Jjmelborne

February 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at Michael Eric Dyson, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Major newspaper sources are not the only sources that exist, and this section never said he was convicted. Based on your filter log and user page it appears you may have an agenda. jayhawker6 (talk) 15:52, 10 February 2024 (UTC)

I appreciate your feedback. I want to clarify that my intent is not to push an agenda but to ensure that Wikipedia adheres to its Biographies of Living Persons (BLP) policy. The allegations in question are based on sources such as Her Campus, which is a student-run platform and may not meet the standards for reliable sources when addressing serious claims like this. Additionally, the absence of legal or formal outcomes raises concerns about giving undue weight to these allegations. Let's work together to ensure we're following Wikipedia’s guidelines on neutrality and verifiable sourcing. Jjmelborne (talk) 14:47, 28 September 2024 (UTC)