July 2011
editWhat kind of nonsense is this? Personal grudge? A quick look at your edit history proves that you are the one here with a personal interest--the only thing you do is here insert peacock language. This is an encyclopedia, not a place of worship. Drmies (talk) 20:49, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- I created this in order to comment on the posts, i was against the peacok till one of my firends decided to apply to the University and was recommended by a leading job hunt company who also claims what is said in the aritcle, ref. http://www.universities.com/edu/Associate_degree_in_Professional_Aeronautics_at_Embry_Riddle_Aeronautical_University_Worldwide.html
http://www.universities.com/edu/Associate_degree_in_Professional_Aeronautics_at_Embry_Riddle_Aeronautical_University_Worldwide.htmlJao234 (talk) 20:51, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
- I am not sure what any of this means. What I do know is WP:RS and WP:PEACOCK. Knowing such guidelines is a burden for Wikipedia editors, but a necessary one. My employer claims to have "excellence" as a standard--that's peacocky too. Drmies (talk) 21:11, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
Edit war
editHello. You appear to be involved in an edit war on Embry–Riddle Aeronautical University. While the three-revert rule is hard and fast, please be aware that you can be blocked for edit warring without making 3 reverts to an article in 24 hours. You are not entitled to 3 reverts and are expected to cooperatively engage other editors on talk pages rather than reverting their edits. Note that posting your thoughts on the talk page alone is not a license to continue reverting. You must reach consensus. Continued edit warring may cause you to be blocked. Toddst1 (talk) 21:01, 11 July 2011 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Toddst1 (talk) 21:27, 11 July 2011 (UTC)