JasarDaConqueror (talk) 13:27, 10 April 2010 (UTC) Hi, I split the Tna roster page into haevyweights and x-division. just askin but why was the roster split not nessecary. I thought it was better and more helpful to people reading. Its was more helpful to me. This is off the subject but do you have authority like an administrator or something. If I want to make and edit or something I can ask you so I don't waste time making an edit just to get it reverted.Reply

JasarDaConqueror (talk) 14:14, 10 April 2010 (UTC) Yeah that makes sense. I was going to make a page called List of WWE Title Matches. I was planning on doing a page for each title. Basically it was the title says. For example Ken Anderson has never been a world champion but has been in many world title matches. I'v google it and I can't actually find a list of championship matches so I thought i'd make my own. I just wanted to ask, do you think it would be deleted or merged with the list of chamions. Because I don't wanna go through all the trouble then have it deleted.Reply

JasarDaConqueror (talk) 15:44, 10 April 2010 (UTC) I'm up for making it. Do you know who has authority like an admin. I could take it up with him/her. Maybe I could have the name of the wwe champions page changed to List of WWE Champions and Defences. Then I could add all the defenses to the page instead of making another one.Reply

FCW Florida Tag Team Championship

edit

I readded the links you removed on the Uso Brothers - per. WP:RED, Wikipedia's guideline on Redlinks the following applies "In general, a red link should be allowed to remain in an article if it links to a term that could plausibly sustain an article, but for which there exists no candidate article, or article section, under any name." - in other words if there is the potential for an article on the Uso Brothers (they're on Raw so of course there is) then it should be linked even if it's red. So please don't remove the redlinks again, thanks.  MPJ -DK  10:10, 6 June 2010 (UTC)Reply

WWE Roster article

edit

The removal of citation templates from articles is a form of vandalism. For now, I believe it was all in goof faith; I have rollbacked your edits, don't do it again. Feedback 09:58, 8 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Hardcore Justice Page

edit

Why can't the page just be Hardcore Justice why do you have to add the year when it is only a 1 time event next year it will go back to Hard Justice so if this is a 1 time event it is not needed to add a year yet you say it should be moved back to the page to the year Totalaero (talk) 20:02, 2 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Turning Point (2010)

edit

input needed

edit

input needed here Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Survivor Series (2010).--Steam Iron 15:54, 3 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Bragging Rights (2010)

edit

In MOS:TEXT it states "Editors should avoid manually inserting large and small fonts into prose. Increased and decreased font size should primarily be produced through automated facilities such as headings or through carefully designed templates." Afro (Talk) 23:28, 23 October 2010 (UTC)Reply

Final Resolution (2010)

edit

Poster iN DEMAND. 201.89.184.107 (talk) 04:12, 1 November 2010 (UTC)Reply

thanks

edit

thanks for the help on Mike Dalton --Nakurio (talk) 10:45, 28 March 2012 (UTC)Reply

Extreme Rules (2012)

edit

The full-protection is there to prevent an revert war from breaking out. Deryck C. 17:08, 7 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

in re this edit summary

edit

Show me a MOS guideline that demands this, show me precident for this, in this form it makes no sense. "Stipulation TBA match?" that's not the match type. it should read "Intercontinental Championship match, match stipulation TBA" cause that's what's happening. In short, it needs to make sense, in the form you keep reverting to it doesn't and is liable to confuse readers. CRRaysHead90 | Get Some! 04:58, 29 April 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sandow elbow

edit

Jeffhardyred, I understand the effort you've put in to check the google translate for Sandow's elbow. If you do listen to what Cole's called it -> youtube v=B2U6RWFqZg8 after 3:20 -> Cole clearly says "disdain" there. And if you check various reliable sources, they all apparently heard "disdain" as well. See PWTorch and Wrestleview. I think the problem here is that WWE themselves have made an error on the Latin translation for disdain. Elbow of disdain makes much more sense than distain. Distain -> "To tinge with a different color from the natural or proper one; to stain; to discolor" Perhaps when translating the English to the Latin, WWE screwed up and made a typo on disdain. Therefore the move should be called disdain, not distain. Starship.paint (talk) 09:31, 1 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

Summerslam 2012

edit

Don't flim-flam please. Reading the policy you know that while the source needn't be reliable it requires a reputation for attracting readers with reviews, which a two month old site with four articles and little following does not meet. Thanks. Papacha (talk) 20:09, 27 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

Just 'cuz. Papacha (talk) 01:30, 28 September 2012 (UTC)Reply
Thank you though, for the follow through. Honestly I prolly should have pursued further steps other than initiating slash & burn, and I've been short of late besides. So thanks. Papacha (talk) 01:30, 28 September 2012 (UTC)Reply

