Jasonmillais

Hello Jason. I notice you have been editing Millais related pages. Are you a relative of the artist? Paul B 09:29, 28 November 2006 (UTC)

COI

My question, coming a dozen years after Paul Barlow's, has to do with whether you're top-loading articles with references to books you've written. In at least one instance, you've added a link to an interview of Jason Rosenfeld in the Brooklyn Rail [1]. This is not to question your expertise, which appears to be considerable, but it is an issue if you've edited here with the intention of self-citing, and have never divulged a conflict of interest. So, below is the applicable note. Thank you, 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:03, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Jasonmillais. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 01:03, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Is this how to respond to your perfectly reasonable question? All the edits I have recently made are relevant. I am updating outdated pages and correcting inaccuracies. I have cited my own and other publications in the process. I do not believe I am top-loading articles. Many of these entries have not been updated since the late Dr. Barlow edited them years ago. Please advise. Jasonmillais (talk) 01:39, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

• Thanks for your response. If you are adding links to your own publications, or those of your associates, then conflict of interest may be relevant. Similarly, if you're adding links in Wikipedia articles to interviews about yourself or your associates, then that can constitute a similarly sticky direction. Conflict of interest doesn't automatically invalidate the substance or content of such edits, but it's wise to be transparent. Your openness is greatly appreciated. 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:47, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

• And for what it's worth, and notwithstanding the above, your contributions here are welcome. I just had another look at Brooklyn Rail, and its issues are of another order: the plenitude of links to interviews and articles is, to put it diplomatically, problematic. Cheers, 2601:188:180:11F0:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 02:53, 2 August 2018 (UTC)

Image without license

===Unspecified source/license for File:Mrs. Sophia Margaret (Gray) Caird 1880.jpg

===

Thanks for uploading File:Mrs. Sophia Margaret (Gray) Caird 1880.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time after the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|cc-by-sa-4.0}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:File copyright tags

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: Once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 15:45, 9 January 2020 (UTC)

WP:ENGVAR

Read it and respect it please! Johnbod (talk) 01:48, 10 January 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:32, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

November 2021

Hello, I'm TJRC. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Neil Jenney, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 04:17, 7 November 2021 (UTC)

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Neil Jenney, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. TJRC (talk) 21:52, 8 November 2021 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for February 8

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Alex Kanevsky, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tamworth. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 8 February 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 29 November 2022 (UTC)