Hi Jasmen. You have posted a number of articles which I have tagged with {{db-empty}}. The problem is not with the article subjects, which I have not examined, but rather the lack of of almost any information. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for threshold information. Please take particular note of the following:

A stub is an article that is too short to be genuinely useful, but not so short as to be useless. In general, it must be long enough to at least define the article's title, which generally means 3 to 10 short sentences.

The articles, as posted, contain barely one sentence. It would be great of you took just a little more time on each one to provide basic information so they reach stub status. Thanks and happy editing!--Fuhghettaboutit 21:33, 15 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Hello. I don't know what your position is at USAK. However, even though you dont like its criticisms to be included in the article, we have to adhere to Wikipedia:NPOV - which also means that criticism should be presented to any subject. I am sorry if you feel offended, but please dont labet it as attacks when criticism is added to an article. Bertilvidet 07:55, 11 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Ha ha. Even though you are very cautious about keeping a high profile (i.e. "non-nationalistic") among users who do not understand Turkish or aware of your split with ASAM (for reasons I don't know why, well that's market economy anyway) you will not be able to conceal that you are a primarily Turkish nationalist and particularly anti-Armenian institution. No matter how hard you try you won't keep Wikipedia as the space you have the ultimate reputation. Keep it better next time. ¡Hasta la vista! Behemoth 23:38, 11 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia. Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or a mere collection of external links. You are, however, encouraged to add content instead of links to the encyclopedia. If you feel the link should be added to the article, then please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. See the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. Bertilvidet 08:57, 25 August 2006 (UTC)Reply

Welcome!

edit
Welcome!


Hello, Jasmen, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck or looking for help, please come to the Wikipedia Help Desk, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user talk page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions.

Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, or ask the people around you for help -- good Wikipedians don't bite the newcomers. Keep an open mind and listen for advice, but don't hesitate to be bold when editing!

If you'd like to respond to this message, or ask any questions, feel free to leave a message at my talk page!

Once you've become a more experienced Wikipedian, you may wish to take a moment to visit these pages:

Best of luck to you, and happy editing!

Luna Santin 10:40, 29 July 2006 (UTC)Reply

Biga Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences

edit

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Biga Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. ˉˉanetode╦╩ 00:54, 20 July 2007 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Ali Akdemir

edit
 

The article Ali Akdemir has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced, notability therefore unclear

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SlimVirgin talk|contribs 03:15, 12 July 2010 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Samsun–Ceyhan pipeline for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samsun–Ceyhan pipeline is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samsun–Ceyhan pipeline until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chidgk1 (talk) 08:54, 2 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

Nomination of Dost TV for deletion

edit
 
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dost TV is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dost TV until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chidgk1 (talk) 18:41, 30 August 2024 (UTC)Reply