Jessica76cap

Welcome!

Hello, Jessica76cap, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions.

I noticed that one of the first articles you edited was SeventySix Capital, which appears to be dealing with a topic with which you may have a conflict of interest. In other words, you may find it difficult to write about that topic in a neutral and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or another editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately be blocked from editing. Wikipedia generally does not allow editors to have usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The plain and simple conflict of interest guide
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
• Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! MereTechnicality ⚙ 21:40, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of SeventySix Capital

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on SeventySix Capital, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Blythwood (talk) 21:42, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Wayne Kimmel

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Wayne Kimmel, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Exemplo347 (talk) 21:43, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia. While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not intended to be a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. Exemplo347 (talk) 21:44, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Copyright problem: SeventySix Capital

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as SeventySix Capital, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images from either web sites or printed works. This article appears to contain work copied from http://www.seventysixcapital.com/brian-selander-joins-seventysix-cap, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.

If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:

• If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:SeventySix Capital and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, SeventySix Capital, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
• If you hold the copyright to the work: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:SeventySix Capital. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
• If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the work is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:SeventySix Capital with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.

It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:SeventySix Capital saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.

Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Blythwood (talk) 21:52, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Sockpuppet?

– Athaenara ✉ 23:43, 21 February 2017 (UTC)

Jessica76cap, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Jessica76cap! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Osarius (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

February 2017

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or self-promoting in violation of the conflict of interest and notability guidelines. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 16:17, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jessica76cap (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I made the requested revisions and then was blocked. Please explain what I can do to fix this and publish a factual article. Jessica76cap (talk) 16:19, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Clear violations of WP:PROMO and WP:COI, probable violations of WP:SOCK and WP:PAID. Yamla (talk) 16:26, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jessica76cap (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Responding to Decline reason: Clear violations of WP:PROMO [All of the content I wrote is factual and not opinion whatsoever. I cited sources and spoke without any use of colorful language.] and WP:COI [How do you avoid COI while writing about something you're knowledgeable about?], probable violations of WP:SOCK [This is incorrect. I am new to Wikipedia and this is a new account, not sock puppetry..] and WP:PAID [I am NOT being paid to contribute to Wikipedia]

Decline reason:

Procedural decline. Please only post one unblock request at a time. Optimist on the run (talk) 16:57, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Let's see. The article was very promotional (before copyediting). You clearly have a COI, 76CAP is in your name. No comment on sockpuppetry or paid editing. MereTechnicality ⚙ 16:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

Responding to Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Jessica76cap (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

"Let's see. The article was very promotional (before copyediting). You clearly have a COI, 76CAP is in your name. No comment on sockpuppetry or paid editing. MereTechnicality ⚙ 16:35, 22 February 2017 (UTC)" The article was fact - non-promotional. If a business was sold, it was sold, and I provided proof. Nothing stated could not be backed up by evidence. If COI is representing the firm, do I have to hire someone who doesn't know us to research us and write about the firm? Wouldn't that then be PAID and also a COI? Can anyone just tell me what exactly in the text was considered "PROMO"? I will remove everything you find objectionable, I just want to post the facts here. None of this is easy to navigate.

Decline reason:

Since you have declared that you intend to carry on editing the articles that got you blocked in the first place, and have shown no evidence that you have understood WP:COI, I am firmly of the opinion that it is not in Wikipedia's interest to unblock you. Optimist on the run (talk) 17:49, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If you were to be unblocked, what articles do you intend to edit or create? Optimist on the run (talk) 17:02, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

I am hoping to create new pages for SeventySix Capital, Wayne Kimmel, and eventually Jon Powell. User:Jessica76cap

• Just as a comment, those pages have now been locked so articles on those titles cannot be created except by trusted contributors. Please don't bother to waste your money hiring anyone to try re-creating them. Blythwood (talk) 18:03, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

You also can comment here without submitting a new unblock request. Just hit "Edit" near the top left. MereTechnicality ⚙ 18:11, 22 February 2017 (UTC)

This has been incredibly unclear.. can anyone help by telling me what specifically in the articles are not objective fact? How can I get them published since they are now locked?

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is SeventySix Capital WP campaign. Thank you. - Bri (talk) 19:10, 16 March 2017 (UTC)