JillandJack

Note: This is a reincarnation of banned User:DW

Have you tried having the password emailed to you? That worked for me. :) Jwrosenzweig 19:12, 12 Mar 2004 (UTC)

Vanderbilt

Not really; as the default position of the side toolbar is on the left, the first image of an article is usually placed on the right. Otherwise things look a tad claustrophobic (especially at lower resolutions), as the eyes expect to see text on the left. The article is not yet long enough for a centered or left-aligned image, anyway. Cheers, -- Hadal 20:15, 1 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Furness

The peerage lists are not complete. UK and Irish Viscountcies must still be added to List of Viscountcies. -- Emsworth 16:43, Apr 7, 2004 (UTC)

Alain Robert

Hi. Just wanted to say that I liked the article, and wanted to know where you got the picture. I'm tempted to suggest it as a featured image, if by some chance it's original. Isomorphic 04:57, 17 Apr 2004 (UTC)

Misspelled article titles

Rather than request their deletion, make them redirects to the correct spellings. Someone will make that spelling mistake again and possibly recreate the wrong-named article if they are deleted. —Morven 22:03, 20 Apr 2004 (UTC)

RE the article on Margaret Trudeau

Latest comment: 20 years ago2 comments2 people in discussion

I was about to insert a book cover with her image but saw where one had been removed by User:Angela: (cur) (last) . . 23:06, 17 Nov 2003 . . Angela (remove photo - see Wikipedia:Possible copyright infringements) - However, while doing the biography for Errol Flynns wife, Lili Damita, I see that the Image: ErrollFlynn.jpg "Cover of My Wicked, Wicked Ways, by Erroll Flynn" was inserted by a Wikipedia Administrator, User:Zoe -- Can someone clarify this? Should I delete Flynn or insert Trudeau? JillandJack 16:56, 21 May 2004 (UTC)Reply

The removal of the Trudeau image isn't material to your case - it was removed on its own merits. Similarly, the Flynn one remains in its. Hopefully what you upload will be acceptable under the "fair use" doctrine - take a look at Wikipedia:Fair use for pointers as to what is and isn't fair use. Fair use is, however, problematic, so it would be better if you can find a public domain image of her, or can persuade the owner of some image to grant us licence to use it here - see Wikipedia:Boilerplate request for permission for sample letters/emails to send. Oh, and my compliments on checking this matter out so thoroughly. -- Finlay McWalter | Talk 23:28, 21 May 2004 (UTC)Reply

Each case of fair use needs to be dealt with separately. The Trudeau image description page made no claim of fair use and was felt inappropriate for this, and other reasons, when it was listed for deletion. Angela .

I moved this from the village pump in case you hadn't seen it yet. Angela . 14:05, May 26, 2004 (UTC)

Hi, I wonder where you got that image of William Kissen Vanderbilt? Someone wants a bigger version, higher resolution. Jimbo Wales 18:49, 1 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Kentucky boosting?

Are you from Kentucky,J and J?...you have this thing for always specifying that that Belmont-hopefuls' prep race at Churchill Downs is "the most prestigious" event in thoroughbred racing... L.E./12.144.5.2/le@put.com

Should I sing "My Old Kentucky Home" for you?

Images for deletion

Just a note, images go on images for deletion Dunc_Harris|☺ 19:13, 3 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Emile Nelligan pic

Thanks for tracking down and uploading a picture of Emile Nelligan. I started the article, and I am a fan. Smerdis of Tlön 21:02, 8 Jun 2004 (UTC)

List of Jews page

Hi, recently you entered names into the List of Jews page. However something went wrong as in the process you messed up the page and almost the entire page was showing things twice over, so I had to revert it. Please re-enter the names you wanted to, but please do it CAREFULLY as there are many names on that page, but THEY ARE well-organized, so take care when you add your names to it. Thanks. IZAK 12:31, 11 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Saint-Jean-Baptiste Society

Hello Jill and/or Jack. How are you? You recently added two sentences to the Saint-Jean-Baptiste Society. One is:

Some of its leaders adopted extreme positions, declaring that the use of the English language should be banned completely in Quebec.

This one is quite a big generalization. Do you have the name(s) of the leader(s) and the quote(s) which would validate such a statement? In which publication(s) did you read this opinion?

The second one is:

Gilles Rheaume, a former president of the Saint-Jean-Baptiste Society, walked from Montreal to Quebec City where he urinated on the statue of British General James Wolfe, who defeated French General Louis-Joseph de Montcalm in the Battle of the Plains of Abraham in 1759.

