JayzRaptorz
- Hey Tcbmotors! I don't really think Info Wiki is particularly notable. It doesn't seem to meet web guidelines or attributability. Also I think there's a conflict of interest with you (the creator of the wiki) creating/editing an article about it. Seeing as you are the article creator, I thought I would give you a heads up that I plan on nominating it for deletion in the near future. Wickethewok 23:48, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
I changed the link from "airport" to "List of airports in Ontario" as it seems like a better focus. It's similar to the airports in Canada template. I was curious as to why list Hamilton/John C. Munro International Airport as a major airport. If you look at List of Canada's busiest airports it doesn't even rank in the top 15. In Ontario the top airports in terms of busiest are Toronto Pearson, Toronto/Buttonville, Ottawa Macdonald-Cartier, Region of Waterloo, Thunder Bay, London International, Toronto City Centre and then Hamilton. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 21:37, 23 April 2007 (UTC)
It's inappropriate for the plain title Kitchener to be a redirect to Kitchener, Ontario rather than a disambiguation page, as the city does not have a strong claim to being the primary meaning of the word. Wikipedia's standard for determining whether a city gets "City" or "City, Province" has to do with primary meanings (which is why, for example, places like Victoria, British Columbia, London, Ontario, Regina, Saskatchewan and Windsor, Ontario can't be moved.) A city does not get automatic entitlement to an undisambiguated title. Bearcat 07:33, 5 May 2007 (UTC)
sandhills school edit
Sandhills Public School edit
I have added a "{{prod}}" template to the article Sandhills Public School, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached.
For elementary schools, it is usually necessary links to outside reference source, and some real content to show its distinctive -- see WP:N DGG 19:01, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Westheights edit
While il leave this up to you to decide, i think you should remove some of the info from the West heights article. I think the reason you added so much to the article cause you go there or you know somethin bout the school. I would remvoe all the teachers but the Principal and V.P from the list (or take it all out)
Also i think it might help if you get rid of the text below the teachers. Leave a repsonse on my talk page with any thoughts or concerns.
Mr.Deathhawk 18:06, 1 December 2007 (UTC)
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Rapid Transit in Waterloo Region, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Rapid Transit in Waterloo Region. 206.186.8.66 (talk) 17:39, 10 March 2008 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:18, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
MfD nomination of Portal:Edmonton edit
Portal:Edmonton, a page which you created or substantially contributed to, has been nominated for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; you may participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Portal:Edmonton and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of Portal:Edmonton during the discussion but should not remove the miscellany for deletion template from the top of the page; such a removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 11:52, 17 August 2019 (UTC)