User talk:Jim1138/Archive 23

Archive 20

Archive 21

Archive 22

Archive 23

Archive 24

Archive 25

→

Archive 30

Cootie Catcher link

Hello Jim,

I just saw that you removed the link to my web page for my cootie catcher app from the "[fortune teller]". Please reconsider adding it back because I think users of this page would like to know about my Cootie Catcher App just as much as the other external links.

Thanks, Mike Hempfling

```` — Preceding unsigned comment added by 98.226.86.135 (talk) 19:53, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

I think the link to my Cootie Catcher app has just as much relevance as the other links. Both other links ultimately are to hopefully make money off of the user. The momsminivan.com web site is making money from ads on the site and the pbskids.org is trying to raise brand awareness for Arthur so they can sell all their brand items or get you to another part of their site to sell something else. Please reconsider.

Thanks, Mike 98.226.86.135 (talk) 00:08, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Both the other links have direct relevance to and support the article. While the "how to make" does have ads (though not pushing product of its own that I can see) and is perhaps questionable, the PBS is not. If you feel the app is significant, I would suggest writing an article. Again, if I were to restore it, someone else would undo it. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 00:16, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello!

Hello Jim,

Thanks for contacting!
Well, I'm new to this, and I was trying to create a disambiguation page on Autodigest. I thought I had followed the directions but it did go terribly wrong... Then I was just trying to get it back to how it was and figure out how to do it properly.
Could you help me with this? I'm trying to edit the article on Crónica Electrónica. I copied it to my sandbox to have a go at it before I send it live.
However, I noticed that there were some links that were linking to a similar but different thing (namely Autodigest). So I thought I'd start there and create disambiguation pages. Only it was harder than I thought.

Thank you!

Marianaowen1 (talk) 00:34, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for having my back

Thank you for your reversion on my talk page. Optakeover<sup>(Talk)</sup> 05:35, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Jim

Hey jim will i be able to make my own article ? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jaden24 (talk • contribs) 05:44, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Hello, Jim1138. You have new messages at Optakeover's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

I just don't see Cole being 30 years old. He doesn't look it, I don't find it realistic. 18 when he graduated college? How could that be? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saira b78 (talk • contribs) 11:25, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

I just don't see Cole being 30 years old. He doesn't look it, I don't find it realistic. 18 when he graduated college? How could that be? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saira b78 (talk • contribs) 11:26, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi

Hi, are you the owner of Wikipedia? I do not believe that the information according to his birth date is correct. This site is not a reliable trustworthy source, honestly. I find it impossible for Cole Swindell to be 30, unless you have supporting evidence. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saira b78 (talk • contribs) 02:10, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Your Uncle Dodge seems to think he is thirty as well. here. If you have a wp:rs that states he is not 30, then feel free to to change it. With citations, of course. If you find RS that nobody has the answer, then maybe his birthday should be removed. However, please don't change his birthday to your best guess. BTW: do you expect enhanced cooperation from your first sentence? Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 02:18, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

I feel as his birthday should be removed, then. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saira b78 (talk • contribs) 02:34, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

"Enhanced cooperation"... What do you mean? I asked if you're the owner. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Saira b78 (talk • contribs) 02:38, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Before removing the information, I would suggest posting a proposal on talk:Cole Swindell. Other people might know of a source for his real age and then the correct information can be added to the article. Or, you might get agreement on the uncertainty and more support for removal. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 02:52, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

As far as I can tell, there is no good public source, but I can assure you he was not born in 1989. The would mean he graduated college at 18. At this point, it seems best to leave the birthday information blank, at least the year. The correct birthdate is June 30, 1983, but I think that only the June 30 bit is publicly supported and that information comes only from Cole's Twitter feed. 128.205.172.109 (talk) 18:16, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