This is anecdotic and alone like that it is almost as if the article was trying to tell us that maybe the leaders of the SSJB are immature and possibly irrational in the way they behave. This breaks the rule of NPOV by quite a lot and probably is not relevant in the article of the Saint-Jean-Baptiste Society. If it is actually based on something that Mister Rhéaume did at some point in his life, it could very well be included in the Gilles Rhéaume article. Do you have a date and more info on the circumstances in which it occurred? Or the newspaper article which reported it?

The reason I am asking all these questions is that I am presently collecting notes on the SSJB and planning to rewrite the article. I am busy translating them from French to English at the present, but eventually I will restructure this article by adding headings and develop its content.

Regards,

-- Mathieugp 18:49, 15 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Why are you removing the info from Albert Gesner? This is a legit article. - Hephaestos|§ 15:18, 16 Jun 2004 (UTC)

Pelé Image

Thanx for de Pelé image, but some info on its origin would be helpful.

--Abu Badali 22:43, Jun 24, 2004 (UTC)

Jacqueline Bisset

Please provide source and copyright information for Image:JacquelineBisset.jpg, otherwise it may have to be removed for copyright violation. Images on wikipedia should either be fully distributable under the GFDL or at the very least fair use, see our image use policy. Thanks. --Lexor|Talk 22:38, 25 Jun 2004 (UTC)

La/Madame/Mary Bolduc/Travers

I changed the article about La Bolduc so that it again says English Canadians more often call her Madame Bolduc. It seems to me the use of her maiden name is a recent development. The bio at the Site Mary Travers suggests that she was known as Bolduc throughout her career. However, that raises the question of why it's the Site Mary travers. If you can enlighten me about how she came to be known as Mary Travers, I'd appreciate it. And now that I think about it I'm going to go back and revise the article so my point is made in a less contentious way. TronTonian 19:56, 5 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Lance Armstrong

The picture of Lance Armstrong you uploaded needs copyright info. Snowspinner 03:58, Jul 9, 2004 (UTC)

Tillie's Punctured Romance

I've added a bit to the plot section. Read and tell me what you think. Mike H 19:13, Jul 17, 2004 (UTC)

Waldorf Astoria

Hi,

Thanks for adding Image:Waldorf-Astoria.jpg to the Waldorf-Astoria article. Do you know the copyright status of the image?

Acegikmo1 04:35, 25 Jul 2004 (UTC)

Please respond on the image page or this talk page as soon as you can. Thanks. Acegikmo1 16:58, 17 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Image copyrights

Hi, you recently uploaded two pictures (from Sweden, of a cemetery, I believe). Anyway, please indicate in the image description page who took the photos, and what licence they're under (for example, the GFDL or public domain). Thanks, [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 17:53, 2004 Aug 12 (UTC)

Image copyrights 2

Re: Image:DouglasFairbanksSr.jpg, please remember to include source information and licence status on all images you upload. Thanks again, [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 14:44, 2004 Aug 16 (UTC)

Image:MabelNormand.jpg is better, but still doesn't include a source. For example, "Photo taken from (name of website or book). Pre-1923, no copyright. {{PD}}." Thanks, [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 15:29, 2004 Aug 16 (UTC)

Image copyrights

~~Re: Image:JohnBunny.jpg]---PLEASE include source information and copyright status when you upload images. Thank you. [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 16:41, 2004 Aug 17 (UTC)~~

You're right, sorry I overreacted. That was meant to be a friendly reminder. I think the Wikistress is getting to me; I'm going to cut out for a few. Best wishes and keep contributing, [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 16:52, 2004 Aug 17 (UTC)

Valençay SOE Memorial

Were you going to discuss it with me before having a go at me on Village Pump? I had no idea the discussion was even there, and consequently no chance to defend myself! It might have been politer if you had messaged me. - Ta bu shi da yu 05:38, 21 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Rin Tin Tin photo

Hi; could you please fill in the source & license/copyright info for Image:RinTinTin.jpg? I'm guessing it's an old photo so maybe out of copyright, but if you could give your source & confirm that info for sure, that would be helpful. Thanks! Elf | Talk 21:17, 23 Aug 2004 (UTC)

Linda Evans

How fair use is that Linda Evans photo? The one I have, although not the most flattering, is fair use as a screenshot. Mike H 01:45, Sep 3, 2004 (UTC)

Harness horses

Hiya. I started to move the harness horses from the Horse racing category to the Racehorses category, when it occurred to me that they might be better off in some Harness racing horses category - I don't really know harness racing well enough to know if they're known as 'Racehorsces'. Your thoughts? Varitek 05:05, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Info on image, please

Please go to Image:BarbaraAnnScott.jpg and edit that image description page to give the source (URL, if online; ISBN, if scanned from a book; and if you've taken the image yourself, just say so) and the licensing status (the list of image copyright tags might be useful) of this image. All our images should have this information; images without source or license info will be deleted after seven days. Thank you. Lupo 11:46, 24 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Waldorf-Astoria image

Hello,

Could you provide source information and copyright status for Image:Waldorf-Astoria.jpg?

Thanks,

Acegikmo1 21:49, 27 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Brigitte Fossey images

Please indicate these images' source and licensing status. All images on Wikipedia should have this information, so please add it on the image description pages. Thanks, Lupo 15:40, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Oops, sorry. Seems I was too fast :-) Lupo 15:41, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Canadian politicians

Hi...when we're categorizing politicians, we should only use the category "Canadian politicians" for people who don't fit any subcategory (like, say, David Orchard.) For example, there's no need to list John F. Stairs in the categories "Canadian politicians" and "Nova Scotia politicians" and "Members of the Canadian House of Commons" -- both of the other two are already subcategories of "Canadian politicians" anyway. "Canadian politicians" should serve only to link the various subcategories and to collect the relatively few political figures who don't fit any of them. Otherwise, a politician should just be listed in the appropriate subcategories, because by the time we have every Canadian politician who's ever been notable listed in here, "Canadian politicians" is going to be too cluttered and confusing to be useful if we're not careful. Bearcat 01:06, 18 Oct 2004 (UTC)

Terry Mosher

Thanks for the additions to List of Canadian Jews. Just one question: are you sure Terry Mosher is Jewish? I couldn't find anything online... -Udzu 02:19, 6 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Thanks. -Udzu 14:56, 8 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Did you know has been updated

And one of the articles you've recently created is part of the line-up. Enjoy! - [[User:MacGyverMagic|Mgm|^(talk)]] 08:18, Nov 9, 2004 (UTC)

... and again! -- Infrogmation 20:28, 26 Nov 2004 (UTC)

Did you know has been updated

and a fact from the article Luigi Fagioli, which you recently created, has been featured in that section on the Main Page. If you have another interesting fact to submit, then please suggest it at the section's talk page.

Article Licensing

Hi, I've started the Free the Rambot Articles Project which has the goals of getting users to multi-license all of their contributions that they've made to...

...all U.S. state, county, and city articles...
...all articles...

using the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike (CC-by-sa) version 1.0 and 2.0 Licenses or into the public domain if they prefer. The CC-by-sa license is a true free documentation license that is similar to the GFDL (which every contribution made to Wikipedia is licensed under), but it allows other projects, such as WikiTravel, to use our articles (See the Multi-licensing Guide for more information). Since you are among the top 1000 most active Wikipedians, I was wondering if you would be willing to multi-license all of your contributions or at minimum those on the geographic articles.

Nutshell: Wikipedia articles can be shared with any other GFDL project but open/free projects using the incompatible Creative Commons Licenses (e.g. WikiTravel) can't use our stuff and we can't use theirs. It is important to us that other free projects can use our stuff. So we use their licenses too.

To allow us to track those users who muli-license their contributions, many users copy and paste the {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} template (or {{MultiLicensePD}} for public domain) into their user page, but there are other templates for other options at Template messages/User namespace. The following examples could also copied and pasted into your user page:

Option 1

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions, with the exception of my user pages, as described below:

OR

Option 2

I agree to [[Wikipedia:Multi-licensing|multi-license]] all my contributions to any [[U.S. state]], county, or city article as described below:

Or if you wanted to place your work into the public domain, you could replace {{DualLicenseWithCC-BySA-Dual}} with {{MultiLicensePD}}. If you only prefer using the GFDL, I would like to know that too. Please let me know at my talk page what you think. -- Ram-Man 18:02, Nov 30, 2004 (UTC)

Moving pages

I noticed that you moved The Black Dahlia to Elizabeth Short. You did this by copying the text from one article to another. This is bad! It separates the edit history into two pieces and makes it harder to keep track of changes to the article. (Since I'm an administrator, I was able to fix things, so that the edit history is now combined again.) Instead, you should use Special:Movepage, which you can use with the "move" tab that's usually at the top of the web page, just above the article itself. (See meta:Help:Renaming (moving) a page for more information.) Let me know if you have any troule moving pages in the future.