"Ring names" for regular people.

edit

I explained myself at Talk:List of WWE personnel. If you haven't addressed these concerns by tomorrow (or sooner, if you agree), this unnecessary duplication has to go. We can work on making the blanks look better, but we can't fill them just for the sake of having something. InedibleHulk (talk) 23:57, 3 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

I'm not understanding your "Sean Waltman doesn't use this ring name anymore" logic. This list is full of guys who haven't wrestled or been on TV for years. So they don't use their ring names anymore, either, but we list them because that's what they're best known as. "X-Pac" was on Raw 1000 just a few months ago. How is Waltman any different than Pfohl, Lunde, Gruner or Lauer? Would you rather we called him "The 1-2-3 Kid"? InedibleHulk (talk) 22:49, 7 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

WP:ANEW

edit

Hey there, just to let you know that I've started a discussion regarding Batista1's edit warring on various articles, including Hell in a Cell, at WP:ANEW. I've mentioned you very briefly as someone who, like me, has been trying to maintain consensus. I feel that your comments on the page would be really appreciated, as we've both had to try to deal with Batista1's disruptive edits. Thanks – Richard BB 09:46, 21 October 2012 (UTC)Reply

TLC 12

edit

With this edit, you removed many secondary sources (like Wrestleview) from the background section and replaced them with primary sources (WWE.com), citing that they are "official". You also deleted a WebCite screenshot archive of a WWE.com page. Simply... may I ask why? Wikipedia policy clearly states that "Wikipedia articles should be based mainly on reliable secondary sources". For the background section, it chronicles past events, not future ones, and there are many readily available reliable secondary sources to be cited. I would understand if you want to use WWE.com to cite the scheduled future matches, but the background section is not about that. Only the matches section is about that. Also, the removal of the WebCite is definitely head-scratching. Please do follow up by reading and discussing on Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Professional wrestling#Usage of primary sources (WWE.com) for PPVs. Starship.paint (talk) 18:43, 28 November 2012 (UTC)Reply

December 2012

edit

  Hello, I'm Odie5533. I noticed that you made a change to an article, TLC: Tables, Ladders & Chairs (2012), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Odie5533 (talk) 15:09, 9 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Sorry for warning you the second time. I did not examine the change close enough and you did add sources to the article. Thank you for doing so. I removed the content originally because some of the previous content that was added and was similarly unsourced. I went through a lot of the previous content and added sources, but in doing so I realized some of it was original research which didn't coincide with the sources. Given that some the recent content was by the same editor, who is now blocked, and it did not have a source either, I was worried it might be original research as well and so I moved it to the talk page. Thank you again for finding sources for this information, and I apologize for mistakenly issuing the second warning. --Odie5533 (talk) 16:58, 9 December 2012 (UTC)Reply

Jack Lanza

edit

He started off as Jack Lanza, and even when he was called Blackjack Lanza, it was acknowledged that was a nickname, and that his first name was actually (but not actually) Jack. Like how Triple H's "real name" is Hunter, and The Rock's is Rocky. It's the more common ringname, so it's a good edit. But the summary was a bit off. Not scolding you or anything, just letting you know. InedibleHulk (talk) 22:22, 18 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

GA Thanks

edit

On behalf of WP:CHICAGO, I would like to thank you for your editorial contributions to Extreme Rules (2012), which has recently become a GA. --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 01:03, 22 January 2013 (UTC)Reply

R-Truth theme

edit

May 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to The Usos may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:06, 29 May 2013 (UTC)Reply

June 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of WWE personnel may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {| class="wikitable sortable" align="left center" style="width:65%;"
  • |Senior Vice President, Creative & Development<ref>{{cite web|url=http://corporate.wwe.com/news/2012/2012_02_01.jsp|title=WWE Corporate - WWE Appoints

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:17, 27 June 2013 (UTC)Reply

"Over" 30 days

edit

Could you show me where "It has been mentioned before about not adding the word over in"? I've searched the talk page and its two archives, and have found nothing. — Richard BB 13:25, 18 July 2013 (UTC)Reply

August 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of WWE Champions may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:49, 28 August 2013 (UTC)Reply

RE: The Shield

edit

Because I have better things to do than cleaning-up what other people do. Tbhotch. Grammatically incorrect? Correct it! See terms and conditions. 19:12, 16 September 2013 (UTC)Reply

October 2013

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of WWE personnel may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • {| class="wikitable sortable" align="left center" style="width:65%;"
  • |Inactive; filming ''Leprechaun: Origins''<ref>{{cite web|url=http://www.wrestlinginc.com/wi/news/2013/1008/566220/john-cena-talks-his-return-on-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 12:41, 9 October 2013 (UTC)Reply