Vandalism

Hi The user http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Jsqqq777 is engaged in vandalism

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/%C3%89lie_Metchnikoff http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fyodor_Pirotsky — Preceding unsigned comment added by 193.169.80.41 (talk) 18:25, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

upload the display picture of Govinda(actor)

hi dear, it is my humble request for you to Please upload the display picture of Govinda(actor) on Wikipedia (Link is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Govinda_%28actor%29). I have uploaded it so many times but every time some issue occurs regarding license or copyright. I don't know how to fix it or upload image successfully. You can find best pictures of Govinda here

http://themirchmasala.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/govinda-photoshoot.jpg

http://hamaraphotos.com/albums300_2012/wpw-20130504/hpse_normal__1644962347_%20Govinda%20photo%20shoot%20for%20designer%20Suprabha%20Jain%20%289%29.jpg

So it would be much better if you upload either the pictures whose link i have given above of Govinda without any licensing/copyright issue or upload any best picture of Govinda Thank you — Preceding unsigned comment added by Amanraj6 (talk • contribs) 20:32, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

That appears to be a copyrighted image. Permission from the copyright holder would need to be communicated to Wikipedia before it could be uploaded. Perhaps you could ask Govinda for a public domain photo? (Permission would also need to be communicated to Wikipedia). So, I don't have permission to upload it. Best of luck. Jim1138 (talk) 22:18, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

A beer for you!

Thanks for reverting the vandalism on my talk page! Drm310 (talk) 23:56, 24 January 2014 (UTC)

apologize

I am sorry for misusing the Wikipedia. How to make any sources in edit? 103.9.114.58 (talk) 05:21, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Sorry to Jim1138 for talk-page stalking, but to 103.9.114.58, please see WP:REFBEGIN and WP:CS for instructions on how to properly cite sources. And thanks to you for making the effort to actually cite sources for your contributions. Many users simply ignore the warnings we give them. —Josh3580<sub>talk/hist</sub> 05:27, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

How to create a new article, Jim1138? 103.9.114.58 (talk) 05:46, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

complaining you

Sir, your user A Flat is threatening me. They are framing me as I am personal attacker. Please take him an action. Thank you, sir. 103.9.114.58 (talk) 06:21, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

103.9.114.58's edits

I am trying my best to assist this user, but it is very tedious, given the obvious language barrier, and the lack of other editors active right now. Any ideas/suggestions? He's really trying to help, but I'm not sure how to keep cleaning up here. —Josh3580<sub>talk/hist</sub> 06:04, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

I take the "good-faith" comment back, now. diff —Josh3580<sub>talk/hist</sub> 06:20, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Why you framing me? How I become a tedious and offensive? Please, compromise me. 103.9.114.58 (talk) 06:24, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Jim1138. You have new messages at Josh3580's talk page.
Message added 06:26, 25 January 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

 —Josh3580<sub>talk/hist</sub> 06:26, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

You are now a reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

• Wikipedia:Reviewing, the guideline on reviewing
• Wikipedia:Pending changes, the summary of the use of pending changes
• Wikipedia:Protection policy#Pending changes protection, the policy determining which pages can be given pending changes protection by administrators. 15:37, 25 January 2014 (UTC)
   — Berean Hunter (talk)

Rapsody

That's fine and all but... The original text has no source and is false...............

FaceOffTournament (talk) 21:18, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

Vandalism

Hey, man. I'm sorry about editing that wiki page and stuff. I'm over it now. Will i get into any legal trouble or anything? I really am sorry about that. I'll seriously stop.

Swatstone (talk) 10:30, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Harini (Kannada actress)

Hi Jim...... Actually I created an article with name Harini (Kannada Actress). But some one has linked that article to Harini (Kannada actress). I got an message the the article Harini (Kannada Actress) will be deleted due to similarities of the names of two articles i mentioned above. I don't want Harini (Kannada Actress) to be deleted. So I request you to delete the article Harini (Kannada actress) . Please don' t delete first article . Kannadacinema (talk) 11:01, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

I have now cited the In-Report journal as a source of "Response to Criticism" in The Institutes for the Achievement of Human Potential. Will this be acceptable now? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr. Samuel Goldstein (talk • contribs) 11:44, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

