Although some prefer welcoming newcomers with cookies, I find fruit to be a healthier alternative.

Hello, Jesuspaul502, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like this place and decide to stay.



Why can't I edit some particular pages?
Some pages that have been vandalized repeatedly are semi-protected, meaning that editing by new or unregistered users is prohibited through technical measures. If you have an account that is four days old and has made at least 10 edits, then you can bypass semi-protection and edit any semi-protected page. Some pages, such as highly visible templates, are fully-protected, meaning that only administrators can edit them. If this is not the case, you may have been blocked or your IP address caught up in a range block.
Where can I experiment with editing Wikipedia?
How do I create an article?
See how to create your first article, then use the Article Wizard to create one, and add references to the article as explained below.
How do I create citations?
  1. Do a search on Google or your preferred search engine for the subject of the Wikipedia article that you want to create a citation for.
  2. Find a website that supports the claim you are trying to find a citation for.
  3. In a new tab/window, go to the citation generator, click on the 'An arbitrary website' bubble, and fill out as many fields as you can about the website you just found.
  4. Click the 'Get reference wiki text' button.
  5. Highlight, and then copy (Ctrl+C or Apple+C), the resulting text (it will be something like <ref> {{cite web | .... }}</ref>, copy the whole thing).
  6. In the Wikipedia article, after the claim you found a citation for, paste (Ctrl+V or Apple+V) the text you copied.
  7. If the article does not have a References or Notes section (or the like), add this to the bottom of the page, but above the External Links section and the categories:
==References==
{{Reflist}}
What is a WikiProject, and how do I join one?
A WikiProject is a group of editors that are interested in improving the coverage of certain topics on Wikipedia. (See this page for a complete list of WikiProjects.) If you would like to help, add your username to the list that is on the bottom of the WikiProject page.

August 2024

edit

  Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Bajaj Consumer Care. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. S0091 (talk) 16:03, 14 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

I categorically refute the unfounded accusation that my contributions were promotional. Every detail I added was meticulously sourced from Moneycontrol, a highly reputable and authoritative source. Rather than taking the easy route of reverting the entire edit, a more diligent and professional approach would have been to refine any elements that may have appeared promotional. Your blanket reversion was not only unprofessional but also a blatant disregard for the standards of scholarly rigor and collaborative integrity. My contributions were drawn exclusively from Moneycontrol's Company History section, and your handling of this matter reflects a significant lapse in judgment and editorial responsibility. JESUS (talk) 05:34, 15 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
First Moneycontrol is a profile written by the company so no not an independent source and statements like "The company has a rich history and a well-established brand presence in the Indian market.", "Bajaj Consumer Care Limited offers a diverse portfolio of well-established brands in the personal care and consumer goods sector. These brands have been integral to the company's market presence and consumer appeal.", "These brands represent Bajaj Consumer Care’s commitment to delivering high-quality products that meet the diverse needs of its consumers. Through continuous innovation and adherence to quality standards, the company has solidified its position as a trusted name in personal care." are wholly promotional and do not belong in an encyclopedia. I also suggest to stop using ChatGPT. S0091 (talk) 14:44, 15 August 2024 (UTC)Reply
Your baseless rejection of Moneycontrol as a legitimate source is not only intellectually lazy but exposes a shocking ignorance of one of the most respected financial references in the industry. The content I provided was rooted in fact, accurately detailing the company's history and market position—something you evidently failed to grasp in your superficial assessment.Your approach to editing, which consists of cherry-picking phrases without any regard for context or factual basis, is a disgrace to the principles of scholarly work. Labeling accurate and well-documented information as 'promotional' is nothing short of a pathetic attempt to mask your own inadequacies as an editor. The language I used was entirely appropriate for an encyclopedia, reflecting the reality of the company’s standing, not some imagined promotional agenda that exists only in your mind.Your irrelevant and condescending suggestion to stop using ChatGPT is a transparent attempt to divert attention from your own failure to engage with the content in any meaningful way. The real issue here is your glaring inability to differentiate between factual reporting and promotion, and if this is the quality of editorial oversight you provide, it’s an embarrassment to the platform. Perhaps it is you who should reconsider your role, as your contributions are clearly more damaging than constructive." JESUS (talk) 04:52, 16 August 2024 (UTC)Reply

Start a discussion with Jesuspaul502

Start a discussion