Speedy deletion nomination of Madasamy Ravi edit

 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Madasamy Ravi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Robert McClenon (talk) 05:37, 16 August 2017 (UTC)Reply

Ways to improve Select Committee on Deliberate Online Falsehoods edit

Hi, I'm Dan Koehl. Jane Dawson, thanks for creating Select Committee on Deliberate Online Falsehoods!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Please categorize

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse.

Dan Koehl (talk) 17:58, 23 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

Disambiguation link notification for November 11 edit

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Foreign relations of Singapore, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Pedra Branca (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 11 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message edit

Hello, Jane Dawson. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

Following another user's edits edit

Hey Jane Dawson!

Hope you are doing well. I just had a look at this timeline of your edits recently compared to another editor's.. and I am a bit concerned you may be HOUNDing them. As you both edit articles related to Singapore, I'll chalk this[1][2] up to coincidence. However, if this happens a little too often, and Feinoa begins to feel unsafe; it likely will become a greater issue.

Like I said, I'm WP:AGF right now, and I know you to be capable of following proper WP:Dispute resolution process if so needed. Cheers! –MJLTalk 03:47, 14 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Good day, MJL. Thank you for your reminder. I am fully aware of the policy of WP:HOUND and will abide to it.Jane Dawson (talk) 04:27, 14 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

Are you studying at Harvard? edit

Your user page ==

Hi. Just had a look at your page.

Are you studying at Harvard, political science? 128.106.175.188 (talk) 13:00, 13 June 2018 (UTC)Reply

re: "I am a political science student at Harvard."
I am interested to know as well. Are you a student there, or previously? ~~
- 115.42.134.138 (talk) 10:06, 10 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
She said she is, not sure how she could be more clear. Regardless, you don't need to know anything about her and she doesn't need to tell you. There is literally no reason you need to know. Captain Eek Edits Ho Cap'n! 03:33, 18 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
IP, please understand that editors are under no compulsion to reveal their personal information. Continuing to ask for such information and bringing it up might constitute harassment.--DreamLinker (talk) 03:48, 18 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
I will PM you if you can reply with an account that has the same number of edits as me. Jane Dawson (talk) 04:59, 18 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
I don't follow your talk page so just saw this. Mere guess here but I think some of your recent edits may have aroused suspicions. Like this one - (https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Central_Provident_Fund&diff=852030126&oldid=851574170). Because of the inappropriate content, people could speculate you are Roy Ngerng himself, pasting the entire court case to promote your cause. And later, multipe editors tried to remove them but were reverted by admins - perhaps they relied on your "Harvard student" persona to judge if they should do so. Everyone has some bias.
Since you are prepared to private message an established editor, why not a simple Y/N answer for the rest? If you think "it's complicated" and maybe it is, I know of admins who are entrusted with verifying confidential matters, so they vouch for relevant documents you send them for verification. You can look for one or I can help, one who can then simply tell us your reasons are valid. You have some supporters here, so removing any remaining doubts will make all our future discussions more pleasant. Doable? 111.65.63.126 (talk) 03:41, 19 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
I am not sure why you are so obsessed with my talk page, but I can tell you with confidence that I am not Roy Ngerng and I am indeed from Harvard. Does that satisfy your curiosity? Can you now focus on replying on the article talk page? To put an end to this, I won't bother answering your further queries about my personal information and would request admin to block your IP range as this is bordering on harassment. Funny, other editors focus on the discussion at hand while you focus on making ad hominem attacks. Jane Dawson (talk) 03:56, 19 October 2019 (UTC)Reply
Ivy leaguer? Not a believer either. Do not besmirch the Harvard club of sg

Email edit

Hey Jane Dawson. I'm Kevin. If you've got a moment, could you shoot me an email at wikipedia kevinsli.com? It's fine also if you prefer not to email. Best, Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 05:24, 19 October 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message edit

 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply