Beyond Time edit

 

A tag has been placed on Beyond Time, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please add {{hangon}} on the top of the article and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Bagheera (talk) 21:48, 18 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image copyright problem with Image:Issue 1.JPG edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Issue 1.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 22:30, 18 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


copy of message from my talk page with response edit

Deleting Beyond Time

Hi,

I don't think I did the company justice in the area that asks for a summary of the article. It's strictly informational about the company that owns the comic book property Black Tiger, not an advertisement. I would appreciate you reconsidering deleting this article.

Thanks,

John —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jhervey (talkcontribs) 22:33, 18 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Are you the owner of the company as you stated in your edit summary? If this is your company, I strongly recommend that you read the Wikipedia guideline about conflict of interest. Besides that hurdle, you need to be able to show that the company Beyond Time is notable. Please read the sections of wikipedia about verifiability and reliable sources which both help you show how your company is notable, and then get back to me with links to those. If you need help with this, you can ask me, any other user, or use the help desk. If you feel after reading those links that the article should still be here, let me know and I will restore the article (probably in your userspace and not the mainspace unless you have new references). Thanks, looking forward to hearing back from you, happy reading... Keeper | 76 22:39, 18 January 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image:Issue 1.jpg edit

With regards to that image, you need to release it under a free license. Asenine (talk)(contribs) 19:44, 22 January 2008 (UTC)Reply


sorry for the delay edit

Jhervey, sorry for the delay on your request. Please note that the "Beyond Time" article that was deleted is now found by clicking User:Jhervey/Beyond Time. Feel free to edit that page until you feel that it is up to Wikipedia standards; I will then move it back into the mainspace under the title "Beyond Time". If no changes are made to the article, or if the article continues to be advertising without reliable independent sources, it will likely be deleted again. I'll check back with you in 5 days to see your progress; if you have any questions in the meantime, don't hesitate to contact me or any other editor! Thanks, Keeper | 76 20:47, 22 January 2008 (UTC)Reply