Welcome!

edit

Hi JamesKnight7! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 08:21, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pyotr Soprunenko (August 28)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Johannes Maximilian was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Johannes (Talk) (Contribs) (Articles) 14:12, 28 August 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Pyotr Soprunenko has been accepted

edit
 
Pyotr Soprunenko, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 08:07, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
You will see that there is also a Polish article, though it appears to lack any citations. There are, however, books. These may form a useful set of sources. The Polish article also documents military (etc) decorations. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 08:23, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Some clues may exist in Wikidata 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 08:40, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Polish and Russian Wikipedias have at least B-class articles on this topic. There's no sources I can use from there though for some weird reason! I'd love to make ours as good as theirs but I can't source anything that English editors won't delete as unsourced. Now it's created though, hopefully someone will come along and help like you have. Any advice to add any of this Polish and Russian info that doesn't appear sourced appreciated too. I need to improve my sourcing and will keep trying... JamesKnight7 (talk) 09:00, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
I looked as well. Google Translate is your friend here, on any sources that they mention. A search for a Russian speaker or reader on WP:TEAHOUSE may bear fruit. All I've been able to do is to track down the Wikidata thing and link the accepted article to it.
A valid action is to sit and await community improvement, enjoying watching developments. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 09:10, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
Oh, referencing. Be careful that your references are always about, certainly giving coverage to, the subject of the article itself. It's endlessly tempting to cite something your subject participated in that does not refer to the subject, but that is not a valid reference. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 09:17, 3 September 2023 (UTC)Reply
edit

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Donald Young (choir director), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mystery. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:01, 9 September 2023 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Donald Young

edit

  Hello, JamesKnight7. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Donald Young, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:06, 7 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Thank you for your concern. I think I'll leave it there until you bots delete it as humans should be concerned about Donald Young. JamesKnight7 (talk) 17:32, 8 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, Draft:Donald Young

edit
 

Hello, JamesKnight7. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Donald Young".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 23:25, 6 March 2024 (UTC)Reply

I have sent you a note about a page you started

edit

Hi JamesKnight7. Thank you for your work on Beda Bubbing. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

It's a start. (I'm marking it as reviewed based on SNG) Needs much more to put the article on firm ground. Happy editing!

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|North8000}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

North8000 (talk) 11:13, 24 September 2024 (UTC)Reply