is correct, it has to be there. What we need now is more about the company. I can see some material about the company's activities in the references you have already used, but I wonder if you can provide any information on the history. For example: who founded the company, and do the names of the ships indicate that it was previously known as Seaman Guard, or that it acquired a company called Seaman Guard? Yngvadottir (talk) 02:35, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
I really don't understand why there needs to be so much in there other than a quick description. SG OHIO is already an article unto itself. Most of the article is about the SG OHIO still. 70.169.167.104 (talk) 18:12, 30 October 2013 (UTC)
- My apologies; I shortened it as much as I could, but I moved the treatment of the incident from the ship article to the company article as being a more appropriate place to put it. As I say, you can help by pointing to more data about the company itself to offset that; I've done some hunting today in both the sources you had and Google News, and added a little bit, but see the questions above, and also if you can find news articles on any other areas the company has operated in, besides Benin, Somalia, and Panama, that would help too. Yngvadottir (talk) 19:33, 30 October 2013 (UTC)