By the way, I also disagreed with your move, so I moved the article back to The Black Dahlia. (I've explained my reasonsn on Talk:The Black Dahlia.) But this is a separate issue from how the page is moved. You may very well be right about what name the page should have, and you may decide to move it back to Elizabeth Short. Just make sure to use Special:Movepage if you do so! ^_^

-- Toby Bartels 06:34, 1 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Image:Ptrudeau.jpg?

Hi! Thanks for uploading Image:Ptrudeau.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the image and I'll tag it for you. Thanks so much, Dbenbenn 20:43, 9 Dec 2004 (UTC)

I noticed that you upload lots of images (which is great!) without indicating their source (not so great). Besides copyright issues, saying where you got an image improves verifiability, and also helps teach others where to find similar images. For example, I'm curious where you get all the great images of early-1900s historical figures, since I'd like to upload similar images about mathematicians. Thanks, --Dbenbenn 00:25, 14 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Unverified images

Hi! Thanks for uploading the following image:

Image:IngemarJhansson.jpg

I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GNU Free Documentation License, {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know at my talk page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk, automation script)]] 04:01, Dec 10, 2004 (UTC)

P.S. You can help tag other images at User:Yann/Untagged_Images. Thanks again.

Unverified images

Hi! Thanks for uploading the following image:

Image:DouglasFairbanksSr.jpg

I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GNU Free Documentation License, {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know at my talk page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk, automation script)]] 04:57, Dec 11, 2004 (UTC)

P.S. You can help tag other images at User:Yann/Untagged_Images. Thanks again.

Please don't move railroad pages

Please don't move railroad pages from Whatever Railroad to Whatever Railroad Company. It breaks the standards of Wikipedia naming in general, WikiProject Trains in particular, and puts the name into a form nobody would ever link to. I will revert such moves. —Morven 21:54, Dec 13, 2004 (UTC)

Image licensing

Hi, I just noticed this edit and changed the tag from PD-art to PD-art-US because Modiliani passed away less than 100 years ago. If that particular work is under public domain worldwide for other reasons than expiration, I have to apologize my lack of awareness. Tomos 13:52, 20 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Unverified images

Hi! Thanks for uploading the following image:

Image:GeneTunney.jpg

I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GNU Free Documentation License, {{PD-self}} if you wish to release your own work to the public domain, {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know at my talk page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much. [[User:Poccil|Peter O. (Talk, automation script)]] 22:23, Dec 20, 2004 (UTC)

P.S. You can help tag other images at User:Yann/Untagged_Images. Thanks again.

Also:

Image:KiriTeKanawa.jpg
Image:ConfederationBridge.jpg RedWolf 00:10, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC)
Image:JFutrelle.JPG RedWolf 16:16, Dec 24, 2004 (UTC)
Image:JackJohnsonboxer.jpg
Image:JackSharkey.jpg
Image:BeatriceLillie.jpg

Unverified images

Hi! Thanks for uploading the following image:

Image:LaBolduc.png

I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GNU Free Documentation License, {{PD-self}} if you wish to release your own work to the public domain, {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know at my talk page where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much. Peter O. (Talk, automation script) 06:40, Dec 25, 2004 (UTC)

P.S. You can help tag other images at User:Yann/Untagged_Images. Thanks again.

ALSO:

Edit summary

Hello. Please provide an edit summary. Thanks and happy edits. Hyacinth 18:47, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)

Untagged images

Thanks for uploading Image:BigBertha.jpg. I notice it currently doesn't have an image copyright tag. Could you add one to let us know its copyright status? (You can use {{gfdl}} if you release it under the GFDL, or {{fairuse}} if you claim fair use, etc.) If you don't know what any of this means, just let me know where you got the images and I'll tag them for you. Thanks so much, AlbinoMonkey 00:31, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Same for Image:MariaBueno.jpg. Thanks, ugen 64 02:33, 11 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Also: Image:RobertBenoist.jpg, Duk 09:26, 20 Jan 2005 (UTC)

Country of birth

Sorry about that. Phrases like "Laval, Quebec, Canada", "Edmonton, Alberta, Canada", always sound wordy and redundant to me. I figured if someone is so ignorant not to know where a province is, he (thanks to the magic of hypertext) can just click on the link to find out. But I'll leave such phrases alone from now on. Indefatigable 22:56, 4 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Question about Image:Robertborden.jpeg

Hi JillandJack,

I left a question for you at WP:IFD on your Image:Robertborden.jpeg entry.

Cheers, dbenbenn | talk 07:05, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Re your Question about Image:Robertborden.jpeg. Many thanks for pointing this out. Neither of us are much good on the computer and it took us a while to figure it out. Funny though, after replacing the old image with the new in the template for the Canadian PM's, they still remain on the image page list. Thanks again. JillandJack 14:03, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Ah. Right. When you replace an image in a template, the old image doesn't know it's been replaced until all the pages that use the template have been edited. I went through the list of prime ministers and did minor edits at all of them.