Reference Errors on 28 January

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:19, 29 January 2014 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

List of wrestlers in WWE video games (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Big Boss Man, John Morrison, Nick Patrick, Charles Robinson, Pat Patterson and Muhammad Hassan

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 10 May 2014 (UTC)Reply

October 2014

edit

  Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John Laurinaitis may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • ** "John [[Laryngitis]]" (bestowed upon by [[Santino Marella]]

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:58, 8 October 2014 (UTC)Reply

WP:PW/RS

edit

Hi Jeffhardyred, please familiarize yourself with the reliable source list. WrestleZone is in the unreliable sources list as well. In fact, please treat anything not on Websites proven reliable to be unreliable. Thank you! :) starship.paint ~ ¡Olé! 00:22, 26 January 2015 (UTC)Reply

WWE and NXT

edit

Hi. To include somebody in the main roster, we need his profile in WWE.com. Kalisto wrestled some matches in the WWE main roster, but his profile stills in NXT, so he stills in NXT. Emma's profile is in the main roster, so she isn't listed in NXT. --HHH Pedrigree (talk) 15:39, 8 March 2015 (UTC)Reply

Aiden O'Shea

edit

Obvisiouly You Didn't do your research before Vandalizing the Jay Bradley Page His New Wrestling Name Is In Fact Aiden O'Shea he wrestles for TNA he began wrestling for TNA again on July 22, 2015 which was a TNA Taping it's something that will give on TV in September or October so just because you haven't seen him on tv yet doesn't mean he isn't a wrestler there so I would appreciate if you would undo your edit on his page before I repost the information there.... Go do some research about Aiden O'Shea before you start making claims of what you think you know visit Twitter.com search @AidenOSheaTNA Google Aiden O'Shea then after that undo your edit on the Jay Bradley page and things will be okay and you'll have learned not to assume things you have no clue about JMichael22 (talk) 16:17, 7 August 2015 (UTC)Reply

KOTM

edit

The promotion parameter is not just for the promotion that owns the title but the promotion in which the title appears. See NWA World Middleweight Championship and NWA World Welterweight Championship as examples.--WillC 18:13, 21 September 2015 (UTC)Reply

IRS

edit

I absentmindedly reverted your edit by mistake regarding Rotunda/IRS while dealing with another issue...sorry about that.

Vjmlhds (talk) 14:53, 8 October 2015 (UTC)Reply

Award 4 U

edit

ArbCom elections are now open!

edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:57, 24 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Jeffhardyred. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

Keep an eye on List of WWE personnel

edit

User:Galatz has been known to remove the profile links of Pete Dunne, Trent Seven and Tyler Bate on the List of WWE personnel page. He thinks that they need NXT UK profiles instead of their NXT profiles on WWE.com. I don't know if WWE will put up a NXT UK roster section soon or not, but I'm just warning you of this user's history on the page. --Keith Okamoto (talk) 13:42, 6 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

You mean my silly need to follow WP:V? What possibly could I be thinking! - Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 14:18, 6 July 2018 (UTC)Reply
Your revisions, as I stated above are a violation of WP:V as you are claiming they are on NXT UK without providing any source to confirm this. Professional wrestling is now under general sanctions and adding unsourced information could lead to you being blocked from editing all professional wrestling articles on Wikipedia. - Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 16:51, 6 July 2018 (UTC)Reply

Please pay attention when you edit

edit

Firstly you are listing people who were on TV this week as inactive. You need to pay attention to these things. In addition please use the preview button before publishing changes. Your reason additions had tons of error messages and broke tables. - Galatz גאליץשיחה Talk 12:38, 2 August 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Jeffhardyred. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

Problem with your custom signature

edit

You have a custom signature set in your account preferences. A change to Wikipedia's software has made your current custom signature incompatible with the software.

The problem: Your preferences are set to interpret your custom signature as wikitext. However, your current custom signature does not contain any wikitext.

The solutions: You can reset your signature to the default, or you can fix your signature.

Solution 1: Reset your signature to the default:
  1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
  2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
  3. Remove anything in the Signature: text box. (It might already be empty.)
  4. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page. (The red "Restore all default settings" button will reset all of your preference settings, not just the signature.)
Solution 2: Fix your custom signature:
  1. Find the signature section in the first tab of Special:Preferences.
  2. Uncheck the box (☑︎→☐) that says "Treat the above as wiki markup."
  3. Click the blue "Save" button at the bottom of the page.

More information about custom signatures is available at Wikipedia:Signatures#Customizing how everyone sees your signature. If you have followed these instructions and still want help, please leave a message at Wikipedia talk:Signatures. Thank you. 18:03, 7 September 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:44, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply