Jakub656

Speedy deletion nomination of Guys to take

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Guys to take requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Eyesnore (pc) 14:09, 17 June 2015 (UTC)

Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages, such as Guys to take, to Wikipedia, as doing so is not in accordance with our policies. For more information about creating articles, you may want to read Wikipedia:Your first article; you might also consider using the Article Wizard. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. You need to post more than a few words. See WP:V and Wikipedia:Your first article. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:07, 19 June 2015 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. At the best, your edits have been unsupported by any sources, so that there is no way of verifying your claims, and the edits look very much like vandalism. If you believe there are good reasons for the changes you have made, then you need to explain what those reasons are, so that other editors can understand. Also, you need to provide references to reliable sources which support the claims you have made. Just repeatedly making the same kind of edits without explanation is unhelpful, and if you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:05, 21 June 2015 (UTC)