This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jharris10 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello i am jonathan Harris, I tried to sign into my new computer, For wikipedia And it says there is a block affecting my IP, i am requesting for it to be taken down so i can complete my paid job for wikipedia, if you read my user page you'll know my full job and everything about me as well. Thank You! Jharris10 (talk) 22:04, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. Now directly blocked. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 22:39, 6 October 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jharris10 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

So i ready the previous block, And was stated that i am a verifed abuser of multiple accounts,??? which i haven't this is my First Time Actually creating account, I have never abused or even created multiple accounts, I am a innocent user, I don't know what has happened previously with wikipedia for this to be stated but i have not and will never abuse any online sources, I am still requesting for this IP Effect to be removed Jharris10 (talk) 00:36, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

 Confirmed sockpuppetry. We haven't the slightest interest in you completing your paid task. We will keep blocking this IP address and any additional accounts you create. Yamla (talk) 10:49, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jharris10 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hi this is jonathan harris, And i am the socket puppetted account as well as the tracy harris account and jmaxwell10, i apologize for any disturbance i have caused to wikipedia, also i was unable to request it on the Jmaxwell10 account because the talk page was blocked, But i am truly sorry and understand the seriousness of this situation, I ask with as much as faith as possible if you could please unblock the IP Ranges, i will not commit any actions of socketpuppetry again. And ask for your trust as well. and the oppurtunity to be able to create and not vandalize, and i truly promise to never every commit any actions of this again i do accept and any consequences to help gain your trust. My apologies for the disturbances and i hope i can start over again, So i am asking for another chance. And I also want to apologize to Yamla and the other administrators I would like to have the ability to create and edit but only under the rules set by wikipedia all the socketpuppet accounts are msears870, jmaxwell10, wikigod8, wikibrown8, kennethmank12 these are all the accounts i remember, this account jharris10 will be my main account of use only.Jharris10 (talk) 16:55, 16 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

The standard offer is your potential path to an unblock. Socking is a major concern, but your WP:PAID editing will also need to be addressed for any potential unblock, preferably after the 6-month standard offer period has elapsed.Jezebel's Ponyobons mots 20:10, 5 November 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jharris10 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello, this is jonathan harris, the socketpuppet User of all the accounts under the jmaxwell10[investigation], I would first like to start off by saying I'm sorry, when i first used wikipedia, I enjoyed writing and creating, but i shouldn't have forced my hand which was entirely disrespectful to the entire wikipedia community and I am truly sorry, I also want to clear up that in one of the accounts I believe it was the jharris account i stated I worked with companies that was false, as well as getting paid to create articles was false, I said those things to deem myself credible on wikipedia and I truly apologize for it, I want to apologize for the damage I caused to wikipedia, I just want another oppurtunity to create and write but only doing so respectfully by following the rules set by wikipedia and its community I want to Also thank the administrators for reading and looking into my case I am deeply sorry for the trouble i have caused you and vow to you and all of wikipedia to never do it again.Jharris10 (talk) 19:17, 7 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jharris10 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello, this is jonathan harris, the socketpuppet User of all the accounts under the jmaxwell10[investigation], I would first like to start off by saying I'm sorry, when i first used wikipedia, I enjoyed writing and creating, but i shouldn't have forced my hand which was entirely disrespectful to the entire wikipedia community and I am truly sorry, I also want to clear up that in one of the accounts I believe it was the jharris account i stated I worked with companies that was false, as well as getting paid to create articles was false, I said those things to deem myself credible on wikipedia and I truly apologize for it, I want to apologize for the damage I caused to wikipedia, I just want another oppurtunity to create and write but only doing so respectfully by following the rules set by wikipedia and its community I want to Also thank the administrators for reading and looking into my case I am deeply sorry for the trouble i have caused you and vow to you and all of wikipedia to never do it again. I also anwserd the question for Daniel Case, my earliest account is kennethmank13 thats the 1st one but all the accounts in the Jmaxwell10 Investigation All the accounts were created by me i would like one hopefully if this block request is approved, This will be my main account Jharris10 And I will definitly not create anymore accounts as well.Jharris10 (talk) 20:24, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Since talk page access has been revoked, there's no point leaving this request open. — Daniel Case (talk) 23:21, 26 November 2021 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.