Might have been easier to just upload the new image over the old image, with the same file name.

By the way, are you aware of the Commons? If you put your images up there, they can be used by all other Wikipedias, for example pl:Robert Borden. dbenbenn | talk 20:54, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

John Redpath

Point taken about the possibility of confusing Canadians. However, the term "London, England" is considered an Americanism and very annoying to lots of people in the UK. Maybe something such as " London, (UK) " would be acceptable to everybody??. Steve. Sc147 22:18, 6 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Bias template

Hi, why did you add the Bias template to Lower Canada Rebellion and Chateau Clique? We can't read your mind so it would be nice to have an explanation on the talk page when you add that. Adam Bishop 15:21, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Alright, the NPOV template is even worse, since it specifically points people to a talk page discussion which does not exist. Why are you adding these templates? Adam Bishop 19:21, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Etat Quebecois VfD

You're welcome. You already did most of the work, though. All I had to do was mark down your name in the VfD. :-) --Death phoenix 22:53, 8 Feb 2005 (UTC)

No...

You don't need to tell me, friends, whether or not I "need" to apologize. I can tell well enough myself, and right now, I do need to apologize to you. I spoke too soon and without knowing the context, and had a bad feeling right afterwards but I had to leave the premises in a hurry for a real life commitment. I've struck it through, replaced with "allegedly", made it clear I wasn't endorsing that representation of what you were doing myself, and I brought myself down a peg for how I put it at first. I am sorry.

About not degrading others making honest efforts, yay! I have to say, though, that I feel a bit uncomfortable reading on your user page that you "are not interested in having those who have been part of this biased input pretend innocence and ask questions. Those people will not be responded to under any circumstances." Now, every Wikipedian is a volunteer and only contributes in whichever way they feel called to, and we can't say anyone here has an obligation to respond to anything else. I'm afraid this makes edit conflicts more personal and adversarial than necessary (or productive in resolving anything). It also misses the point that a POV edit may just have been, to the poster, "conventional wisdom" that they really might not have sat back from and looked at the way you/we/anyone else looks at it.

It really does feel like it's saying "if you made in the past something I thought was a POV edit, you're beyond help, and not worth talking to in the future." Even if Stephen Hawking made this statement about theoretical astrophysics, it would seem a bit high on himself, so it's distressing to read on a consensus-driven, volunteer-written Wiki. The assumption such a poster, whose NPOV-ness you disagree with, wasn't making an "honest effort" to the best of their ability too, in many cases (there are plenty of obvious exceptions, of course), undercuts the wonderful sentiments on your message on my talk page.

To be clear, I don't think you said this to knock people down, just to guard your editing time against cat-and-mouse debates. But there's a big personal sting in how I think people will read it, and see Adam Bishop on the WP:CWNB thinking you were talking about him.

Speaking of personal sting, "No need to apologize, looking at some of your history, I understand what you are?" I guess you either mean an inclusionist voter (on real, remotely encyclopedic subjects) on vfd, a patient consensus-builder who tries to move conflicts ahead with engagement and discussion (see Talk:Belinda Stronach), or that I'm just a bad editor. Trust me, I feel like a piece of shit enough already for having, with a badly chosen word, inadvertently flamed you. If you mean the latter, you can tell me directly. Please do. And I'd say nothing further of it... Samaritan 00:13, 9 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Dysfunctional family and Redpath Sugar

Wow. You're right, that's weird.

The Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion page is only for listing images and sound files and the like. For pages like this, you should list them on Wikipedia:Votes for deletion. (It's a little complicated to list a site there, so if you need help, I'll help you out.)

This looks like a real-live bug, though. I'd suggest you list it on Wikipedia:Village pump (technical), and ask them what should be done with the page. I'll bet someone there will know the best way to take care of the articles.

