This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi Jj98 ! I'm Supporterheninois, a french contributor. We try, with Eunostos, to improve the article of Alpha and Omega on the french version to a Good article label. We don't find the press release of LionsGate who announced the project of a second movie (Alpha and Omega 2). If you know the reference, please say to me. Excuse me for my english. Good bye. Supporterhéninois (talk) 11:05, 26 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
The Bugle: Issue LXXIII, April 2012
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi, thank you for putting my machinima in Portal:Animation/Selected picture/55. I am still not clear on the purpose of 'selected pictures' on that page. I made another one that you may be interested in: File:CGI Machinima sample film.ogg. I may have to upload it again with no sound track or a different one. I found the soundtrack on a site containing public domain mp3s months/years ago. I misplaced the link to the site although I still have a record of the artists (see talk page for file). The song was written in 1882 and has no copyright today, but I should find the PD permission to the recording I used before I can move it to commons.--Canoe1967 (talk) 17:26, 1 May 2012 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 07 May 2012
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Orphaned non-free media (File:Title-card-Mgpam.jpg)
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:Title-card-Mgpam.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 5 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 04 June 2012
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Orphaned non-free media (File:Courage the Cowardly Dog intertitle.jpg)
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:Courage the Cowardly Dog intertitle.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:06, 17 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
Coordinator sought for the US National Archives WikiProject
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
We are seeking a coordinator to help reboot the project and work on new initiatives! The role is modeled after other Wikiproject coordinators, like the WikiProject Military History coordinators. The coordinator will work with the Wikipedian in Residence to organize and increase participation in the WikiProject, with the goal that the WikiProject is an active space for collaboration maintained by and for the Wikipedia editors, rather than the National Archives.
Please see the full information at Wikipedia:GLAM/NARA/Coordinator and contact me is you have any questions. Feel free to pass this note along to any interested parties. Thanks! Dominic·t 21:04, 19 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 18 June 2012
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Don't know where to talk to so hopefully I'm not intruding. Since it's inactive, I happen to be pretty much the only one (I'm not sure if the other editors on WikiSeinfeld is still active) still working on it and keeping an eye on it. Since there's little choice, I'm going to allow the merge since having more editors is better than less. The only condition is I need help with the Production section so any helpers would be appreciated. Johnnyauau2000 (talk) 10:09, 24 June 2012 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 25 June 2012
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:Ppgz ost.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:01, 12 July 2012 (UTC)Reply
I noticed that you added I-15 in AZ to the portal. We had decided as a group to select four articles to represent the four regions of the country (Northeast, South, West and Midwest) with the added benefit that we had an Interstate, a US Highway, a State Highway and a County Road, all FAs. I'm not opposed to I-15 being listed, but we might want to pick another Midwestern article (U.S. Route 30 in Iowa, a US Highway and part of the Lincoln Highway, one of the auto trails), and maybe something else from the South and the Northeast. Maybe U.S. Route 40 Alternate (Keysers Ridge–Cumberland, Maryland) for a special route out of the south. Unfortunately, we don't have a lot of non-NY choices from the Northeast for FAs, but there is [[State Route 74 (New York–Vermont)] or we could do the A-Class Atlantic City–Brigantine Connector out of New Jersey. (There are two other state highways with A-Class articles from PA and NJ, but I haven't looked to see if they're up to modern standards.) Imzadi 1979→ 16:06, 4 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:Ben10logo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:03, 8 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 13 August 2012
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Really? Start-class for the BrickFair article? I put good effort into it, it well summarizes the event and isn't too long, has good refs, and is well-cited too. ɱ 01:37, 18 August 2012 (UTC)
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
I realise the sandbox is just for experimentation but just in case it is a prerequisite for editing the main template, what is intended with additional needs-image hook? The image-needed code in the template is already complex and takes some keeping in hand. Do we really need more options here? --Traveler100 (talk) 06:50, 18 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Greetings JJ98, I noticed you created a new Category for Future Class United States articles. I wonder if thats needed though. Do you have something in mind that would require this? Kumioko (talk) 19:22, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
