Jcoleman04

Speedy deletion of "Olivier Kamanda"

A page you created, Olivier Kamanda, has been tagged for deletion in accordance with our deletion policy. In particular, it meets one or more criteria for speedy deletion; the relevant criterion is:

Author requests deletion, if requested in good faith, and provided the page's only substantial content was added by its author. If the author blanks the page, this can be taken as a deletion request.

As you created the page, and have removed all content from it, it is assumed that you wish for it to be deleted. If this is not the case, you should restore the previous content of the page

If you have any questions, please contact an administrator for assistance. Thank you – Gurch 05:32, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Tagging Foreign Policy Digest for deletion

Hello, Jcoleman04 ... I recently encountered the article about Foreign Policy Digest while performing either New Page Patrol, Recent changes patrol, or Counter-Vandalism Unit activities, and in my opinion as a Wikipedia editor, it either lacks sufficient Attribution that it satisfies the notability criteria for Web content, or it may violate the Conflict of interest guideline, or perhaps it reads like blatant Vanispmcruftisment.

The point is that I plan to tag Foreign Policy Digest (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) with either a {{prod}} that explains my reasons why I believe that it should be deleted, or else a {{db-web}} tag for speedy deletion (CSD A7).

I have created this initial entry on your Talk page because you are either the original author of the article or a recent contributor to it; I will leave more detailed information regarding my specific concerns about the article on its Discussion page ... please respond either there or on this Talk page, instead of on my Talk page, in order to avoid fragmenting the conversation.

Specifically, this website has been around for less than a month, which hardly qualifies it as Notable, nor does it meet the notability criteria for websites ... references to the subject's own website do not qualify as reliable sources ... Happy Editing! —141.156.234.101 (talk · contribs) 11:45, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

Epilogue: Jcoleman04's response to this warning was to blank the article, so it was tagged with {{db-author}} and it was speedy deleted (G7 - author-requested). —141.156.234.101 (talk) 20:21, 23 November 2007 (UTC)

File source problem with File:Olivier Kamanda.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Olivier Kamanda.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 21:30, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Foreign Policy Digest

The article Foreign Policy Digest has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

NN student magazine.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Cameron Scott (talk) 15:21, 6 November 2011 (UTC)

Nomination of Olivier Kamanda for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Olivier Kamanda is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Olivier Kamanda until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. BennyHillbilly (talk) 04:38, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Your recent copy and pasted text to Karl Racine

Greetings. Please do not copy and paste text into Wikipedia, as you have done here and here. For further guidance, see WP:C-P and if you wish to make further edits, consider WP:NPOV. Thank you. Ohnohedinnit (talk) 06:21, 6 August 2014 (UTC)