James Morton (User)

May 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent contribution removed content from The Wizard of Oz (1939 film). Please be more careful when editing articles and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason, which should be specified in the edit summary. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. akendall 08:21, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thanks, and happy editing.

--Oscarthecat 08:22, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Somehow your false claim that The Wonderful Wizard of Oz is a fable was retained for some time on The Wizard of Oz (1939 film). Please do not make this change again. If you read the fable page and have any familiarity with what Baum wrote, you will see that you're claim of the book as a "fable" ignores all definitions. --Scottandrewhutchins 14:18, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

License tagging for Image:Winonaryderedwardscisorhands.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Winonaryderedwardscisorhands.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:10, 19 May 2007 (UTC)

Your edits to Burger King

Please do not add unhelpful and unconstructive content to Wikipedia, as you did to Burger King. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Thewinchester ^(talk) 13:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Hello. Please don't forget to provide an edit summary. Thank you. Thewinchester ^(talk) 13:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

Your edits to The Ice Storm

I have reverted your additions to the plot on this article for several reasons, the main one being that you copy-and-pasted it from the film's article page. That is both plagiarism and incorrect; the book does differ from the novel in many respects, and so much of what you added was factually incorrect. Please be more careful in your edits in the future. I also second what the user above stated in that it would be helpful for you to include edit summaries in the future. Thank you. María (habla conmigo) 14:19, 27 May 2007 (UTC)

The Lovely Bones

I have become the latest person to revert some edits of yours, it seems. In this case, I removed the list of film credits you appended to Peter Jackson's name since that practice, while common in film and entertainment magazines, is not how we do things here. I also changed "production" to "preproduction" in the intro since a movie can only be considered in production when it has been cast and cameras are rolling, neither of which are true yet in this instance. Daniel Case 14:15, 2 June 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Winona3.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Winona3.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 22:59, 24 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Edward Scissorhands.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Edward Scissorhands.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 09:27, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Boysdontcry 1.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Boysdontcry 1.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 10:17, 27 October 2007 (UTC)

Disputed fair use rationale for Image:Carrie3 prom scene.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Carrie3 prom scene.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content carefully, then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies for fair use. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 20:26, 29 October 2007 (UTC)

Unreferenced BLPs

Hello James Morton (User)! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 3 of the articles that you created are tagged as Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. The biographies of living persons policy requires that all personal or potentially controversial information be sourced. In addition, to ensure verifiability, all biographies should be based on reliable sources. If you were to bring these articles up to standards, it would greatly help us with the current 874 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:

1. Lawrence D. Cohen - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
2. Mario Tosi - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
3. Gregory M. Auer - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 06:33, 15 January 2010 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)