Javelez2

Javelez2, you are invited to the Teahouse!

Hi Javelez2! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Rosiestep (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

Peer Review Your article has a lot of technical terms in the lead so it may be more effective to use more layperson speak. It may also be helpful to add a diagram where it explains the structure of the microspore under morphology. One thing I really like about it so far is the amount of references to other Wiki pages and the attention to detail. Brburke (talk) 02:22, 6 April 2017 (UTC)

Peer Review August Beers I really like you citation for the Microspore Embrogenisis section, it has been cited many times according to google scholar and definitely counts as a good source as far as wikipedia is concerned. That being said your description of the contents of the paper is a little heard to read. I would start of by changing "This process is the most effective way of yielding" to "Microspore Embrogenisis is a common process utilized by spores an effective way of yielding" just to be a little more clear. The remaining two sentences in the section suffer from the problem Brburke identified that they do not provide enough info to a non technical writer. After finishing the section, I am left wondering why it is important to the Micro-spore topic. Perhaps you need a conclusion sentence which summarizes why Embrogenisis is important to microspores. — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdbeersBB2030 (talk • contribs) 22:54, 11 April 2017 (UTC)