Jimmy oh

July 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Super Mario Bros.. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TJ Spyke 00:01, 22 July 2009 (UTC)

Someone can not call themselves an expert in something (you have a big ego if you do), someone else has to. You have no source to back up your claim, and a claim like that will not be allowed. Do you see something like Encyclopedia Brittanica accepting unverified claims from random people? No, because they also only allow sourced info. Don't try and claim that it hurts Wikipedia's credibility by not allowing unsourced claims from random people to remain in the article. If you can find a reliable source (see WP:V) that supports your claim, maybe it can go back in. I was correct in deleting your unsourced claim. TJ Spyke 15:19, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Egotistical, arrogant, and delusional. Quite a trifecta. I don't care what you think, I was right in removing your unsourced claim. Any other experienced editor would have done the same thing. If you ever find a reliable source, I will discuss this again. TJ Spyke 18:12, 23 October 2009 (UTC)