IP at Frank Collin

Going through his/her recent edits I found such things as calling the German Social Democratic Party and the German Green party "communist anti-German political parties" and Avon Cosmetics a pyramid scheme - given the previous blocks I gave him a 2 week block. Dougweller (talk) 11:47, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Institutes for the Achievement of Human Potential

Dear Jim,

Thanks you for your comments regarding my updates related to The Institutes for the Achievement of Human Potential. I must admit that as a new user on Wikipedia, I am still figuring things out. I am not related to The Institutes. I am an independent physician who has seen first hand the great results of their programs. I fully appreciate your point on neutrality. However, if you read the article, much of it is not written in a neutral tone, rather with high negative bias. If you do a simple Google search about The Institutes, you will find that 80% of the views out there (blogs etc) are highly positive. Given this case, it does not seem neutral that 80% of the Wikipedia entry is negative. Can you please suggest how best to edit this article to represent a more balanced point of view? I attempted to start to do this with at least adding a small section called, "Response to Criticism." I have now cited The In-Report journal as the source. Is this sufficient?

Best Regards, Dr. Samuel Goldstein — Preceding unsigned comment added by Dr. Samuel Goldstein (talk • contribs) 11:54, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks, Jim. It was indeed a typo and it was me who deleted the Glenn doman article! :-) Deb (talk) 13:32, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Saturn Awards page

This is starting to get frustrating, I'm not some good faith bumbling idiot, the newer page, despite having a great bunch of templates, and more information, lists COMPLETELY the wrong actresses. If you want to go through and write a new good looking page that lists the correct winners and nominees then please go ahead. If you however, like me, lack the time or inclination to do so then I suggest you revert this edit tagged as "unexplained content removal" and perhaps read the edit summaries of revisions you revert in future, before labelling them as unexplained.

78.145.60.245 (talk) 13:21, 26 January 2014 (UTC) - some IP guy

It's cool, sorry for being such an ass about it too haha 78.145.60.245 (talk) 13:44, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Thomas John Barnardo: alternative text

Hello Jim1138. I can supply some background to the text removed with this edit. I included it when I inserted the infobox years ago. It was my attempt to provide useful information for visually impaired readers, without merely duplicating the caption, and based on my understanding of WP:ALT at the time. What constitutes good alt text is certainly up for discussion, so I'd welcome any improvement to my initial effort. Please would you consider editing it rather than removing it, as the alt text is important for some readers? Thanks. – Wdchk (talk) 13:43, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Undone. Thanks for letting me know. May I suggest adding a comment: something like <!--FOR VISUALLY IMPAIRED-->? It might prevent other edits from disappearing. Cheers! Jim1138 (talk) 13:49, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for your prompt response. I'll certainly consider your suggestion of adding a comment, and I can see how it would be helpful. A possible concern, though, is it might be perceived by other editors as a departure from normal infobox practice. It's a bigger thing than just you and me and this one infobox. Let me think about it. Cheers. – Wdchk (talk) 14:03, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

I've added lots of comments and never had any complaints. Shall I add one with Thomas John Barnardo? Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 14:05, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

You would not receive a complaint from me. Thanks. – Wdchk (talk) 14:10, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

do not include invasive or security risking information!

you continue to post invasive and security risking information. The information you continue to provide gives pedophiles and easier way to reach our family. I will have to notify the police if you continue to put up information about our family tree, where Jackie attends school, etc. if you continue to do so. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Its.anewday2b (talk • contribs) 14:13, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Jackie evancho edits

To the person who just replied. I am Jackie's mother and WILL notify the police if you continue to include information on family tree, schools, etc. I would have replied to you directly, but there wasn't a button to click to reply to you. I see no conflict of interest where the security of my daughter and our family is concerned. I am not threatening legal action. I am notifying you of the only course of action I see possible if you can't be reasonable. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Its.anewday2b (talk • contribs) 14:32, 26 January 2014 (UTC)

Laughter Yoga

Hello Jim,