Best regards, – Quadell ^{(talk) (sleuth)} 17:06, Feb 10, 2005 (UTC)

I looked through Wikipedia:Village pump (technical), and I actually figured out how to fix the probem! I fixed it for both pages, and they should both work now. If you run into any other pages with the same problem, just let me know. – Quadell ^{(talk) (sleuth)} 18:45, Feb 10, 2005 (UTC)

Quebec topics

Just a quick question about your POV tagging of Quebec topics and categories: is there any particular reason why you can't just make the changes you'd like to see? If you want the categories to be merged, is there any reason why you can't just do the merging? Bearcat 03:01, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Follow-up regarding the Quebec politicians category: every province already has its own subcategory for politicians from that province, in order to include members of the provincial legislature. Bearcat 04:03, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

But the "Be Bold" rule applies just as much as the POV tags. I can easily see a distinction between "POV that a user should tag" (ie. "recognizes the bias issue, but doesn't know enough about the subject to fix it personally") and "POV that a user should just go ahead and fix themselves" (ie. "knows the subject".) There's no special onus on anybody to do anything, except that which applies to us all. Bearcat 05:22, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Wikipedia doesn't have a policy against subcategories for particular provinces or states, as long as they're not treated like national categories (ie. it can only be a subcategory of the national one, not an independent subcategory of "politics by country".) Though I am seriously considering replacing the "(PROVINCE) politicians" categories with "Member of the provincial legislature from (province)" ones. Bearcat 05:30, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Seven US states have their own individual "writers" categories; four that I've seen have their own "musicians" categories. The only reason more don't is that nobody's done them, not because there's a policy against them. Every state has its own politicians category; "Canadian politicians" will be completely unusable if we don't chunk them out into subcategories and keep as few articles as possible in the main one. Bearcat 05:50, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)

American/Canadian actors

For example, Marie Dressler and Sidney Olcott was born in Canada (and says canadian in the intro paragraph, by the way) but you changed it to American actors. Exactly what definition of "American actor" and "Canadian actor" are you using? Born in ______ or worked in _____? Either way, you left at least two article as inconsistent and you aren't marking your summaries.

It would appear your definition of "Canadian actor" is not that of the status quo. The parent category of Category:Canadian actors is Category:Actors by nationality, which to me means what their citizenship is or where they were born.

Consider this FYI more than anything. Cburnett 23:00, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Dr. Hugo Heyrman

Hi JillandJack,

I noticed you moved the article for Dr. Hugo Heyrman to Hugo Heyrman. Did you check the talk pages? In general I would agree with the move (infact I moved it myself a couple of times), but the article seems to written by the man himself, who is quite keen to use the identity 'Dr Hugo'.

The initial creation of the article was a bit messy. I did some checking for notability, copyvios and Google tests of 'Dr. Hugo Heyrman' vs 'Hugo Heyrman', so following discussion I decided to let it stand, whilst cleaning up most of the redirects and duplicate articles. -- Solipsist 07:45, 15 Feb 2005 (UTC)

Fixes

No problem! I fixed Hôtel Ritz Paris, and I moved Category:French Dancers to Category:French dancers. You seem to have a real love of French culture. That's wonderful. Best regards, – Quadell ^{(talk) (sleuth)} 13:24, Feb 15, 2005 (UTC)

3RR

You have been blocked for 24 hours for violating the 3 revert rule. If you with to appeal this action please contact another admin or the mailing list by email.Geni 21:19, 17 Feb 2005 (UTC)

FYI, User:Curps has also been blocked for 24 hours for a 3RR. See Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/3RR -- Chris 73 Talk 04:13, Feb 18, 2005 (UTC)

We meet again...

Latest comment: 19 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

So, DW/Joe Canuck/Angelique/whoever else, congratulations...you're pretty good at changing identities, but why don't you just stay relatively well-behaved for once? If you didn't always revert to doing and saying the same things that always get you banned, we would probably never notice when you return.

Elaborate? "You are Angelique." Don't be shy, we know it's you :) Adam Bishop 22:12, 19 Feb 2005 (UTC)

You have been blocked by Adam Bishop (a ban extended by myself) under suspicion of being the banned user DW on account that you have the same password, use an IP from a similar location, and display exactly the same characteristics of DW and other users believed to be DW, particularly "Angelique". Angela . 23:44, Feb 19, 2005 (UTC)

Um. I was just reading the "developer help" page, and I noticed that it says that there is no evidence suggesting a connection here...and this person has been banned for three months and nobody has done anything about that? Am I the only one who thinks that is extraordinarily wrong? Everyking 08:54, 17 May 2005 (UTC)Reply

Abuse in delete attempt for the Radical Lawyers category

I have reverted several changes made by user JillandJack with respect to the radical lawyers category. First of all, I disagree with the proposal to delete the category because the category is not branding those who defend unpopular individuals, but rather those who have been influenced by ideologies outside of the mainstream in their legal careers and proceeded through highly unconventional means. Thus, I see no point-of-view problem and think that all those in the category should be there.

