Speedy deletion of Webkinz pets edit

 

A tag has been placed on Webkinz pets requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, "See also" section, book reference, category tag, template tag, interwiki link, rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redfarmer (talk) 01:38, 9 February 2008 (UTC)Reply


Image copyright problem with Image:41aiEe87wPL. SL210 -1-.jpg edit

 
Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:41aiEe87wPL. SL210 -1-.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 23:18, 14 February 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of Fred (webshow) edit

 

A tag has been placed on Fred (webshow) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for web content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. TNX-Man 21:47, 30 June 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Fred (webshow) edit

 

An article that you have been involved in editing, Fred (webshow), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Fred (webshow). Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 06:20, 1 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Image without license edit

Unspecified source/license for Image:Dave William Pic.jpg.jpg edit

 

Thanks for uploading Image:Dave William Pic.jpg.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 23:21, 3 November 2008 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Powerthrist edit

 

A tag has been placed on Powerthrist requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content. You may wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. Eeekster (talk) 01:32, 4 November 2009 (UTC)Reply

Reese and Bianca's marriage edit

I undid this edit by you, because the show has thus far led us (its audience) to believe that their marriage was annulled. After initially refusing Bianca's wishes once Bianca finds out that Reese was unfaithful to her by kissing Zach the night before their wedding, Reese later states that she gave Bianca what she wanted. That implies space (as in time) and the annulment. Remember that Reese said she was going to give Bianca everything she wanted in order to be forgiven by Bianca and be a part of Bianca's life again. Flyer22 (talk) 21:37, 4 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

December 2009 edit

  Please do not delete content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Scrubs (TV series), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. Jac16888Talk 15:01, 11 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add content (particularly if you change facts and figures), as you have to the article Controversies surrounding Call of Duty: Modern Warfare 2, please cite a reliable source for the content you're adding or changing. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. Take a look at Wikipedia:Citing sources for information about how to cite sources and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. ThejadefalconSing your songThe bird's seeds 21:29, 20 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

January 2010 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Jacqueline Kennedy Onassis, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and read the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. Thank you.--Dr.K. λogosπraxis 04:13, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Rose (Two and a Half Men) ‎. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you.--Dr.K. λogosπraxis 04:18, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Charlie Harper (Two and a Half Men), you will be blocked from editing. --Dr.K. λogosπraxis 04:18, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

  This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits, such as those you made to Arthur's Knights. If you vandalize Wikipedia again, you will be blocked from editing. --Dr.K. λogosπraxis 04:18, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

I just wanted to say I am sorry for the mistakes I made, please dont refrain me from editing, I will stop my violation mistakes henceforth.

No problem. Please be more careful in the future. Goodbye for now. Dr.K. λogosπraxis 15:21, 5 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jon Shafer edit

 

The article Jon Shafer has been proposed for deletion because under Wikipedia policy, all biographies of living persons created after March 18, 2010, must have at least one source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't take offense. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners or ask at Wikipedia:Help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Chris (talk) 17:56, 5 August 2010 (UTC)Reply

April 2011 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute to the encyclopedia, but when you add or change content, as you did to the article East Timor, please cite a reliable source for the content of your edit. This helps maintain our policy of verifiability. See Wikipedia:Citing sources for how to cite sources, and the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Merbabu (talk) 02:34, 16 April 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Cut cap and balance act edit

 

The article Cut cap and balance act has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evidence. No context - which country?

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 09:14, 20 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Last Warning edit

You've been warned in the past about vandalism. If you keep it up you will be reported to administrators, and your account will likely be blocked permanently.--William S. Saturn (talk) 06:36, 13 July 2012 (UTC)Reply