I've tried to reinstate laughter yoga back on. There are plenty of sources online if you are looking for a source. It's been on TV and all over the world with millions of people, why have you suddenly decided that it should be forwarded to yoga and exercise?

Kind regards

Nihat — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ntsolak (talk • contribs) 08:49, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

MansourJE (talk) 09:18, 27 January 2014 (UTC)sir i did NOT do it intentionally

Jim please help on laughter yoga

Hi Jim,

Please help to restore the original content as it was before, I will work to get it referenced properly. I tried to unto the redirect and did a bit of edits, it won't allow me to do it.

Many thanks

Nihat — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ntsolak (talk • contribs) 09:41, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Ref: Roizman

Hi Jim1138

I made an attempt to contact the site management but it seems that language barrier is the problem and I did something not right I would lому to know what is the procedure of submitting information on Wikipedia. It seems that there is no rules and anyone can publish anything they want. I just found the incorrect information and wanted to replace it with the correct one. Also I inserted the links of articles which prove that info I submitted is correct. It will be very disappointing if Wikipedia allows anyone publish false information

Thank you

Dear Sir / Madam,

I have removed some information about Mr Roizman since it contained false accusations that may damage his reputation. The fact that he belongs to Russian oppisition groups and "known as a campaigner against corrupt police, illegal drug sellers and for drug rehab centers. working under the huge pressure" makes him uncomfortable for Government officials. During the Mayor election campain in July-September 2013 he was working under an enormous pressure when officials using mass media tried to create the image of him as a mafia boss accused in kidnapping, drug dealing, etc. , in order to prevent his election. The TV report you mentioned was a part of the dirty campain. At the moment Yevgeny filed the lawsuite against the creators of the TV report. Unfortunately for them, the majority of the Yekaterinburg population knows Yevgeny as a Phd in History, a member of "Union of writers". He set the "Nevyansk icon museum" with free admission. He's opened several rehab centers for drug addicts and never asked for and never been granted any money from the Government. He is a Mayor of people and that was the reason why he won the election. Here are some links which might be helpful to visualise a real Roizman http://www.themoscowtimes.com/opinion/article/how-yevgeny-roizman-became-mayor/486235.html http://www.theguardian.com/world/2013/sep/13/new-mayor-russia-fourth-largest-city-not-putins-opposition http://www.rferl.org/content/russia-yekaterinburg-mayor-roizman/25100514.html

Thank you very much.

Yours faithfully Dmitry Pavlov — Preceding unsigned comment added by Surfer x (talk • contribs) 16:58, 27 January 2014 (UTC)

Thanks

Thanks for noticing the vandalism to my user page and reverting it - again. This vandalism is somewhat puzzling since I did not revert an edit from that IP address. Most logically, I suppose, we might surmise that this IP has edited from another computer or has a dynamic IP - and has some grudge from previous reversions. I would not be surprised if the previous vandalism was quite recent. I reverted a vandalism that inserted some generic gallery images earlier this morning. That was one of the types of vandalism here. Donner60 (talk) 05:47, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Hi Jim I wasn't leaving personal commentary on the Anthroposophical Medicine, I was in the process of editing a biased article and referencing all updates when you reverted my edits. Please don't be so hasty to revert edits — Preceding unsigned comment added by Rebfam (talk • contribs) 06:01, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

I did184.190.80.94 (talk) 06:54, 28 January 2014 (UTC) you guys are ridiculous

Your opinion on my editing

Hello Jim1138 I don't agree with your opinion of my editing of the Anthroposophical Medicine page, with whom can I seek further counsel? The portions of the page I removed were biased in portraying it as a form of quackery. I do NOT consider this 'destructive editing'. Please compare with the Anthroposophical Pharmacy page for a strongly different tone. At the least this should be a neutral article and not conveying a strong tone of judgement as the article currently does. Rebfam (talk) 11:14, 28 January 2014 (UTC)

Note

Thank you for the update

Mere124 (talk) 01:01, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Saraiki Language

It is conform that Saraiki is a language. Also Jhangvi dialect is dialect of Saraiki. Riasti dialect, Shah puri dialect,Multani dialect, Multani language, Thalochi dialect, Thalochi ,Derawali dialect are same. I suggest merging these articles , as the all these are same. And also be Redirected to Saraiki language.

Extended content