My main problem, however, has to do with the fact that this user has empties most of the category while the deletion request is still pending. The notice of the request explicitly states that the category should not be emptied while the request is still pending. The changes made by this user emptied out but all but one of the listings, which clearly is an attempt to preempt a ruling on the subject. It also seems to be an attempt to manipulate the appearance of the category by making it seem as though it cannot contain a coherent collection of articles.

I find the user's basis for removing articles from the category to be rather ironic given his/her basis for disputing the existence of the category. He/she premises the argument in favor of deletion on the belief that the term "radical" is merely a label of opinion to brand those whom someone dislikes. (This assumes, falsely I believe, that something radical is necessarily negative.) He/she then proceeds to remove articles with the justification that the lawyer in question is not a radical lawyer. If he/she believes that the classification is a matter of opinion, then he/she cannot make a ruling on whether or not someone is radical without inserting his/her perspective as the supposed objective truth. Furthermore, if this user is concerned with objectivity, then he/she should not have replaced "defend the rights of controversial client" in place of defend controversial clients" on the Lynne Stewart article. JillandJack's phraseology is obviously biased because it assumes that the methods of Stewart clearly advance the rights of someone. While that may be the case in someone's opinion, an objective statement would simply recognize that she represents controversial clients.

Thus, the actions of this user are hypocritical in addition to constituting acts of vandalism.

Image:Zoopaxiscope-1879.jpg

Image deletion warning

The image Image:Zoopaxiscope-1879.jpg has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it will be deleted. If you have any information on the source or licensing of this image, please go there to provide the necessary information.

Image source/licensing for Image:BobbyCurtola.jpg

Latest comment: 19 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

The image you uploaded, Image:BobbyCurtola.jpg, has no source information. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, ie in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. Unless the copyright status is provided, the image will be marked for deletion on 24 October 2005.

This message notification has been automatically sent by NotificationBot managed and run by AllyUnion. Please leave comments regarding bot operations at AllyUnion's talk page. Please direct all comments regarding licensing information at Wikipedia talk:Images for deletion. --NotificationBot 13:07, 17 October 2005 (UTC)Reply

Image:Ridicule.gif has been listed for deletion

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:Ridicule.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

*drew 10:52, 17 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Image:GaetanBoucher.jpg has been listed for deletion

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:GaetanBoucher.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Thuresson 13:54, 19 November 2005 (UTC)Reply

Image:GoldwynSamuel.JPG has been listed as a possible copyright violation

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An image that you uploaded, Image:GoldwynSamuel.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Copyright problems because it is a suspected copyright violation. Please look there if you know that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), and then provide the necessary information there and on its page, if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

Htmlguy716 19:16, 11 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

References needed

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, I'd to verify Henri Cornet but have no references. Please could you add the sources you used to write the article? Cheers, Lupin|talk|popups 22:56, 12 December 2005 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:GastonChevroletIndy1920.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:GastonChevroletIndy1920.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sanbec 10:07, 20 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:ZPreisner.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This image may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:ZPreisner.jpg. I notice the image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --OrphanBot 03:26, 23 January 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:AllaNazimova.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:AllaNazimova.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 16:57, 17 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging Image:CarlBenz.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This media may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:CarlBenz.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created this media yourself then you need to argue that we have the right to use the media on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the media yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the media also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then you can use {{GFDL-self}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media qualifies as fair use, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other media, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Nv8200p talk 20:12, 20 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging for Image:ArletteDorgere.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading Image:ArletteDorgere.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 13:39, 22 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging for Image:ArnaudMassy.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading Image:ArnaudMassy.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 05:46, 25 February 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging for Image:BessieColeman.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading Image:BessieColeman.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 04:37, 1 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging for Image:ConstanceBennett.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading Image:ConstanceBennett.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 03:00, 4 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging for Image:DitClapper.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading Image:DitClapper.jpg. The image page currently doesn't specify who created the image, so the copyright status is therefore unclear. If you have not created the image yourself then you need to indicate why we have the right to use the image on Wikipedia (see copyright tagging below). If you have not created the image yourself then you should also specify where you found it, i.e., in most cases link to the website where you got it, and the terms of use for content from that page.

If the image also doesn't have a copyright tag then you must also add one. If you created/took the picture then you can use {{GFDL}} to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the image qualifies under Wikipedia's fair use guidelines, please read fair use, and then use a tag such as {{Non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair_use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use. If you want the image to be deleted, tag it as {{db-unksource}}.

