Welcome!

Hello, Jamestlynch99! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. You may benefit from following some of the links below, which will help you get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking   or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are already excited about Wikipedia, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field when making edits to pages. Happy editing! I dream of horses If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{Ping|I dream of horses}} to your message. (talk to me) (My edits) @ 18:24, 1 November 2015 (UTC)Reply
Getting Started
Getting Help
Policies and Guidelines

The Community
Things to do
Miscellaneous

Nomination of 2022 FIFA World Cup qualification (UEFA) for deletion

edit
 

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article 2022 FIFA World Cup qualification (UEFA) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/2022 FIFA World Cup qualification (UEFA) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris1834 Talk 19:30, 1 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Jamestlynch99, you are invited to the Teahouse!

edit
 

Hi Jamestlynch99! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! 78.26 (I'm a Teahouse host)

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 18:39, 2 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

November 2015

edit

  Greetings. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to 2018 FIFA World Cup qualification (UEFA), did not appear to be constructive and has been or will be reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. In addition to the above mentioned article, your edits at 2022 FIFA World Cup and 2011 Nations Cup also did not appear to be constructive. — Jkudlick tcs 12:28, 3 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at UEFA Euro 2016 qualifying. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 23:45, 18 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of 2022 FIFA World Cup qualification (UEFA)

edit
 

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on 2022 FIFA World Cup qualification (UEFA) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Qed237 (talk) 23:05, 8 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

Reference errors on 15 December

edit

  Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. It is as follows:

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:23, 16 December 2015 (UTC)Reply

January 2016

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Republic of Ireland national football team. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted or removed.

  • If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
  • If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Qed237 (talk) 00:19, 4 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing, as you did at 2018 FIFA World Cup qualification (UEFA). Your edits have been or will be reverted or removed.

Do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively may result in your being blocked from editing. — Jkudlick tcs 03:09, 4 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at 2015–16 Premier League. Qed237 (talk) 23:57, 5 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at UEFA Euro 2016 qualifying. Qed237 (talk) 17:41, 8 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

Nick Blackman international eligibility

edit

I see you added back in November that Nick Blackman is eligible to play for Israel. This is not supported by the source here. I've therefore reverted it just now. Thanks, —  Cliftonian (talk)  15:03, 9 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

February 2016

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism, as you did at UEFA Euro 2016 qualifying. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Peacemaker67 (click to talk to me) 01:15, 13 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Robbie Brady. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 18:00, 15 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

Proposed deletion of Daniel Cleary (footballer)

edit
 

The article Daniel Cleary (footballer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:GNG and WP:NFOOTBALL

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JMHamo (talk) 23:01, 18 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to List of EastEnders characters— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 23:41, 22 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

List of EastEnders characters

edit

Hi, if you have questions about the accuracy of the list, you should ask them in a new section on Talk:List of EastEnders characters, adding your new comments to the bottom of the page, instead of writing questions within the list itself. Thanks. AnemoneProjectors 09:21, 23 February 2016 (UTC)Reply

March 2016

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Adam Johnson (footballer). Mattythewhite (talk) 21:07, 4 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Robbie Brady, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Unsourced content. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:14, 21 March 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mattythewhite (talk) 00:17, 26 March 2016 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Luke Hyam, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Alan Judge. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 10 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited UEFA Euro 2016 squads, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vice-captain. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 10 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

May 2016

edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Josh Cullen, you may be blocked from editing. Egghead06 (talk) 04:13, 12 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize pages by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Josh Cullen, you may be blocked from editing. Egghead06 (talk) 16:44, 14 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Brentford F.C.. Mattythewhite (talk) 13:46, 24 May 2016 (UTC)Reply

June 2016

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Republic of Ireland national football team, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Unsourced name. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:34, 9 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mattythewhite (talk) 18:36, 13 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

July 2016

edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to David Forde (footballer). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 12:28, 29 July 2016 (UTC)Reply

August 2016

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia by deliberately introducing incorrect information, as you did at Newcastle United F.C.. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:06, 24 August 2016 (UTC)Reply

September 2016

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Robbie Brady, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Unsourced content. Mattythewhite (talk) 23:21, 4 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Conor Hourihane, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Wagner. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:55, 15 September 2016 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi, thanks for letting me know, I have now edited the link so that it now points to the 'David Wagner' in question - the soccer manager born in 1971 currently managing Huddersfield Town F.C. Please do not hesitate to let me know of anymore of these unintentional mistakes which I may make. Thank you very much.

Proposed deletion of Colin McCabe

edit
 

The article Colin McCabe has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a footballer who fails WP:GNG and who has not played in a fully pro league.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sir Sputnik (talk) 13:56, 24 October 2016 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

edit

Hello, Jamestlynch99. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)Reply

December 2016

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mattythewhite (talk) 00:38, 10 December 2016 (UTC)Reply

February 2017

edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to James McClean. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Mattythewhite (talk) 00:43, 5 February 2017 (UTC)Reply

March 2017

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Neil Taylor (footballer). Mattythewhite (talk) 22:02, 24 March 2017 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited David Meyler, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Defender (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:54, 5 October 2017 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

edit

Hello, Jamestlynch99. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)Reply

January 2018

edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Chelsea F.C.. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Source clearly lists them as midfielders. Mattythewhite (talk) 21:36, 6 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Liverpool F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Forward (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 10 January 2018 (UTC)Reply

March 2018

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Christian Eriksen. Mattythewhite (talk) 02:26, 9 March 2018 (UTC)Reply


  This is your only warning; if you purposefully and blatantly harass fellow Wikipedian(s) again, as you did at User talk:Mattythewhite, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Govvy (talk) 21:30, 12 March 2018 (UTC)Reply

September 2018

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Chelsea F.C., you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Unsourced content. Mattythewhite (talk) 16:24, 22 September 2018 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

edit

Hello, Jamestlynch99. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)Reply

edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tinie Tempah, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Labour Party (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:54, 14 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

July 2019

edit

  Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to 2019–20 Chelsea F.C. season. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Also please see the Wikipedia rules on WP:EDITWAR and WP:3RR. Abhisu4 (talk) 19:49, 28 July 2019 (UTC)Reply

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 19 November 2019 (UTC)Reply

March 2020

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at John O'Shea. Mattythewhite (talk) 20:01, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

June 2020

edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at Stephen Kenny (football manager), you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Unsourced content. Mattythewhite (talk) 01:12, 1 June 2020 (UTC)Reply

July 2020

edit
 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Mattythewhite (talk) 23:07, 9 July 2020 (UTC)Reply

'Reliable' source content is completely subjective. What do you define as subjective. I clearly added source content. Please could you unblock me. Thank you.

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

edit
 Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:48, 24 November 2020 (UTC)Reply