Kindly See these External Links http://www.ethnologue.com/show_language.asp?code=skr http://globalrecordings.net/en/language/16338 http://votebits.com/sweet-and-interesting-languages-of-pakistan/ http://www.ankarascene.com/haber/pakistan-823.html http://thepolyglotexperience.blogspot.com/2011/01/pakistan-language-map.html http://languagemaps.wordpress.com/2012/11/30/languages-of-pakistan/ http://mazhar.dk/pakistan/ http://www.dostpakistan.pk/geography/languages/ http://www.absoluteastronomy.com/topics/Ethnic_groups_in_Pakistan http://siraiki.blogspot.com/2013/12/languages-of-punjab.html Department of Saraiki, Islamia University, Bahawalpur was established in 1989 and Department of Saraiki, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan was established in 2006. Saraiki is taught as subject in schools and colleges at higher secondary, intermediate and degree level. Allama Iqbal open university Islamabad, and Al-Khair university Bhimbir have their Pakistani Linguistics Departments. They are offering M.Phil. and Ph.D in Saraiki. Five T V channels and Ten Radio Stations are Serving Saraiki language Twenty distracts in punjab, Pakistan and two distracts from Khyber-Pakhtunkhwa Province, Pakistan are saraiki speaking area. Bahawalnagar Bahawalpur Bhakkar Chiniot Dera Ghazi Khan Dera Ismail Khan Jhang Khanewal Khushab Layyah Lodhran Mianwali Multan Muzaffargarh Pakpattan Rahim Yar Khan Rajanpur Sahiwal Sargodha Tank Toba Tek Singh Vehari Frontier Region Tank Frontier Region Dera Ismail Khan These distracts are also Saraiki Chakwal Hafizabad Mandi Bahauddin Okara Fazilka Sri Ganganagar Saraiki is spoken in India, United Arab Emirates and Afghanistan also. Saraiki is second largest language in Kingdom of Saudi Arabia with more than 2.5M. In United Kingdom. Saraiki is spoken by 400,000. In Canada, China, South Africa and United States saraiki is also spoken.

182.186.111.216 (talk) 16:21, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Note [1]. --NeilN <sup>talk to me</sup> 16:25, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

Margaret Sanger Award

The abortion issue must not be made more-difficult by disingenuous and obfuscatory language. There are two common phrases used to describe the proponents of the majority of the issue's advocates: "pro-life" and "pro-choice." "Pro-life" is generally a more-coherent term than "pro-choice." The former generally believe that 98% plus abortions are wrong while at the same time (in the majority of cases for evangelical Protestants but not Roman Catholics) some might say, hypocritically supporting the death penalty. Using the same metric, one cannot justify the term "pro-choice" when describing followers of Margaret Sanger and Planned Parenthood. "Choice" implies a state of near-indifference; a position wherein no outcome is really to be preferred. But that is not the case. Planned Parenthood is America's largest abortion provider with fewer than one adoption referral for every hundred abortion referrals. Planned Parenthood is just as much in the abortion business as the Pope is in the religion business -- and the Pope is clearly Pro Life in every sense of the phrase. And I say this as an evangelical Protestant. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.111.87.246 (talk) 22:29, 29 January 2014 (UTC)

West Liberty Iowa page edits

Dear Jim,

I am an historian who has begun to add information to the page of West Liberty, Iowa. Will you please verify that you are a person with authority to revert my edits? Do you live in West Liberty? If so, you would know that the new mayor of West Liberty is Bob Hartman.

J Lekato — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jlekato (talk • contribs) 00:00, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Kirk Sommer

Thank you for your edit, unfortunately the SPA keeps deleting all tags without improving the article. Edward321 (talk) 01:24, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Hii

Hey man someone removed awards section so i take it back and chaged current episode someone removed ref also for that so keeping it again

Thanks — Preceding unsigned comment added by Bhushanbihani (talk • contribs) 09:50, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Sorry

Sorry I was testing :( 14.139.98.10 (talk) 09:58, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

removal of my added text taken from a reliable source (La Scena Musicale, reference)

Dear Jim, I do not understand why you are removing my text from a reliable source: La Scena Musicale, to explain the divergence in opinions. Gabala (talk) 10:18, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

As I stated on your page, it is your job to cite sources. Not mine (and others) to find them. Jim1138 (talk) 10:24, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Non-civil