I see that you are doing some of the things we'd ask you to, like disclosing at least some of your sock accounts. But we would like you to disclose all of them. If there are any you created but never used, any we never turned up via checkuser, cough 'em up. And tell us what you seem to be implying ... that you will use only this account in the future, or if you'd prefer to use another one instead, tell us which one. Daniel Case (talk) 18:05, 19 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

OK Thank You, i have listed the accounts in the block review Jharris10 (talk)

OK, thanks. I'll let a checkuser confirm that. Daniel Case (talk) 17:52, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Reply
This is not the original account. This one was created October 5; others, including the first ones to be blocked, were created in May if not earlier. See Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Jmaxwell10/Archive. Basically, this account is just a block evading sock and should be treated as such. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇 19:13, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

If you could provide me the first account that was blocked I can go to that one, because I don't remember.Jharris10 (talk) 19:16, 31 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Jmaxwell10 is the oldest account which you admit to being so you clearly DO remember the oldest account so stop lying. Lavalizard101 (talk) 20:19, 5 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

So The Earliest account would be the kennethmank13 account which would be the earliest one (i looked in the maxwell investigation page to find it but thats the earliest oneJharris10 (talk) 20:24, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

No Jmaxwell10 (AKA THE MASTER that the SPI is named after) is the oldest account. Lavalizard101 (talk) 23:23, 9 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Oh wait i never created that account, the only accounts i created Are listed in the jmaxwell10 Investigation that account you named was definitly not created by meJharris10 (talk) 14:43, 10 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Further up this very page you admit to being Jmaxwell10. So stop lying. Lavalizard101 (talk) 15:01, 10 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Listen, let me make something clear. If I created the account I would've been said something to complete my honesty to wikipedia, I know all accounts I created and the only ones I created are in the jmaxwell10 investigation, those were the only ones. And as I said if I did created it I would've been said something to 1 get this situation cleared. and to restore my name and trust to wikipedia. So No I did not create the account.Jharris10 (talk) 05:06, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

"i was unable to request it on the Jmaxwell10 account because the talk page was blocked" aka you are Jmaxwell10. Note that the talk page of that account is not blocked at all so that is a lie. Lavalizard101 (talk) 11:38, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Listen, Let's take it back again. When i tried to request for unblock Daniel case the administrator blocked the page, So after that i requested in the UTRS 2 system to have it unblocked and that was declined, (and i just signed into jmaxwell10 account) and the account is currently blocked i can't edit the talk page because of the IP range blocks so i still can't edit the talk page on that account, (so that wasn't a lie) the IP Ranges are blocked so i can't edit those pages when i try to. (and once again if i could have, and the IP range blocks weren't there i could have edit the page but i can't because it is there)This is what it says when i tried to edit the talk page on the account (just now) "There are multiple blocks against your account and/or IP address". So i am not lying.Jharris10 (talk) 15:33, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

So you do own the Jmaxwell10 account (you've admitted you just signed into it), yet you've said you weren't jmaxwell10 in the above: "I never created that account", that's the lie I'm on about. Lavalizard101 (talk) 15:49, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
Given this users flagrant dishonesty, I suggest the next admin revoke TPA. Lavalizard101 (talk) 15:50, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply
Also note that daniel case did not block access to the Jmaxewll10's talk page he blocked the talk page of the sock account aka another mistruth. Lavalizard101 (talk) 15:55, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

You aren't listening to what I'm saying at all, all the ip Ranges are blocked when i tried to access the talk page and edit it, it want let me because the ip address of this device for the account are blocked and is set no expiry the only talk page I have access to edit is this account , because If I were able to request it there i would've done so. Jharris10 (talk) 22:18, 11 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Stop hand
Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an administrator has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.
Please note that there could be appeals to the unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.