Notability of Terrill Shaw edit

 

A tag has been placed on Terrill Shaw requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article appears to be about a real person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable. If this is the first page that you have created, then you should read the guide to writing your first article.

If you think that you can assert the notability of the subject, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Napsterbater (talk) 04:55, 17 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


PLEASE USE "College years" not "College Years" -- PLEASE USE "High school years" not "High School Years" -- this is Wikipedia policy, thanks Jcurtis. Pats1 T/C 20:12, 10 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

If you come back edit

DO NOT continue to create Arena Football League player articles with their full name. Such as William Yaw Obeng it should be William Obeng. Crash Underride 21:41, 15 October 2008 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Physioball push ups edit

 

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Physioball push ups, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

WP:DICTDEF, unimproved since 9-07 tagging.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. THF (talk) 15:20, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of Anthony Floyd edit

 

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated article is Anthony Floyd. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Anthony Floyd. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:07, 5 December 2009 (UTC)Reply

Unreferenced BLPs edit

  Hello Jcurtis! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 18 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to insure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. if you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 941 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

  1. Ricky Sharpe - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  2. Saul Patu - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  3. Reggie Lee (American football) - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  4. Vernon Fox - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  5. Kerry McCoy - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  6. Jamill Kelly - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  7. Anthony Floyd - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  8. Skyler Fulton - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  9. Cal Lee - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL
  10. Mark Brubaker - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 21:31, 8 January 2010 (UTC)Reply

This site is biased. I wish to delete my account and disassociate myself with this site.

Nomination of Greg Saporta for deletion edit

 

A discussion has begun about whether the article Greg Saporta, which you created or to which you contributed, should be deleted. While contributions are welcome, an article may be deleted if it is inconsistent with Wikipedia policies and guidelines for inclusion, explained in the deletion policy.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Saporta until a consensus is reached, and you are welcome to contribute to the discussion.

You may edit the article during the discussion, including to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. NW (Talk) 04:03, 2 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Mark Brubaker edit

 

The article Mark Brubaker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP for a year and a half. Didn't play an NFL match and therefore fails the American football criteria of WP:NSPORTS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jenks24 (talk) 10:21, 29 December 2010 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Shawn Morgan edit

 

The article Shawn Morgan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP for over a year. Failed to play a match in the NFL or any other professional league (as far as I can tell NFL Europe is not considered fully professional) and therefore fails the American football requirements of WP:NSPORTS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jenks24 (talk) 06:20, 3 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Skyler Fulton edit

 

The article Skyler Fulton has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unreferenced BLP for over a year. Did not play a match in the NFL or the MLB, therefore failing the American football and baseball requirements of WP:NSPORTS.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Jenks24 (talk) 06:26, 3 January 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Brandon Register for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brandon Register is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brandon Register until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Whpq (talk) 17:44, 6 July 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Joseph Todd edit

 

The article Joseph Todd has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Absolutely no reliable or non social media sources available about the record labels or him.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Bgwhite (talk) 07:25, 3 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Wade Koehl for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Wade Koehl is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Wade Koehl until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Hullaballoo Wolfowitz (talk) 21:34, 15 November 2011 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Charles Matthews (American football) edit

 

The article Charles Matthews (American football) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:ATHLETE, no evidence of playing at a professional level. Fails WP:GNG, no 3rd party sources to show notability

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Tassedethe (talk) 16:11, 22 July 2012 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom elections are now open! edit

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Delvin Lamar Hughley for deletion edit

 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Delvin Lamar Hughley is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Delvin Lamar Hughley until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Basalisk inspect damageberate 17:36, 21 July 2017 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Jimmie Kaylor edit

 

The article Jimmie Kaylor has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NCOLLATH, WP:NGRIDIRON, WP:GNG.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC(talk) 21:16, 26 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of John Moyer for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article John Moyer is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Moyer until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

QuietHere (talk) 07:04, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Carl Gioia for deletion edit

 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Carl Gioia is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Carl Gioia until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Joeykai (talk) 04:27, 25 October 2023 (UTC)Reply