There is nothing "non-civil" about my comments. The editors on this page are clearly white supremicist who have no intention of allowing the TRUTH about who the Moors really were be known to people who live in the United States. Everyone here in Europe knows that the original Moors were of the Black race and currently the article does not paint this picture at all. All pictures in addition to the text specifically excludes any reference to the Black Race. Please see below the same exact reference that other editors have cited however its a different portion of the book so why would you allows the inclusion of this resource for their information and not for mine. It is clear that racism is at work with your suggested edits. http://shazereverquar.files.wordpress.com/2013/04/4-golden-age-of-the-moor.pdf Pages 3 and 4 clearly outline this racial "myth" which is highly controversial amongst the Black North Africans like myself. If Wikipedia is supposed to an objective encyclopedia then it need to inform people of both perspectives , the scientific one versus the scientific racism version. This is also been proven true by the way that the Hamitic people are reflected in Wikipedia. Refer to that article as it clearly uses the words " scientific racism" and states that this is not proven theory. This is the type of language I am trying to insert in this article. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Truth777333 (talk • contribs) 10:51, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Calling an editor a racist is a personal attack Jim1138 (talk) 11:09, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Moksha

Hello. You have quite rightly asked for a source for my edit to moksha. I wondered if the Oxford Dictionary of World Religions would do? There it is defined as "The fourth and ultimate artha (goal) of Hinduism" (page 650). Moksha is also present as a concept in Buddhism. For example, the monastic code in Buddhism is called pratimoksha meaning 'towards moksha', moksha being conceived as the end of the Buddhist path too. Perhaps you would be kind enough to let me know before I add the source and revert. Many thanks. 81.106.127.14 (talk) 07:43, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

I would think Oxford would be wp:RS and I would be satisfied (hopefully others would be as well). Do you need any assitance in creating a citation? Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 07:52, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

I have my questions with "The Oxford". Frankly, you've been using that source so amny times; why don't you try to look a little bit further? This being said, it sounds quite correct what you're mentiioning here regarding Hinduism. Regarding Buddhism, "moksha" is not the common terminology in Buddhism, though I do understand your logic. "Nirvana" seems to be the common term. I did a little Google-search, and came across this quote:

"The Buddhist concept of nirvana is subtly different from the Upanishadic concept of moksha." (Sugata Bose, Ayesha Jalal (2004), Modern South Asia: History, Culture, Political Economy, Taylor & Francis)

Unfortunately, there is no copy of the book available at Google books, so I can't check the context of this quote. But it gives an indication, I think. Best regards, Joshua Jonathan -Let's talk! 10:16, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Your cited source is by two political historians with no expertise in Indian religion. But you must yourself know that the code for monastics in Buddhism is called the pratimoksha. It means 'that which leads towards liberation'. Nirvana is the quality of mind possessed by one who has attained moksha. It is unconditioned (asankhata) consciousness because it is free from sankharas or sanskaras as they are called in Hinduism. There is no difference between the moksha of Jainism, Hinduism or Buddhism - with all three you have taken away the causes for incarnation into a material realm and you have attained nirvana - a description of the pristine, purified mind used in all three traditions. As for 'The Oxford' as you call it, it was written by leading international scholars - in this particular instance Gavin Flood. 81.106.127.14 (talk) 12:20, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Copied to Talk:Moksha#Goal of spiritual life To be continued there

Jake LaMotta additions

Jim,

I was shocked to see my addition to Jake LaMotta's page removed. I am Robert Cipriano and I was the Manager of Jake LaMotta between 1981-1985. I did finance with my companies L'Etoile Talent Agency and Capri Management the documentary The Real Raging Bull. Portrait of a Champ with Chris Anderson and Director Delia Fernandez Rey. What more citation do you need Robert Cipriano ~ ~ ~ ~ — Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.50.176.119 (talk) 18:28, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Reference

Hi Jim1138, Would it be O.K to add my site to the Reference area of an Article? Thanks, Iunex.d (talk) 19:07, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

A response to your message

I'd prefer to have my information kept private. I have been personally targeted as well as the company I work for due to what others think I can do for them. I'd appreciate it if you deleted my information as I tried to do.

Thank you,

Eirg (talk) 19:24, 30 January 2014 (UTC)Ethan

Hi

Sorry Jim1138, I will not do this ever again! My Apologies. Iunex.d (talk) 19:35, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

New

Hello Jim,

Sorry if i made some mistake by adding inapropriate subject. I am new on the place so forgive my mistakes.

I will read the guideline to do not repeat my mistakes.

Thanks for understanding.

Fais. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Faisal J Aweys (talk • contribs) 23:52, 30 January 2014 (UTC)

Email Question

Hey Jim, thanks for posting a link to admin to remove my logged out IP edit. You mentioned you would have emailed me if I had one linked. How do I do that? Thanks a bunch. Chrismfrench (talk) 06:02, 31 January 2014 (UTC)