Sockpuppetry case edit

 

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Asifleghari for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Darkness Shines (talk) 11:03, 4 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

April 2012 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Asif's Electric Charge Energy Equivalence, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Darkness Shines (talk) 11:09, 4 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jhon tocci (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

please kindly unblock my account, i promise you that i will not do any violation again. I agree that I'm using multiple accounts, but I'm realy sorry now and I will not use any more account. Please kindly unblock my account and now i will follow wikipedia rules and guidance. Thank you

Decline reason:

Please request unblock from your original account, as explained below. --jpgordon::==( o ) 14:36, 4 April 2012 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

  • Comment by blocking admin: sockmaster is Princeneil (talk), see SPI, and I have told this sock on my talk page that any unblock request should made from that account. See also the item below on my talk page, from which it appears that he cannot understand that his theories are original research. JohnCD (talk) 14:18, 4 April 2012 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jhon tocci (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

dear JhonCD, I request you that please kindly unblock my account. I'm sorry whatever I have done. Now I will follow wikipedia rules. I agree that I'm using multiple account, but I promise you that now I will not do these things. And kindly unblock my current account. And I want to request you that recently you have deleted my page. The name of my page is Asif's Electromagneta Effect. This page does not contain any copy pasted material or original research. I request you that please upload my same page on wikipedia so that I can improve it with suitabe sources. Please kindly help me and upload my page. I'm waiting for this. I will be your thankful if you apload my page that you have recently deleted. My page name is Asif's Electromagneta Effect. Now I will surely follow wikipedia rules. Please trust me I will not do any violation again and please apload my recently deleted page. I'm waiting. Jhon tocci (talk) 15:56, 4 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Absolutely not. Apply from your primary account.--Anthony Bradbury"talk" 17:54, 4 April 2012 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Because I blocked you, I will leave your request for another administrator to review, but please read this carefully:

Either you do not read what I keep telling you, or you do not understand it. This is the last time I will repeat it. If you keep making the same request, your access to this talk page may be blocked.

If you do not understand, please ask someone who understands English to explain this to you:

  • This sockpuppet account will not be unblocked. You must request unblock on the talk page of your first account, Princeneil (talk · contribs). Before you do that, you should read the WP:Guide to appealing a block. Your request will need to convince the reviewing administrator that you understand why you were blocked, and that if unblocked you will not repeat that conduct.
  • You were blocked for persistently trying to use Wikipedia to publish your own original theories. There are other places you can do that; it is not what Wikipedia is for. If that is all you want to do here, you will not be unblocked.
  • The page you ask for will not be restored. It is called "Asif's Electromagneta Effect", and it says "The electromagneta effect was first introduced by Theorical physists Mr.Asif ali leghari." So it is your theory, and that makes it original research. If you do not understand Wikipedia:No original research, ask someone to explain it to you. Perhaps the Arabic version will help.

JohnCD (talk) 17:18, 4 April 2012 (UTC)Reply