January 2021

edit

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Nacer Chadli has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Caius G. (talk) 18:34, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Not too sure why this is "innqpropriate" JakeMo14 (talk) 18:36, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Not inappropriate, but inaccurate (although it might just boil down to semantics). In addition to that the edit with unsourced, hence the reversion. Best, Caius G. (talk) 18:40, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

I believe this is detrimental to the page All the best Jake JakeMo14 (talk) 18:41, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Charles Leclerc. Caius G. (talk) 19:03, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hey man, I didnt do anything to Scott Carson wiki page JakeMo14 (talk) 00:32, 9 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

January 2021

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Nacer Chadli have been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Nacer Chadli was changed by JakeMo14 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.85118 on 2021-01-08T18:40:32+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 18:40, 8 January 2021 (UTC)Reply