Notability of Ninjas N Da Hood

edit
 

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Ninjas N Da Hood, by Seattlenow (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Ninjas N Da Hood seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Ninjas N Da Hood, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it did not nominate Ninjas N Da Hood itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 04:13, 6 July 2007 (UTC)Reply


Image without license

edit

Unspecified source for Image:MattNathanson1.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading Image:MattNathanson1.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, then you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, then their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Fair use, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 03:39, 28 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? --MifterBot (TalkContribsOwner) 03:39, 28 July 2008 (UTC)Reply


Disputed fair use rationale for File:Live in concert.jpg}

edit

Thank you for uploading File:Live in concert.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image under "fair use" may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies for fair use. In particular, for each page the image is used on, the image must have an explanation linking to that page which explains why it needs to be used on that page. Can you please check:

  • That there is a non-free use rationale on the image's escription page for each article the image is used in.
  • That every article it is used on is linked to from its description page.

Please be aware that a fair use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the fair use policy require both a copyright tag and a fair use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it might be deleted by adminstrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 03:36, 14 April 2009 (UTC)Reply


For years, Cracker has hosted a 2-day fall music festival in Pioneertown, California known as Campout. This festival usually includes performances by both Cracker and Camper Van Beethoven and numerous other bands and musicians and is well noted for its opportunities for fan interaction.

Source: http://www.crackersoul.com/campout/past.shtml

In 2008, Rehab had its first hit on the Billboard Hot 100 with "Bartender Song." This was a reworked version of the band's song "Sittin' at a Bar," which was released in 2000 on the band's debut,Southern Discomfort. "Bartender Song" went to chart on many other pop, rock, and country charts. This caused a surge in sales of Graffiti The World, which went on to peak at #1 on the Billboard Heatseekers Chart.

Source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bartender_Song_%28Sittin%27_at_a_Bar%29

http://www.billboard.com/#/artist/rehab/383462

{{unblock|I have attempted to produce above what I believe would be productive edits to articles. This is in coordination with what has been suggested by Wikipedia volunteers in order to earn the trust of the Wikipedia community. I hope these are suitable edits that which allow me restitution and a second chance to be a productive editor. However, if these edits are not suitable, please inform me what I can do to improve. Thank you for your time.}}

 

Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

I'm going to go ahead and give you some rope, what you do with it is up to you. A return to your previous behavior will likely result in an indefinite block without further warning, since you are already well aware of our policies on vandalism now.

Request handled by: Beeblebrox (talk)

Unblocking administrator: Please check for active autoblocks on this user after accepting the unblock request.

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jason Swepson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tom O'Brien (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:41, 12 April 2013 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rich Skrosky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page FCS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:11, 31 August 2014 (UTC)Reply

Orphaned non-free image File:Live in Concert (Gin Blossoms album) coverart.jpg

edit
 

Thanks for uploading File:Live in Concert (Gin Blossoms album) coverart.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:42, 1 February 2022 (UTC)Reply