This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Golbez 11:25, 26 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

WTF? I've been helpful lately.

I saw you misspelling a word [1] which led me to see numerous vandalisms in your previous edits [2] [3]. However, there were a few valid edits in there too, which is why I merely warned you. Don't do it again. --Golbez 21:40, 27 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Yeah, when I registered, I was just gonna vandalize, but I decided not too.

You just did. --Golbez 22:07, 27 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

No I didn't. Your sandbox doesn't count, it's a sandbox.

It's my page that I have named a sandbox. Use the public one. --Golbez 22:59, 27 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

James "Mike" Peters

edit

I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article James "Mike" Peters, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Walton Vivat Regina! 16:01, 31 March 2007 (UTC)Reply

Vandalism

edit
 

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Deaths in 2007, you will be blocked from editing.

OK kid, byebye. --Golbez 02:53, 29 April 2007 (UTC)Reply