If you have uploaded other images, please check that you have specified their source and copyright tagged them, too. You can find a list of image pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any unsourced and untagged images will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have any concerns, contact the bot's owner: Carnildo. 02:12, 7 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging for Image:DuplessisOrphans.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading Image:DuplessisOrphans.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 05:10, 9 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging for Image:EShort-BlackDahlia.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading Image:EShort-BlackDahlia.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 03:50, 11 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:LuigiVilloresi2.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:LuigiVilloresi2.jpg. However, the image may soon be deleted unless we can determine the copyright holder and copyright status. The Wikimedia Foundation is very careful about the images included in Wikipedia because of copyright law (see Wikipedia's Copyright policy).

The copyright holder is usually the creator, the creator's employer, or the last person who was transferred ownership rights. Copyright information on images is signified using copyright templates. The three basic license types on Wikipedia are open content, public domain, and fair use. Find the appropriate template in Wikipedia:Image copyright tags and place it on the image page like this: {{TemplateName}}.

Please signify the copyright information on any other images you have uploaded or will upload. Remember that images without this important information can be deleted by an administrator.

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you have questions about copyright tagging of images, post on Wikipedia talk:Image copyright tags or User talk:Carnildo/images. 13:34, 12 March 2006 (UTC)

Image Tagging for Image:Ferenc_Szisz1.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading Image:Ferenc_Szisz1.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 05:51, 13 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging for Image:Ferenc_Szisz1906GP.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading Image:Ferenc_Szisz1906GP.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 08:36, 13 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging for Image:GeorgeWVanderbiltII.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading Image:GeorgeWVanderbiltII.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 19:42, 16 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging for Image:AGuillaumeArmour.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading Image:AGuillaumeArmour.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 11:00, 18 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging for Image:Polaire.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading Image:Polaire.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 10:49, 20 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging for Image:SergeiYesenin.JPG

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading Image:SergeiYesenin.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see User talk:Carnildo/images. 09:54, 22 March 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image:GracelandCemeteryChicago.jpg listed for deletion

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An image or media file that you uploaded, Image:GracelandCemeteryChicago.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you.

JeremyA 02:14, 12 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging for Image:VeraKorene.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading Image:VeraKorene.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 11:57, 24 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging for Image:WBackhouseAstorSr.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading Image:WBackhouseAstorSr.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:01, 26 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging for Image:WWaldorfAstorII.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading Image:WWaldorfAstorII.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:11, 30 April 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging for Image:WilfredLucas.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading Image:WilfredLucas.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 14:56, 2 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging for Image:YvetteGuilbert.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading Image:YvetteGuilbert.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 15:23, 4 May 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image Tagging for Image:NickAufderMaur.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:NickAufderMaur.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:41, 6 May 2006 (UTC)

Karen Morley Image

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi,

Would you assist me with placing an image of Karen Morley which I have uploaded to Wikipedia. I believe that it is a fair use magazine scan and it is the first image I have contributed. It is from a 1933 Movie Classic film magazine. I do a lot of editing, especially of the insertions concerning old film stars. Best, Sincerely, Robert--Robert 23:49, 28 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:EzzardCharles.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading Image:EzzardCharles.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:16, 9 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:GiuseppeFarinaRacing.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading Image:GiuseppeFarinaRacing.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:09, 18 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:PauletteGoddard.jpg)

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

This file may be deleted.

Thanks for uploading Image:PauletteGoddard.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image can be used under a fair use license. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful.

If you have uploaded other fair use media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Rossrs 07:46, 20 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:HermannLang.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading Image:HermannLang.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 09:07, 20 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image:Keelerbookcover.jpg listed for deletion

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Keelerbookcover.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please look there to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Wikipeder 18:37, 19 September 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image copyright problem with Image:BalladofaSoldier2.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading Image:BalladofaSoldier2.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:05, 15 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Possibly unfree Image:MarcGagnon.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:MarcGagnon.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sherool (talk) 08:58, 24 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

--Sherool (talk) 08:58, 24 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for Image:WGrover-Williams.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading Image:WGrover-Williams.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 10:58, 24 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for Image:DavidBret.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading Image:DavidBret.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:50, 26 October 2006 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned fair use image (Image:PrettyWoman.jpg)

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading Image:PrettyWoman.jpg. I notice the 'image' page currently specifies that the image is unlicensed for use on Wikipedia and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable under fair use (see our fair use policy).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any fair use images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Quentin X 13:14, 1 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for Image:BaconinBorzacchini.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading Image:BaconinBorzacchini.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:05, 2 November 2006 (UTC)Reply

Image tagging for Image:BerndRosemeyer.jpg

Latest comment: 18 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Thanks for uploading Image:BerndRosemeyer.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:41, 4 November 2006 (UTC)Reply