Jeanine (2018)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bonné de Bod (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Calliopejen1 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bonné de Bod and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bonné de Bod, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:29, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Hello, Jeanine (2018)! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Calliopejen1 (talk) 21:29, 24 June 2021 (UTC)

Thanks, I shall look how I can improve it. (Jeanine (2018) (talk) 10:43, 25 June 2021 (UTC))

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bonné de Bod (July 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Bonné de Bod may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Bogger (talk) 15:07, 10 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks @Bogger: but unfortunately I didn't see this before I saw that @Materialscientist: has deleted the draft. If I recreate the draft: Bonné Draft, use my own words and remove this two problematical websites, will you please review it again? Thank you. (Jeanine (2018) (talk) 18:50, 11 July 2021 (UTC))

There's a drive on the backlog of draft articles, so I've done a few reviews lately, and can't remember the specifics of this one. But ping me here, when you've recreated it. If you have a conflict of interest, you must declare it. For new articles, I find it helpful to create/update the wikidata page with referenced facts (date of birth, full name, imdb page, nationality...) d:Q100343266 .Bogger (talk) 19:55, 11 July 2021 (UTC)

Thanks @Bogger:, I shall let you know. No, I haven't a conflict of interest. Okay I'll try that on Wikidata. (Jeanine (2018) (talk) 21:52, 14 July 2021 (UTC))

Hey @Bogger:. I recreated the Bonné de Bod draft and would be glad if you can read it and let me know if there is anything that must be added. Maybe more references? Can I also used Youtube interwiews as references, external links? I am not sure how to get my draft reviewed, because the link that should be above a draft isn't there. Thank you very much for your help. (Jeanine (2018) (talk) 14:41, 26 July 2021 (UTC))

Oh, and I'm not sure how to add date of birth and other things on Wikidata. (Jeanine (2018) (talk) 14:45, 26 July 2021 (UTC))

@Bogger:, okay. That is fine. (Jeanine (2018) (talk) 10:45, 27 July 2021 (UTC))

AfC notification: Draft:Bonné de Bod has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bonné de Bod. Thanks! Bogger (talk) 15:14, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you very much, sorry I haven't time to do anything, but I hope to work on it tonight, (South African time). (Jeanine (2018) (talk) 09:41, 27 July 2021 (UTC))

AfC notification: Draft:Bonné de Bod has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bonné de Bod. Thanks! Bogger (talk) 15:18, 26 July 2021 (UTC)

Thank you so much, {ping|Bogger}. I see you put the comment by Leon van Nierop in inverted commas. Is that fine or should I remove the hole comment? The University of Pretoria's alumna profile-link of Bonné that you put in was the one with copyright which I had to remove,should I look for a similar link without copyright? Thanks for the references you put in! I will search for the others. Not all of the interview references with De Bod are in English, much in Afrikaans and I can't use that, can I? (Jeanine (2018) (talk) 10:40, 27 July 2021 (UTC))

Direct quotes, used sparingly are fine, especially for opinions or quotes, rather than facts. You can link from any reliable source, copyright violations happen when the contents are copied. Yes Afrikaans is fine :) Bogger (talk) 12:00, 27 July 2021 (UTC)

Hallo @Bogger:. I put in some references. It's very difficult to search for and when I put it in, it looks like some won't go back to the website?! I must look for something else. (Jeanine (2018) (talk) 11:15, 3 August 2021 (UTC))

And can I use podcast/youtube videos as references too?(Jeanine (2018) (talk) 11:16, 3 August 2021 (UTC))

@Jeanine (2018): Podcasts and youtube are ok, if the publisher/creator is independent of the source, and they are regular creators. If the subject is the interviewee in a podcast, it shows they are notable. A youtube clip from a named journalist or media company is better than a clip from a fan.Bogger (talk) 16:51, 3 August 2021 (UTC)

Thank you so much, @Bogger:. There is a lot of such youtube videos. (Jeanine (2018) (talk) 17:02, 3 August 2021 (UTC))

Hallo @Bogger:. I put in the references, and a few videos. I don't know if there is maybe something that is still missing. Thanks for your help, I hope the draft will be fine this time when reviewed. How must I give it up to get it reviewed? (Jeanine (2018) (talk) 12:37, 4 August 2021 (UTC))

hey, @Jeanine (2018):, there are still sentences that are copy/pasted. They must be paraphrased or removed. See report. Bogger (talk) 13:36, 4 August 2021 (UTC)

O, sorry @Bogger: I must say I I am not sure what to change and how to change it. Thank you so much for what you have already changed! I will look if I can do something. (Jeanine (2018) (talk) 18:17, 4 August 2021 (UTC))

@Bogger:, finally I understand how the copyright violation report works! I changed a few words, hope it's right. Thanks again! (Jeanine (2018) (talk) 19:00, 4 August 2021 (UTC))

Hallo @Bogger:. Thanks for all you help. I have learned alot! It made my day when I saw that the draft is an article! I will try to use the pic that is on the Afrikaans wiki, I only want to find out about the copyright by Bonné de Bod to put it on Commons. (Jeanine (2018) (talk) 19:16, 5 August 2021 (UTC))

Hallo @Bogger:. I want to put the photo of De Bod that's on the Afrikaans Wikipedia on Wikimedia Commons. De Bod emailed me and said it would be fine with Susan Scott, the photographer. May I upload the photo with Wizard or do I have to ask Scott to send an email with her permission to the email address that is shown somewhere first? Thanks. (Jeanine (2018) (talk) 07:02, 20 August 2021 (UTC))

I've never worked with images. Try the wiki commons help desk - Bogger (talk) 09:06, 20 August 2021 (UTC)

Okay, thanks! (Jeanine (2018) (talk) 17:01, 21 August 2021 (UTC))

AfC notification: Draft:Susan Scott (filmmaker) has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Susan Scott (filmmaker). Thanks! Greenman (talk) 11:24, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Thanks for letting me know @Greenman:! I'm still searching for a source. I contacted Susan Scott indirectly, and that's how I got some of the personal stuff. Do you recommend that I remove the 'Personal Life' until I got a source or can I just say I got the information from her? Or is that not a reliable source? Thanks again. Jeanine (2018) (talk) 11:55, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Yes, if it cannot be reliably sourced, it should be removed. See Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons. Greenman (talk) 13:20, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Okay, thank you. I shall remove it, until I can prove it. Jeanine (2018) (talk) 13:29, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

My wêreld, dit nadat ek moes sukkel met 'n woordeboek langs my om my Engels te probeer verbeter, moet ek uitvind jy is wel Afrikaans-magtig @Greenman:! Jeanine (2018) (talk) 13:35, 4 April 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Susan Scott (filmmaker) has been accepted

Susan Scott (filmmaker), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 01:01, 29 June 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Grethe Barret Holby

Hello, Jeanine (2018). This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Grethe Barret Holby, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 13:04, 3 August 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Kingdoms of Fire, Ice & Fairy Tales

Hello, Jeanine (2018). This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Kingdoms of Fire, Ice & Fairy Tales, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 3 September 2022 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Kingdoms of Fire, Ice & Fairy Tales

Hello, Jeanine (2018). It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Kingdoms of Fire".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 15:52, 3 October 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)