Ok, interesting. I hadn't thought about something to denote a future event. Let me bring it up on the project talk page and see who comments. Thanks for the quick response. Kumioko (talk) 23:58, 31 August 2012 (UTC)Reply
The Bugle: Issue LXXVII, August 2012
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Collaboration parameters for Template:WikiProject United States
Latest comment: 11 years ago5 comments2 people in discussion
I need to do a couple of tweaks to the logic of the template and noticed you added parameters for the collaboration. Are you done or are you still working on it? I don't want to mess you up. Kumioko (talk) 23:51, 3 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
No problem, thanks. Once the template changes are implemented I'll convert the articles over and then I will delete the old Collab templates. We probably should have done that a long time ago. Kumioko (talk) 00:04, 4 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Great thanks. I also added the Edit protected template to the talk page requesting an admin update it and do a couple other things. Kumioko (talk) 04:37, 4 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 03 September 2012
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 09:16, 10 September 2012 (UTC)
The Signpost: 10 September 2012
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Greetings JJ. I noticed you were doing some work on the template and the supporting documentation. Thanks for all that. One question though. I was trying to determine what you were attempting to do in the sandbox and I couldn't tell if you were just testing some things over or had a specific goal. I wouldn't suggest implementing the code with the highlighted importance myself but if you think its better we can discuss it on the projects page and see what the group thinks. Again, I wasn't quite sure what the desired outcome was so I thought I would just stop and ask. Kumioko (talk) 00:20, 12 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
A few days you did some corrections to some new WP:TEL categories. I'm wondering whether you know what else I might have done wrong in adding an |importance= parameter to {{WikiProject Telecommunications}}. Importance is not yet appearing in the summary --Kvng (talk) 16:21, 12 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Telecommunications articles by quality and importance
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
JJ98, thank you for all the work that you've done, specifically for {{WikiProject Animation}}. However, I noticed that you have been creating talk pages for a large number of redirects, and adding them to the project. The Redirect-Class should be used primarily for links that were once articles, because they are are now redirected to other articles. While I applaud your intentions, it is not necessary to add EVERY SINGLE redirect to the project, especially for links that are just multiple variations in spelling. Please consider redirecting these pages to the appropriate talk pages, instead of needlessly adding wikiproject banners to talk pages, for redirects that are unlikely to become articles or be discussed separately. Thanks! Fortdj33 (talk) 17:04, 27 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Well, thank you for the notice. JJ98 (Talk) 22:33, 27 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 01 October 2012
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
From what I see on the California Project edit, you've made a useful change. Can you also fix the Clean-up link? The one where I left a note about it being "non-supported" by an inactive bot. The technical aspects are beyond me -- that's why I've left notes asking for help. Thanks. --S. Rich (talk) 22:08, 3 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
WPUS tagging
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
[2] Why does WPUS feel the need to tag everything in sight? This is starting to get a bit annoying. --Rschen7754 07:54, 5 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
The Bugle: Issue LXXVIII, September 2012
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
You're invited! FemTech Edit-a-Thon at Claremont Graduate University
October 26 - FemTech Edit-a-Thon & Roundtable - You are invited!
Everyone is invited to the first FemTech Edit-a-Thon & Roundtable at Claremont Graduate University on October 26 from 3-6 pm. The event will open with a roundtable discussion about feminism and anti-racist technology projects, followed by an edit-a-thon focusing on feminists & women in science. Experienced Wikipedians will be on hand to support new editors. We hope you can join us!
Sign up here - see you there! 01:00, 12 October 2012 (UTC)
Thank you
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Thank you for your help recently in retaining the "featured portal" quality status of Portal:Russia, much appreciated, — Cirt (talk) 05:49, 12 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
Your're welcome. Sometimes I fix portals myself. JJ98 (Talk) 05:21, 13 October 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:Chowder-group.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:00, 8 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Assessment for WP:Judaism?
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi, I noticed you tagged Messianic Judaism as High for both WP:Judaism and Jewish history. Might I ask how you came up with those assessments? From my understanding, MJ'ism doesn't have much to do with Judaism or Jewish history. Maybe I'm misunderstanding project assessments? Cheers... Zad68 19:38, 12 November 2012 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
JJ98, I have to ask again why you think it is necessary to create a talk page for EVERY SINGLE redirect that is part of {{WikiProject Animation}} and now {{WikiProject Star Wars}} as well. Needlessly adding wikiproject banners to talk pages, for redirects that are unlikely to become articles or be discussed separately, serves no purpose other than to clutter up project search lists and quality logs. Again, the Redirect-Class should be used primarily for links that were once articles, because they are are now redirected to other articles. While I applaud your intentions, please consider redirecting these pages to the appropriate talk pages instead, especially for links that are just multiple variations in spelling. Fortdj33 (talk) 05:21, 18 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the clarification, I will sort things out eventually. JJ98 (Talk) 21:48, 18 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 17 December 2012
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A tag has been placed on Talk:Transfomers/Archive 1, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
G6, R3, G8: Misspelt archive title, orphaned
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. -- Patchy1 00:46, 22 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
Barnstar
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
The Seasonal Barnstar
In recognition of your work in the Portal namespace throughout the year, I award you this Seasonal Barnstar. -- John of Reading (talk) 18:07, 22 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thank you. JJ98 (Talk) 18:39, 22 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
The Bugle: Issue LXXXI, December 2012
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Thanks for starting the US Wikiproject in the Commons!
I added Spanish in the page, to help people from Puerto Rico as well as Spanish speaking residents of the US mainland who have little fluency of English
WhisperToMe (talk) 09:37, 30 December 2012 (UTC)Reply
You're welcome, since there are few Geographical WikiProject on Commons, but not many like this project. JJ98 (Talk) 01:52, 3 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 31 December 2012
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
To receive future editions of this newsletter, click here to sign up on the distribution list. This newsletter was delivered by EdwardsBot (talk) 02:46, 9 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 07 January 2013
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A tag has been placed on Template:Non-free television, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Redirect not used in any meaningful fashion
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 22:40, 10 January 2013 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 14 January 2013
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Orphaned non-free media (File:Lok Satta Party Election Symbol.jpg)
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:Lok Satta Party Election Symbol.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:29, 24 February 2013 (UTC)Reply
The Bugle: Issue LXXXIII, February 2013
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Round 1 is now over. The top 64 scorers have progressed to round 2, where they have been randomly split into eight pools of eight. At the end of April, the top two from each pool, as well as the 16 highest scorers from those remaining, will progress to round 3. Commiserations to those eliminated; if you're interested in still being involved in the WikiCup, able and willing reviewers will always be needed, and if you're interested in getting involved with other collaborative projects, take a look at the WikiWomen's Month discussed below.
Round 1 saw 21 competitors with over 100 points, which is fantastic; that suggests that this year's competition is going to be highly competative. Our lower scores indicate this, too: A score of 19 was required to reach round 2, which was significantly higher than the 11 points required in 2012 and 8 points required in 2011. The score needed to reach round 3 will be higher, and may depend on pool groupings. In 2011, 41 points secured a round 3 place, while in 2012, 65 was needed. Our top three scorers in round 1 were:
Miyagawa (submissions), primarily for an array of did you knows and good articles, some of which were awarded bonus points.
Casliber (submissions), due in no small part to Canis Minor, a featured article awarded a total of 340 points. A joint submission with Keilana (submissions), this is the highest scoring single article yet submitted in this year's competition.
Other contributors of note include:
Sven Manguard (submissions), whose Portal:Massachusetts is the first featured portal this year. The featured portal process is one of the less well-known featured processes, and featured portals have traditionally had little impact on WikiCup scores.
Featured topics have still played no part in this year's competition, but once again, a curious contribution has been offered by The C of E (submissions): did you know that there is a Shit Brook in Shropshire? With April Fools' Day during the next round, there will probably be a good chance of more unusual articles...
March sees the WikiWomen's History Month, a series of collaborative efforts to aid the women's history WikiProject to coincide with Women's History Month and International Women's Day. A number of WikiCup participants have already started to take part. The project has a to-do list of articles needing work on the topic of women's history. Those interested in helping out with the project can find articles in need of attention there, or, alternatively, add articles to the list. Those interested in collaborating on articles on women's history are also welcome to use the WikiCup talk page to find others willing to lend a helping hand. Another collaboration currently running is an an effort from WikiCup participants to coordinate a number of Easter-themed did you know articles. Contributions are welcome!
A few final administrative issues. From now on, submission pages will need only a link to the article and a link to the nomination page, or, in the case of good article reviews, a link to the review only. See your submissions' page for details. This will hopefully make updating submission pages a little less tedious. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) J Milburn (talk) 00:48, 1 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
Thanks for your help with unassessed film articles, especially the fact that you are adding them to the appropriate task forces. Much appreciated! Fortdj33 (talk) 15:58, 2 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thank you! JJ98 (Talk) 17:09, 2 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
No problem. Please keep in mind that most the articles left unassessed start with the word "The", therefore they should have the |listas= parameter on the {{WikiProject Film}} banner, so that they are sorted by the second word of the title instead. Fortdj33 (talk) 18:00, 4 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Apple Inc.
Latest comment: 11 years ago3 comments2 people in discussion
I note you changed the priority/importance of this article to the SFBA project. I have been editing the assessments for a while, and still am not quite sure about what constitutes top, high, mid for some articles. can you tell me why you feel its a high, not top priority? I didnt change it from high to top myself, and I dont really doubt you are correct, but id like to hear why, so my future assessments are more accurate (i may even review all the top priority sfba articles and change some to high based on your thoughts).sincerely, Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:05, 7 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Since I rated high importance for WikiProject California, Apple Inc. had 503,883 views on the popular pages of the project, behind San Francisco 49ers and Google, YouTube and Facebook. I had rated Top importance for SFBA two or three months ago, but I dropped back to High importance, while I was assessing to low importance and removed some of the auto parameter from {{WikiProject Apple Inc.}}, since the this was automatically assessed by WikiProject Macintosh three years ago by Xenobot Mk V (talk·contribs) before renaming to WikiProject Apple Inc. This banner can be removed from the scope from the project if the WikiProject does not want it. Also, this importance parameter can be also removed if it does not want it. Check the project's assessment for information or check the banner's documentation on the WikiProject California. JJ98 (Talk) 04:31, 7 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thats very careful observation of the articles relative importance. i may look at popular pages as well to get a better idea where some of the top and high import article rank. thanks, i thought there was a reason.Mercurywoodrose (talk) 03:18, 9 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 04 March 2013
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Orphaned non-free media (File:Hey Arnold title card.jpg)
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:Hey Arnold title card.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:22, 30 March 2013 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 01 April 2013
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hi
You recently edited the Robotics project assessment page. Can you tell me what prompted you to make those edits?
Unfortunately you added C class back into the mix, the robotics project has had a policy of not using C-class for articles and so I have reverted your edits. I would like to add examples, as you did, but would rather the project was at least consulted before such changes are made.
