User talk:Jimanczur/sandbox

Latest comment: 6 years ago by Itorres06 in topic Peer Review

Peer Review

edit

1. After reading Jimanczur's sandbox proposal and taking a look at the original Wikipedia article, I was impressed. There was close to no information on the original article, and it was extremely difficult to imagine what a writeprint is. I believe that my peer did a good job of not only explaining what it is, but also included several important aspects of the analyzation of a writeprint, such as lexical and syntactic features, and more.

2. The only suggestion that I can think of would be changing the phrase "can provide" to "provides", as to make it more objective and emphasize that a writeprint truly provides this information.

3. One thing that I thought of that my peer could mention in the article would be noteworthy cases in which writeprints were used, or maybe some noteworthy people who are experts in writeprints. Since I am working on Robert A. Leonard, I wonder if he ever worked with or analyzed writeprints! I will look into that!

Itorres06 (talk) 17:02, 29 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

Peer Review

edit

1. Although the article is short, it does define what "writeprint" is pretty clearly and gives examples of what would be considered "writeprint." For me, the examples helped me understand what "writeprint" is the best so maybe expand on those examples.

2. There is definitely a lot that can be expanded on in this article. I would suggest expanding on the examples of what is considered "writeprint" because I found those helpful in understanding what "writeprint" exactly is. I would also suggest writing about the development of the theory of "writeprint." Who are the forensic linguists who are developing it? Are there any experiments that have been done relating to "writeprint"? Is the theory being applied in the real world of forensic linguistics? I think these questions would be interesting to expand upon.

3. The most important thing the author could do to improve this article is expansion. Wikipedia does seem to like short articles and refers to them as "stubs." There seems to be a lot of interesting ideas being introduced in this article that could be expanded on in greater detail.

User:Averyfieldx