Javabrain

Your recent contributions do not establish the notability of their subjects for the purposes of an encyclopaedia. If you do not establish their notability soon, they are very likely to all be deleted. --Fire Star 04:09, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Nonsense articles

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Fire Star 04:16, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Deletions

You need to contribute articles, not fantasies, if you don't want your "stuff" deleted. The following links may help you make that distinction:

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

Until then, as a Wikipedia administrator, I am entrusted with the tools to remove nonsense articles. --Fire Star 04:30, 18 April 2006 (UTC)

Old man tasty and the lords of the future

A tag has been placed on Old man tasty and the lords of the future, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable (see the guidelines for notability here). If you can indicate why the subject of this article is notable, you may contest the tagging. To do this, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself.

Please read the criteria for speedy deletion (specifically, article #7) and our general biography criteria. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Kavadi carrier 00:05, 6 November 2006 (UTC)

Greetings

Thanks for the email. The most important requirements for having an article survive is whether or not it satisfies WP:Notability, is propoerly sourced and doesn't rely on your own findings. If you create a new article that doesn't go against those three policies, then it is likely to survive the recent changes patrol. Cheers, --Fire Star 火星 13:39, 6 November 2006 (UTC)