I've added the grading and importance scheme templates since there is a C-Class assessment for WikiProject Robotics, so it can be assessed if there is issues on the article. If you do not like the C-Class, I would remove it from class subpage of the project banner. JJ98 (Talk) 18:05, 8 April 2013 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 08 April 2013
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion,
a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
Latest comment: 11 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Jj, part of assessing articles for Wikiprojects is making sure the Wikiprojects on the page are relevant. Logic education is a redirect that was retargeted from a software program to Outline of Logic. Thus, Wikiproject computers and Wikiproject Apple were no longer relevant. I've replaced both with Wikiproject Philosophy. Ego White Tray (talk) 12:28, 1 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
Alright, fine with me since it had its RFD. I usually assess some of the articles sometime. JJ98 (Talk) 18:37, 1 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 29 April 2013
Latest comment: 11 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:Opus CMS logo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:31, 22 May 2013 (UTC)Reply
The Bugle: Issue LXXXVI, May 2013
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
Hello again! It appears that Cartoon Network articles are being moved to their own project, instead of just being a work group of {{WikiProject Animation}}. While I admire the work that you are doing with these articles, please don't just arbitrarily remove the Animation banner from them. I realize that {{WikiProject Cartoon Network}} covers more than just animation, but if the article is still animation-related, please just remove the Cartoon Network parameters, and add the Cartoon Network banner instead. Thanks! Fortdj33 (talk) 14:18, 5 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
I replied at your talk page. JJ98 (Talk) 16:49, 5 June 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago4 comments2 people in discussion
Hello again! Just as you did in moving Cartoon Network articles to their own project, it appears that you are now moving articles to {{WikiProject Nickelodeon}}, instead of them just being a work group of {{WikiProject Animation}}. Again, while I admire the work that you are doing with these articles, please don't just arbitrarily remove the Animation banner from them. If the article is still animation-related, please just remove the "|nicktoons=yes" parameter, and add the Nickelodeon banner instead. Thanks! Fortdj33 (talk) 23:39, 3 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
I barely just started moving some of the Nicktoons articles, along with the SpongeBob SquarePants articles from the Animation banner, since it had a GA, although its not quite very higher then Adventure Time since people don't really care for SpongeBob and Nickelodeon anymore since I've nominated Nicktoons for deletion and redirected to List of programs broadcast by Nickelodeon. Plus it would take me about two or three weeks to remove from the Animation and add to the Nickelodeon banner. JJ98 (Talk) 06:57, 4 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
Right, I'm just saying that for articles about Spongebob and other animated shows on Nickelodeon, it's not necessary for you to remove the Animation banner altogether. Please just remove the Nicktoons parameter, and replace it by adding the Nickelodeon banner. Fortdj33 (talk) 14:31, 4 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
I'm on it! JJ98 (Talk) 18:35, 4 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 10 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion
A tag has been placed on File:Lok Satta Party Election Symbol.jpg, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
This image is used on the website listed, which lists all of its contents as subject to copyright. Unless evidence is presented otherwise, doesn't that, by default, make it a copyrighted image?
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. 120.56.132.244 (talk) 13:13, 4 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
Thanks for the notice, but it has been declined quickly. JJ98 (Talk) 18:36, 4 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 07 August 2013
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 2004 in animation, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Teletoon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:03, 15 August 2013 (UTC)Reply
The Signpost: 14 August 2013
Latest comment: 10 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
Thanks for uploading File:Title-card-Mgpam.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Previous issue | Index | Next issue 
FA
GA
Template:Nicktoons guidelines has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. 70.24.250.26 (talk) 07:14, 24 November 2012 (UTC)
Sturmvogel_66 (submissions), primarily for an array of warship GAs.
Miyagawa (submissions), primarily for an array of did you knows and good articles, some of which were awarded bonus points.
Casliber (submissions), due in no small part to Canis Minor, a featured article awarded a total of 340 points. A joint submission with 
Keilana (submissions), this is the highest scoring single article yet submitted in this year's competition.
Sven Manguard (submissions), whose Portal:Massachusetts is the first featured portal this year. The featured portal process is one of the less well-known featured processes, and featured portals have traditionally had little impact on WikiCup scores.
Sasata (submissions), whose Mycena aurantiomarginata was the first featured article this year.
Muboshgu (submissions) and 
Wizardman (submissions), who both claimed points for articles in the Major League Baseball tie-breakers topic, the first topic points in the competition.
Toa Nidhiki05 (submissions), who claimed for the first full good topic with the Casting Crowns studio albums topic.
The C of E (submissions): did you know that there is a Shit Brook in Shropshire? With April Fools' Day during the next round, there will probably be a good chance of more unusual articles...
You are invited to join the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Meetup/LA/SDCC1. RightCowLeftCoast (talk) 18:17, 18 April 2013 (UTC)
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
){kind=link}
